I don't understand the reluctancy to bring in Stastny. We have historically been able to weasel ourselves out of EVERY bad contract we've signed. When you sign a UFA, you overpay because you're giving up 0 assets. This is what people are forgetting. Who cares about the cap hit? We're giving up literally nothing except cap space. The guy is a proven 65-75 point center in the Western Conference; he would likely do even better in the weaker East. The way I see it, this team needs a better Center to put them over the top. Lundqvist is not getting any younger and this team has a very small window with him to compete for a Cup. Here are our options:
1. Do nothing this offseason and roll Stepan-Brassard-Miller-Moore/Boyle down the middle next year. This is absolutely not an option. We couldn't win with Stepan-Brassard-Richards-Moore down the middle. What makes any of you think we can win with the former?
2. Trade assets for Spezza/Kesler. I actually think Spezza would be a better fit on this team than Stastny because of his right handed shot and style of play, but we're going to have to give up decent assets to acquire him. This is a better option than option 1, but still not ideal as we'd be dealing mainly roster players.
3. Slightly overpay a UFA and give up absolutely no assets, but possibly let other pieces walk (Stralman, Boyle etc.). This is the lesser of (3) evils, IMO. 4th liners and 2nd pairing defensemen are easier to replace than legitimate 2 way 1C's. This is the route we should be looking at taking given the run we just went on and the "Lundqvist Window." By all accounts, Boyle is gone and Stralman has priced himself out of NY regardless of who we sign; we're probably losing these guys anyway. Why not use the cap space to fill a hole this team has been trying to fill for the past 10 years?