So, you just toss out Gordie Howe's career when talking hockey greats? Never happened?I hate to be that guy but it’s kinda reasonable not to count anything before like 1970 and since then the answer has to be Leetch.
The same reason no one really counts Norm Van Brocklin or YA Tittle or Otto Graham among the NFL’s all time great QBs anymore. It’s a different game.
So, you just toss out Gordie Howe's career when talking hockey greats? Never happened?
No but it has to be contextualized. He goes down as a hockey great but then there is always the asterisk “but he was great when there were only 6 teams in the league mostly.”
It’s a different level of competition and a different level of athlete. It will be the same 80 years in the future as it is talking about Howe who began his career in like 1942, almost 80 years ago now. People will be like, yeah, that Wayne Gretzky was amazing, but he also played back when players didn’t have bionic limbs, so how good could he really have been? Etc.
As such I’m not really that interested in discussing what great NY Rangers were around in 1930. It’s fun for historians and important to remember, but any relevant conversation about the greatest will have to center around the Rangers who faced the greatest competition in the greatest era of hockey, which is the last 20, 30 years. Even the 1994 team is beginning to feel irrelevant to modern hockey discussions, even compared to like the ‘97 Redwings. The league changed a lot in those years. The Rangers felt like the last of the ‘80s teams in a way whereas those Redwings felt like the harbingers of the next decade or two until the Pens/Blackhawks/Kings/Bruins reigns started.
If we can't even include the '94 guys as the game has changed too much then our options for 'greatest ever' (with ever pretty much pointless if we're only working in the last 20 off years...) are basically Lundqvist, or 3 seasons of Jagr....
League was less watered down too, though. Competition must have been insane for those positions.No but it has to be contextualized. He goes down as a hockey great but then there is always the asterisk “but he was great when there were only 6 teams in the league mostly.”
It’s a different level of competition and a different level of athlete. It will be the same 80 years in the future as it is talking about Howe who began his career in like 1942, almost 80 years ago now. People will be like, yeah, that Wayne Gretzky was amazing, but he also played back when players didn’t have bionic limbs, so how good could he really have been? Etc.
As such I’m not really that interested in discussing what great NY Rangers were around in 1930. It’s fun for historians and important to remember, but any relevant conversation about the greatest will have to center around the Rangers who faced the greatest competition in the greatest era of hockey, which is the last 20, 30 years. Even the 1994 team is beginning to feel irrelevant to modern hockey discussions, even compared to like the ‘97 Redwings. The league changed a lot in those years. The Rangers felt like the last of the ‘80s teams in a way whereas those Redwings felt like the harbingers of the next decade or two until the Pens/Blackhawks/Kings/Bruins reigns started.
This.Leetch and it's not really debatable either.
Hey, I had dibs on that! Because of my nickname!Hollywood Hollweg
Thomas Pock immediately comes to mind
Buchnevich
Emile Francis
Team was crap until he took over and despite not winning the Cup the Rangers had a great run and was a top team for most of his tenure.