SavBigMoneyAtBedards
Back in Black, Red, and White
- Feb 11, 2012
- 8,909
- 4,724
They were all impressive but Dustin Wolf almost dragged that craptastic Flames team to a playoff spot.
Did you even read my last post? I ditched the comparables/cohorts argument because you didn’t think it was fair, as a courtesy to you. Celebrini still loses badly.I'm not doubling down on BS....I've already suggest Hutson should win the award, all I've suggested is that it's a bit an insult to Celebrini to suggest he doesn't even deserved to be discussion the same breath as Hutson, which is what we are saying when we remove Hutson from the conversation and put him in his own tier. I understand Hutson put up great numbers for a rookie Dman, but that's mostly because Dmen tend to take more time to mature, etc. Hutson is 20 or 21, he's not 18 like Celebrini.
I'm not disputing who had the better rookie year, but your comparables didn't make a lot of sense to me...you seemed to be picking comparables that weren't actual comparables for Celebrini to make him look worse....not that it matters anyway as some guys have great rookie years and turn out to be nothing beyond that and some are the opposite. But interesting that you didn't use as comparbles, for example, Jagr, Bure, Kane or MacKinnon. Celebrini's year is arguably comparable or better than some of them.
Technically, Celebrini is top 10 all-time in points for an 18 year old. Extrapolate 70 games to 82 and he's top 5. That's not really the point here though. A defenseman that finishes with the 5th highest point totals ever by a rookie dman doesn't automatically mean they've had a better year than a forward who finishes with the 50th highest point totals by a rookie forward. Generally speaking, rookie dmen don't do that well in comparison to forwards. But I'm also not trying to suggest Celebrini's season was on par or better than Hutson's anyway, just suggesting there isn't this huge gap that you are trying to illustrate.Did you even read my last post? I ditched the comparables/cohorts argument because you didn’t think it was fair, as a courtesy to you. Celebrini still loses badly.
Again, Hutson’s rookie season ranks 5th all time in scoring among rookie D.
Celebrini would’ve had to put up 99 points to place 5th all time in rookie scoring among forwards, if we exclude older rookies.
Had he put up 99 points, he’d still be behind Lemieux, Crosby, Hawerchuk, and Ovechkin. Again, this is excluding older rookies, since you made a big stink about that.
Relative to the league this year, it’s the same thing. He would’ve needed 98 points to rank 7th among forwards in scoring.
He was nowhere close to this, and his rookie season was nowhere close to Hutson’s, in relative terms.
AgreedTechnically, Celebrini is top 10 all-time in points for an 18 year old. Extrapolate 70 games to 82 and he's top 5. That's not really the point here though. A defenseman that finishes with the 5th highest point totals ever by a rookie dman doesn't automatically mean they've had a better year than a forward who finishes with the 50th highest point totals by a rookie forward. Generally speaking, rookie dmen don't do that well in comparison to forwards. But I'm also not trying to suggest Celebrini's season was on par or better than Hutson's anyway, just suggesting there isn't this huge gap that you are trying to illustrate.
Considering having Georgiev is an automatic -10 on anything done previously, that’s actually pretty impressive.Insanely impressive the way he got his team one extra win from last season
Enough. There is no age criteria for the Calder Trophy that applies here. I already accommodated your BS argument enough by excluding older rookies in my earlier post as a show of arguing in good faith, and in favour of Celebrini. He still comes out behind, by a huge margin.Technically, Celebrini is top 10 all-time in points for an 18 year old. Extrapolate 70 games to 82 and he's top 5.
A defenseman that finishes with the 5th highest point totals ever by a rookie dman doesn't automatically mean they've had a better year than a forward who finishes with the 50th highest point totals by a rookie forward.
You’re now unintentionally arguing in favour of Hutson without even realizing itGenerally speaking, rookie dmen don't do that well in comparison to forwards.
Yes. There is. If you use logic like yours that makes absolutely zero sense, I guess you could come to the conclusion that Celebrini was close to Hutson this year, as you’ve shown. In reality, the gap between their rookie seasons is massive.just suggesting there isn't this huge gap that you are trying to illustrate.
Hutson did what he did as a defenseman. Celebrini is tremendous but Hutson was more impactfulCelebrini, and it's not even close. You could argue he's been the best rookie. He finished just 1 point behind Hutson depsite missing a month (10 games less).
In the end it's meaningless. It's just a rookie award. Celebrini will be the far better player in the long run.
He wasn’t the best rookie. Not even close. He had a good season. Hutson had a historic season. I think Wolf could make a case for having a better season than Celly. Wold made a difference. Celly, not so much.Celebrini, and it's not even close. You could argue he's been the best rookie. He finished just 1 point behind Hutson depsite missing a month (10 games less).
In the end it's meaningless. It's just a rookie award. Celebrini will be the far better player in the long run.
Pretty wild to see people dismiss his age as a contributing factor when voting happens. Not saying he wins but it definitely makes his season a bit more impressive along with games playedCelebrini given his age and accomplishment.
Are you suggesting Hutson is the sole reason they made the playoffs?Insanely impressive the way he got his team one extra win from last season
I should be even more clear— I disagree with the premise of the thread that Hutson is a runaway best rookie. Very likely can win the Calder, but I think Celebrini is in the fight, not a foregone conclusion to be second place.Pretty wild to see people dismiss his age as a contributing factor when voting happens. Not saying he wins but it definitely makes his season a bit more impressive along with games played
That impact for the Flames has a lot to do with the importance of the goalie position for teams.He wasn’t the best rookie. Not even close. He had a good season. Hutson had a historic season. I think Wolf could make a case for having a better season than Celly. Wold made a difference. Celly, not so much.
I expect Hutson will be better and more impactful throughout their careers!
Celly / Wolf tied for 2nd.
Right, I think the OP is begging the question with how he/she framed the poll.I should be even more clear— I disagree with the premise of the thread that Hutson is a runaway best rookie. Very likely can win the Calder, but I think Celebrini is in the fight, not a foregone conclusion to be second place.
That's a hilariously correct and objectively true statement.Wolf, Calgary had more points then MTL.
His season ranks 94th all time in scoring among rookie forwards. There is zero rational argument for Celebrini over Hutson lol.Celebrini stepped onto the ice as a #1C in his rookie year. Has to be him. The real question is who is third.
He’s saying Celly is #2 over Wolf.His season ranks 94th all time in scoring among rookie forwards. There is zero rational argument for Celebrini over Hutson lol.
Flames were projected to finnish ahead of MTL and they did.Flames projected to be a bottom 5 team and had 30th rank offense had more points than Habs/sharks/flyers. Has to be wolf but I’m prepared for him to finish 4th in Calder, because again he plays for the flames.