We’ll find out in a decade but to say that Demidov is “not selectable from this group” because he doesn’t yet play in the NHL makes no sense.Demidov is 100% not selectable from this group as your first choice. He simply has no basis for reasonable comparison, at his ability to compete in the best league in the world, against the very best players. He could be awesome....but so can the others who are already proving it. He's #5.
Next? Kind of impossible to pick. You have the B2B consensus #1 picks, who were hyped as the very best of the best of their draft class, and potential Tip-top NHL players. And centres to boot. They haven't disappointed...much. Bedard was touted as a Crosby-type generational impact, and whilst he's not quite lived up to the massive hype, he has been absoltely fantastic for his age, and linemates! Celebrini was somewhat less touted, but demonstrates a rounder game at this point, which may stifle the point-earning side of things that truly defines the very best of what the NHL has to offer...defense, well, that is not flashy.
Celebrini and Bedard are doing awesome, I give the edge to Bedard via the offense, which trumps the all-around game when picking the superstar you want.
Michkov ranks slighly slightly behind Celebrini, almost the same. He has more offensive oomph, and substantially less defensive oomph. But it is awfully close, and could easily still end up being flipped, even in this year's Calder voting.
Ranking Lane Hutson is the hardest of all, and versus his forward opponents. It's very difficult to do. He's been fantastic at his job. He belongs in the grouping though.
On a scale of 1 to 10, here's my final rankings:
Bedard 9.00
Celebrini 8.95
Hutson 8.90
Michkov 8.90
Demidov 5.00
For comparisons:
McDavid 9.90
Barkov 9.50
Hellebucky? 9.30
Justin Wolff 8.50 (he's only getting knocked down because of his up and down position)
I think he just needs to prove it first. Just a bit. Before it makes sense to try and rank him for all-time greatness against players who already have. Anything else is, as you say, "F'ing idiotic, like elite level.".We’ll find out in a decade but to say that Demidov is “not selectable from this group” because he doesn’t yet play in the NHL is F’ing idiotic, like elite level.
I think he just needs to prove it first. Just a bit. Before it makes sense to try and rank him for all-time greatness against players who already have. Anything else is, as you say, "F'ing idiotic, like elite level.".
If you want to pick him first, go ahead. I'll be interested in how you explain it.
I’m not picking him first. You clearly have reading comprehension issues.I think he just needs to prove it first. Just a bit. Before it makes sense to try and rank him for all-time greatness against players who already have. Anything else is, as you say, "F'ing idiotic, like elite level.".
If you want to pick him first, go ahead. I'll be interested in how you explain it.
I would put Bedard in the second tier but that's my ranking too.Celebrini
Hutson
Demidov
Bedard
Michkov
Some good catches there1. Bedard = McDavid
3. Michkov = Kucherov
2. Celebrini = Barkov
4. Hutson = Subban
5. Demidov = Galchenyuk
The anti-habs bias in these types of threads is always amusing.
Demidov's biggest fan is Lane Hutson. He's the best player outside of the NHL.Same way people (self included) were sleeping on J.Hughes is how Bedard is being overlooked. I’d say he still holds the highest potential. He and Michkov are in worse positions than the rest. Also I dunno how people are ranking Demidov higher than rookies who are or have been near PPG. He should either be left off the list until he plays or below guys who have already proven they can play and contribute in the NHL.
Demidov has a higher ppg in the KHL than Michkov did last year. we’ll see how it translates to the NHL. I wouldn’t say Bedard is doing too hot, considering he isn’t even leading in points on his own team.Demidov is 100% not selectable from this group as your first choice. He simply has no basis for reasonable comparison, at his ability to compete in the best league in the world, against the very best players. He could be awesome....but so can the others who are already proving it. He's #5.
Next? Kind of impossible to pick. You have the B2B consensus #1 picks, who were hyped as the very best of the best of their draft class, and potential Tip-top NHL players. And centres to boot. They haven't disappointed...much. Bedard was touted as a Crosby-type generational impact, and whilst he's not quite lived up to the massive hype, he has been absoltely fantastic for his age, and linemates! Celebrini was somewhat less touted, but demonstrates a rounder game at this point, which may stifle the point-earning side of things that truly defines the very best of what the NHL has to offer...defense, well, that is not flashy.
Celebrini and Bedard are doing awesome, I give the edge to Bedard via the offense, which trumps the all-around game when picking the superstar you want.
Michkov ranks slighly slightly behind Celebrini, almost the same. He has more offensive oomph, and substantially less defensive oomph. But it is awfully close, and could easily still end up being flipped, even in this year's Calder voting.
Ranking Lane Hutson is the hardest of all, and versus his forward opponents. It's very difficult to do. He's been fantastic at his job. He belongs in the grouping though.
On a scale of 1 to 10, here's my final rankings:
Bedard 9.00
Celebrini 8.95
Hutson 8.90
Michkov 8.90
Demidov 5.00
For comparisons:
McDavid 9.90
Barkov 9.50
Hellebucky? 9.30
Justin Wolff 8.50 (he's only getting knocked down because of his up and down position)
The fact that our 2nd round pick is beating Celebrini and michkov for the calder is literally crazy.Almost as amusing as Habs fan butthurtness in these threads.
The goal posts keep getting moved thoughCelebrini has to be #1 because he's the only true top line, all star center.
Then Michkov as I think he's a better winger than Bedard is.
Then Bedard.
Then Demidov.
Then Hutson.
Hutson last is really just a reflection of my opinion that he will get steamrolled in playoff hockey.
He's two years older and playing with actual NHL players. When Lane and Mack were on the same team last year it was obvious who the better/more important player was.The fact that our 2nd round pick is beating Celebrini and michkov for the calder is literally crazy.
Hutson and Michkov are both 04s so he is not 2 years older than Michkov.He's two years older and playing with actual NHL players. When Lane and Mack were on the same team last year it was obvious who the better/more important player was.
I said NHL players, nothing about a great supporting cast. And my comparison was only to Macklin, haven't seen enough of Michkov to have an opinion/care. Agree with everything else you've said.Now that they're in the playoffs its."he has a great supporting cast"
He's two years older and playing with actual NHL players. When Lane and Mack were on the same team last year it was obvious who the better/more important player was.
Only to be balanced by the blatant Habs homerism.
Where else would you find Hutson/Demidov to close to call for the highest rank sans the Habs board?