Who should the Chicago Blackhawks select 2nd overall in the 2024 NHL Entry Draft?

Who do the Chicago Blackhawks select 2nd overall?


  • Total voters
    248
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Section88

Kaner? I hardly know her
Jul 11, 2017
5,645
4,872
Would love to see what Demidov could do in Rockford next year.
Edit - guess he's got another year on his contract. Oh well.
 

OhCaptainMyCaptain

Registered User
May 5, 2014
22,362
2,542
Earth
The thing is, he still has issues in his game when you watch him in the MHL.

He does a lot of dangling and lapping around the ice which results in nothing happening or turnovers. It's cool that he can do those things, but it's very inneficient and it won't fly in the NHL imo.

He can adapt. And I'm sure he will. But then what are you left with?

He had a tiny sample size against men this year and although he didn't look out of place, he also wasn't doing any of the highlight reel things you see him do in the MHL.

He's also a small player. Strong on his skates, but there's no physical side to his game. And he's not committed to playing defense.

I just think there's a lot of question marks there.

He could be the pick at #2, but it's far from a foregone conclusion. It's not a slam dunk pick imo.

So how are you picking this up but every other place that does prospects isn’t? Not doubting you, but I am always curious about the disconnect.
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
21,629
18,651
Bomoseen, Vermont
The thing is, he still has issues in his game when you watch him in the MHL.

He does a lot of dangling and lapping around the ice which results in nothing happening or turnovers. It's cool that he can do those things, but it's very inneficient and it won't fly in the NHL imo.

He can adapt. And I'm sure he will. But then what are you left with?

He had a tiny sample size against men this year and although he didn't look out of place, he also wasn't doing any of the highlight reel things you see him do in the MHL.

He's also a small player. Strong on his skates, but there's no physical side to his game. And he's not committed to playing defense.

I just think there's a lot of question marks there.

He could be the pick at #2, but it's far from a foregone conclusion. It's not a slam dunk pick imo.
Besides the fact that he does play defense, a lot more than the stereotypical "Russian".. my overarching point would be that there are no slam dunk picks at two this year.

How about trading the #2 to Utah for #6 and a young forward like Maccelli?
How about no.
 

Cowch

Registered User
Jan 24, 2019
2,313
2,363
I expected this to be way way closer. Welcome change to see how much we agree atm
 

ChicagoHockeyFan

Registered User
Mar 3, 2019
436
348
The thing is, he still has issues in his game when you watch him in the MHL.

He does a lot of dangling and lapping around the ice which results in nothing happening or turnovers. It's cool that he can do those things, but it's very inneficient and it won't fly in the NHL imo.

He can adapt. And I'm sure he will. But then what are you left with?

He had a tiny sample size against men this year and although he didn't look out of place, he also wasn't doing any of the highlight reel things you see him do in the MHL.

He's also a small player. Strong on his skates, but there's no physical side to his game. And he's not committed to playing defense.

I just think there's a lot of question marks there.

He could be the pick at #2, but it's far from a foregone conclusion. It's not a slam dunk pick imo.
Definitely more of a projection than most years at #2, other picks are safer but if you wanna swing for the fences and try and get the best potential player I think it’s Demidov
 

Kevin Musto

Hard for Bedard
Feb 16, 2018
22,594
29,269
So how are you picking this up but every other place that does prospects isn’t? Not doubting you, but I am always curious about the disconnect.
I'm not the only one.

Other outlets have the same concerns I do, they're just weighting it differently and still keeping him at #2 in spite of the issues.
 

Wally1112pac

Three Year Rebuild lol
Jul 10, 2019
1,591
2,613
From Wheeler's latest top 32 article.

"Artyom Levshunov was No. 2 on my list for most of this season, but Demidov’s play during the MHL playoffs (which unfortunately ended due to a lower-body injury just prior to SKA winning the championship) crystalized him behind Macklin Celebrini down the stretch. He’s got the most individual puck skill in the class but I’ve also heard good things about his work ethic on and off the ice and he has developed some layers to his game so that he’s not a one-trick pony as a dancing offensive zone player.
Demidov is a skill-first playmaking forward who finished third in the MHL in scoring last year (extremely rare for a player that age in a league typically dominated by 19- and 20-year-olds) and played at a higher point-per-game pace than the two players in front of him alongside his older brother, Semyon. This season, after a strong preseason with SKA, he won a KHL job out of camp but played little and then, after bouncing between levels trying to rediscover his game, injured his knee and missed a month and a half. After returning, he tore up the MHL with one multi-point game after another and five to 10 shots a night, putting together one of the most productive extended stretches of play ever at Russia’s top junior level and making pretty goals look casual.
He’s on the older side as a December 2005, but it sounds like he’s dedicated to getting stronger, he's a true play creator and you want the puck in his hands so he can slip around the ice to make things happen for himself or his linemates. His ability to get off the wall to the middle, either with the puck on his stick into traffic (though I think he falls back on his heel-to-heel skating a little too much), his manipulation one-on-one, his knack for dodging sticks and checks, and his passing through layers to the weak side of coverage are all very unique. And while his skating in straight lines doesn't always look smooth, he's still a fast skater and very shifty side to side. He's got elite handling (though he can get himself into trouble trying to beat two or three guys in a crowd, he also often beats multiple guys in a sequence) and made more one-on-one skill plays this season (including, unabated, in the postseason) than almost any prospect I've scouted for any draft. He’s also a pretty engaged off-puck player who keeps his feet moving, hunts pucks on the forecheck, and can turn a steal into a game-breaking play in an instant. Demidov’s one of the most purely talented prospects to come out of Russia in recent memory (his game also has more of a pro style, competitiveness and roundedness to it than Matvei Michkov's had at the same age) and scouts really like him. He profiles as a point-producing star winger and PP specialist."
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
21,629
18,651
Bomoseen, Vermont
Kucherov draft year MHL
undefined flag
Krasnaya Armiya Moskva
MHL412731588142Playoffs105813167
Demidov draft year MHL
undefined flag
SKA-1946 St. Petersburg
MHL302337602047Playoffs171117283719

He had 28 points in 17 playoff games. Elite playoff run, I watched a lot of those games. I was/am a big Catton guy, but Demidov's upside is too good to pass up. Everyone in this draft has flaws. Lots of them. So just bet on his talent and hope for the best.
 

clydesdale line

Connor BeJesus
Jan 10, 2012
25,479
24,218
The fact that Demidov doesn't need surgery on his knee is huge as well. Sure him not training for 6-8 weeks will suck for him but it isn't a death sentence.

Hawks can still potentially pick a guy like Jiricek with that #20 pick too.
 

hawksfan50

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
14,508
2,083
No..Lindstrom iscthe correct selection...

Justcwatch playoffs...You will need power and gritand size +sjilk not just skill and get pushed around and off pucks.

Hawks on the other hand may never get to playoff land with $9.5 as 1D....

Still if you are re-building ,easier to fins skilk than a big power C who physically imposes the game.

Lindstrom is just scratching the surface...Demidov 's skill is there now as with Bedard or with McKenna or Hagens in future drafts..but "ceilng" for Lindstrom will be better as he grows even stronger with his size..If he wax just a big liug that is one thing ...

But he is not that..He has sone goodcskilk and a powerful shot..You cannot teach size and if they also have talent as he does then you getca 200ft C who can DICTATE the game and especialky in playoffsxwhen you have got to have that elopement.

If KD talesxa trade down we still can get Lindstrom at #3,4 or 5 ...orvif surprised anf the trade down fails (he isvoff before our trade down pick we Still can get IGINLA who brings more size and power and grit than Demidov and whose shot is better too.

So he'll no...JD should not take Demidov but get us what we Need...Lindstrom or Iginla ..

BTW....nowctgat SJ will draft Celebrinini their 1-2 centerscare Will Smith and Celebrini....has theirvre-build just leap-frogged us?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ColbyChaos

CapitalistInfidel

Registered User
Jan 7, 2013
205
54
I don’t get the Demidov love. He’s like a travel team kid playing against house league kids. Talk about taking a risk. On top of that he’s not particularly fast and his predominant skating style is 10 and 2. That’s not going to work in the nhl unless you think he’s as talented as McDavid and Crosby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHFAN92
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad