Satire?I'm here for this. We are f***ed anyway. Embrace full satire.
Satire?I'm here for this. We are f***ed anyway. Embrace full satire.
It's kinda like saying let's stupidest timeline this shit.Satire?
What’s an ass coachi like gerard gallent hard ass coach loves to play offense when he coached the panthers/knights/rangers. 2nd choice jay woodcroft. deserves a second chance he is a good coach too. 3rd option go the european route/ncaa. i dont want them to hire in the system that is such a "easy way out". maybe malhotra as an assistant for a year or two. dan byslma ?
a tough kind of coach.What’s an ass coach
(I’m incredibly bored don’t block me pls)
Username checks out.In order of preference:
1. Quenneville
2. Todd Nelson
3. Malhotra
4. Woodcroft
Quenneville has served his time and if he has rehabilitated and learned, he should be the next coach. Choosing a vastly inferior candidate in a results-based business due to something that happened 15 years ago is a loser mentality.
Maybe too much recency bias on my end but the Rangers looked awful this year, and even last year they looked like a team that should have gotten better results than they did. He’s in the “ok” bucket for me.I've always been a fan of Laviolette. He's been solid everywhere, and I don't blame him at all for the disaster in New York this year. Rutherford connection too.
Laviolette, Gallant, Todd Nelson, Jeremy Colliton, Mike Yeo, Jay Woodcroft ... all names I could live with.
Gallant seems to be a good coach but a short shelf-life coach. It's he hard on players? Will that discourage Hughes from re-signing? How does petterson react?
I have no problem with Manny getting the nod here. He knows the game, he has a ton of credibility and is as resilient as they come. He's been in a lot of NHL rooms over his career, been a high draft pick who's role had to be carved out because the offense never materialized. Had to come to terms with a devastating career ending injury at the the worst imaginable time. He's been an OHL champion (lost memorial cup finals in OT), Won the Calder cup in 2000.I would go with Malhotra. He hasn’t head coached an NHL team before, but even as a player he was a well respected leader. And I think a lot of Rutherford’s criteria hinted at Malhotra possibly being their guy.
Like many others I suspect they'll go the easy route and just name Malhotra. But the other guy I suspect would get a lot of consideration (and doesn't have much of a record for people to attack) is Woodcroft.
I’m working on an article about this.
We already have been told that Sullivan won’t come out West and David Carle is, reportedly, staying in the NCAA.
Im actually the opposite of thisAs much as I like him, I feel like Malhotra might be the wrong fit for this group right now? If we were a young team expected to grow together and learn from mistakes - I'd be 100% in favor. We're not that team though - we have like 2 years to sort our shit out or Hughes is likely gone.