Jurivan Demidovsky
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2025
- 240
- 439
Delusional take that goes against numbers and reason, but you're entitled to it.I just did and Macklin is better defensively.
Delusional take that goes against numbers and reason, but you're entitled to it.I just did and Macklin is better defensively.
The Hutson vs Gostisbehere comparison is rooted in delusion and Habs hatred.Think it's hard to pick at this juncture, and particularly unfair to Demidov since he hasn't played a minute of NHL hockey yet.
I admittedly haven't seen enough of Hutson's season, but I do get vapors of rookie Shayne Gostisbehere. I bet we could dig up some en-year-old thread and find all sorts of arguments that sound verbatim like the conversations around Hutson today. He was the most electrifying, intelligent rookie defenseman I had ever seen, he sparked a weak Flyers team into the playoffs, and was CERTAIN to be a franchise cornerstone and to challenge Karlsson for D points leaders every year. He had a higher PPG than fellow rookie Jack Eichel! Surely, he was a better player!
And then after that he was just Shayne Gostisbehere. Good player, not a great one. For Hutson, as hot as he looks now, it's about rounding out and sustaining it. Forwards are a bit easier to project in terms of scoring, but offensive defensemen typically have yoyoing results year-in and year-out, so it's what they do when the points aren't piling up that differentiates them. Interested to see how Hutson progresses from here.
Don't think you can go wrong with Michkov, Celebrini, and Bedard. Think Bedard shakes out as the weakest player of the bunch though.
The Hutson vs Gostisbehere comparison is rooted in delusion and Habs hatred.
So it has exactly the same logic as comparing any of the others to any player of the same position who peaked as a rookie thenIt's rooted in firsthand experience watching a young offensive defenseman tear off a ridiculous rookie season and then not improve from that point. I don't hate the Habs at all.
Difference with Hutson is that he has elite offensive numbers (I'm sure you are familiar) at every level he's played at. The question with him was always would his size and strength translate to the big leagues. When you finally get around to actually watching him a few games you'll see hes not a flash in the pan.It's rooted in firsthand experience watching a young offensive defenseman tear off a ridiculous rookie season and then not improve from that point. I don't hate the Habs at all.
Difference with Hutson is that he has elite offensive numbers (I'm sure you are familiar) at every level he's played at. The question with him was always would his size and strength translate to the big leagues. When you finally get around to actually watching him a few games you'll see hes not a flash in the pan.
Ghost was a third round pick who was 8th on his college team in scoring in his draft year with 22 points in 41 games. 5th in his d+1 with 25 pts in 36.
Hutson was 5th in his draft year with 32 points in 27 games (Frank nazar, a center who went 13th overall had 35 points in 24 games) and went on to lead BU in points in his d+1 season, breaking 30 year old records for college D in the process.
But if you guys really want to die on the Shayne Gostisbehere hill I'm here for it. Will be fun to revisit in a few.
You're not and I can respect that you're simply pointing out the similarities in discourse. Which has nothing to do with the players, but moot point.No one's dying on any hill and I'm moreso comparing the early discourse around the players than the players themselves. As in: The conversations and constant criticism/defenses are very familiar.
The Hutson vs Gostisbehere comparison is rooted in delusion and Habs hatred.
That too. Although I don't believe that it's more likely in most cases for Hutson, reeks of jealousyOr, more likely, just a very poor understanding of hockey
Nobody actually believes it. It's pure jealousyYou're not and I can respect that you're simply pointing out the similarities in discourse. Which has nothing to do with the players, but moot point.
There are definitely some that are dying on the Ghost hill, it gives them comfort to believe that Hutson will end up a one way journeyman defender like Ghost did, rather than understanding that Hutson is taking the Quinn Hughes trajectory into superstardom.
It's rooted in firsthand experience watching a young offensive defenseman tear off a ridiculous rookie season and then not improve from that point. I don't hate the Habs at all.
CelebriniCelebrini
Hutson
Demidov
Michkov
Bedard
Well, if the objective is to be immersed with talent, why would he leave? They have a very good prospect pool, and will add Schaeffer/Misa/Hagens this year. The ymay even get McKenna next year. Sure, they'll suck for a few years, but by the time he's in a position to bolt, they may have another cup contending team in place.Celebrini
Hutson
Demidov
Michkov
Bedard
I think it all depends who gets on a better team or the team brings in more talent around them the fastest. Bedard should bolt out of Chitown ASAP because we all know Gary rigged the lotto for them to win it.
Michkov is far more physical than Bedard, what is this nonsense?
Bedard - Elite first line forward who has become far more versatile due to necessity of accommodating his supporting cast over the first years of his career. Grossly underrated at this point by people who are only tracking his points and not witnessing what he's forced to attempt to accomplish on the Blackhawks.
Celbrini - Same tier, but just a small step behind Bedard.
Michkov - As offensively gifted as Bedard, but with some gaps in his physical and defensive play that render him overall less effective.
Hutson - A tier below the other three due to defensive weaknesses, despite his having strong reads and stickwork. His physicality will always limit him, as we see with his inability to clear the crease. Requires a proper partner to help shore up those issues and thus will not be as effective in isolation. Other Habs fans underestimate those limitations and the significance of his poor underlying numbers, even if other fanbases underestimate both his defensive intelligence and sheer dominance in zone entries and slot-passes.
Demidov - A rung below Hutson, but still a first line forward.
Takes like these are going to be insane in the not too distant futureRaw potential and you have Bedard ahead? He's got the least potential of those 4, he's nothing special at all.
Bedard's 19 year old season is extremely pedestrian compared to other top draftees in the last 20 years.What strikes me as crazy about this comparison, and how Celebrini continues to fly under the radar, is this guy is 18. 18 years old on a bottom 3 team in the league and flirting with PPG. 2-3 years of physical development at this stage is massive, so the fact that he looks like the best player currently, while being compared to guys 19-21 is being overlooked.
I would probably throw Bedard into that argument too to a lesser extent. What they are doing at that age is crazy.
Fantastic point sir.So it has exactly the same logic as comparing any of the others to any player of the same position who peaked as a rookie then
Weird how nobody is doing that