Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
Well there we have it folks, Hayes has a beard, he should be captain.
That's the most sane thing he's said all year

Well there we have it folks, Hayes has a beard, he should be captain.
Quinn said Captains emerge... I guess we will have to wait and see no?
Kevin mother****ing Purple Hayes
He’ll he lucky to be on the roster past the New Year, imo.
If NY had any intentions of giving him the captaincy, I think they would have committed themselves with a longer contact than 12 months.
you don't think giving him a captaincy would increase his trade value?
No it wouldn’t.
It would just make our entire organization look stupid.
to him, we on the other hand have seen most of these guys and can form our opinions.
to him, we on the other hand have seen most of these guys and can form our opinions.
DJ El CapitanoZibanejad just for the reaction on here
I don't want Zuccarello to be our captain, because I want us to trade him at the deadline. Not because I don't like him, I love Zucc. But he's a rental at the deadline with great value. It just makes sense for us to trade him in February.
Tell me something. If you ignore the trade option for a while, do you think Zucc would be a good captain for this team? Or is there something else you don't like about him? Let me guess...shoot the puck more ;-)
Be honest, criticism can make one better.
I like this place anyway, good to see so many people interested in hockey, and I guess some of you are also on the ice. That's great, stay active and take care of your health, don't sit in front of a computer all day long.
I like Zuccarello. Always have. If he stays, he's the right option to captain our team from what I've read from player interviews. The only reason I don't want him to be the captain is because I still expect him to be traded at the deadline. With the position we are in, I just don't see the need for Zuccarello, considering what he might be worth at the deadline. By the time we are contending, he's 34. What would be better for the Rangers?
Thanks for your thoughts, I understand your point. Personally I don't think it's smart to get too young and inexperienced if this rebuild is going to be a success, specially when even the coaching staff is kind of green. But both views are valid.
We still have Spooner, Fast, Namestnikov, Kreider, Zibanejad. It's not as if Zuccarello is the only person who brings that experience we need for the young kids. The thing is, that these players aren't in the same position as Zuccarello (and Hayes).
Namestnikov: Signed for 2 years
Spooner: Signed for 2 years
Fast: Signed for 3 years
Kreider: Signed for 2 years
Zibanejad: Signed for 4 years
I completely understand why you want Zuccarello to stay. You are definitely his biggest, or at least most obvious, fan. But when you look at the team and the position we are in, it certainly makes sense to trade Zuccarello at the deadline.
All in on Chris Krieder. Smart guy, handles himself well in front of a camera, and making him Captain checks the "leadership" box and will inflate his value when it's time to deal him to the highest bidder at next year's trade deadline if we aren't yet in compete mode.