Who will get the bigger contract: Marner or Rantanen?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Who will get the bigger contract: Marner or Rantanen?

  • Marner

    Votes: 48 54.5%
  • Rantanen

    Votes: 35 39.8%
  • Not sure

    Votes: 5 5.7%

  • Total voters
    88
No, I don't think this take makes sense. The perception Colorado had was Mikko is a complementary player who got so many points because he played alongside MacKinnon most of the time.

If he doesn't get points in Carolina, GMs will notice, especially if Necas continues to outscore him the rest of the season which he's doing right now (as of this post Necas has 12 points in 11 games compared to 3 in 8 for Rants)

EDIT: Mikko scored 2 points in tonight's game so has 5 points in 9 games so far with Carolina (thx @RoyIsALegend)

GMs often pay for past performance and love the headlines that would come from signing a top player like Rantanen. I think it's a foregone conclusion he beats Tavares' $77 million dollar contract.

Pre trade he had 52 points in 44 games without MackInnon across his career, that would be 92 points in a full season. 92 points would be his 3rd best point total cross a full season in his career.
 
GMs often pay for past performance and love the headlines that would come from signing a top player like Rantanen. I think it's a foregone conclusion he beats Tavares' $77 million dollar contract.

Pre trade he had 52 points in 44 games without MackInnon across his career, that would be 92 points in a full season. 92 points would be his 3rd best point total cross a full season in his career.

I'm not entirely sure what he'll make but to be honest I think it really depends how he and the Hurricanes go the rest of the year. Right now he's at 5 points in 9 games, that's a 46 point pace over 82 games which is not good at all. I don't expect that pace to last but I think both of our pace examples have too small of a sample size to be meaningful.

***

Put a different way my disagreement with your take is your statement "He could go pointless the rest of the season and he wouldn't lose any money as a free agent," I completely disagree with that. If he actually goes pointless the rest of the season (ie 5 points in 30ish games in Carolina) -- of course that's not realistic but if that happens I think he'll be costing himself 10s of millions over the course of the contract.

More realistically (but still on the low end), if Mikko finishes with something like 20 or so points in ~30 games with Carolina then it'll be up his playoff performance -- if he ends up being mediocre and Canes lose early I think it's highly unlikely that he'll become one of the game's top paid players ie the 13-14m range that he and his agent want. Conversely if he goes over a point a game going forward, the Canes win the cup and Rants wins the Conn Smythe, imo he's certainly going to make that much money and potentially more.

None of really know what'll happen so we'll see. Either way imo his performance with Carolina (in either direction) will certainly affect his upcoming UFA deal, I don't think this is even a question
 
I'm not entirely sure what he'll make but to be honest I think it really depends how he and the Hurricanes go the rest of the year. Right now he's at 5 points in 9 games, that's a 46 point pace over 82 games which is not good at all. I don't expect that pace to last but I think both of our pace examples have too small of a sample size to be meaningful.

***

Put a different way my disagreement with your take is your statement "He could go pointless the rest of the season and he wouldn't lose any money as a free agent," I completely disagree with that. If he actually goes pointless the rest of the season (ie 5 points in 30ish games in Carolina) -- of course that's not realistic but if that happens I think he'll be costing himself 10s of millions over the course of the contract.

More realistically (but still on the low end), if Mikko finishes with something like 20 or so points in ~30 games with Carolina then it'll be up his playoff performance -- if he ends up being mediocre and Canes lose early I think it's highly unlikely that he'll become one of the game's top paid players ie the 13-14m range that he and his agent want. Conversely if he goes over a point a game going forward, the Canes win the cup and Rants wins the Conn Smythe, imo he's certainly going to make that much money and potentially more.

None of really know what'll happen so we'll see. Either way imo his performance with Carolina (in either direction) will certainly affect his upcoming UFA deal, I don't think this is even a question

We'll have to agree to disagree here because I dont think his Carolina tenure will affect his free agent value much if at all. You could chalk up poor performance to a sudden change of scenery, line mates whatever. Not saying thats the case but ultimately as I said, GMs will still be climbing over one another to sign him and give him. blank check so to speak.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad