Sasha Orlov
Lord of the Manor
- Jun 22, 2018
- 8,275
- 28,003
Ya poster makes no sense with that take lol. Terrible analogy really.You can't pick and choose which provinces to include. I agree BC produces more talent now compared to Beliveau's era, but Quebec produces far less. The difference from Quebec is enormous. (There are two HOF skaters from Quebec who played 200+ games during Crosby's era - Bergeron and St. Louis. In Beliveau's era, you have both Richard bothers, Geoffrion, Keon, Lemaire, Moore, Ratalle, Gilbert, Cournoyer, Harvey, Pilote, Pronovost, Laperriere, Savard). Fine, adjust for Crosby facing a few more players from BC. But then adjust for Beliveau facing far more talent from Quebec. If want to adjust, then adjust for both players, otherwise you're just trying to prop up Crosby.
The conclusion that Crosby would have led the league in scoring ten years in a row is (to put it mildly) optimistic. Nobody in NHL history did that - not even Gretzky. Is Crosby better than Gretzky now?
"Nowhere close to being the same caliber of player". Beliveau is in the top ten on any credible list that I've seen (and usually closer to #5 than #10). If you want to rank Crosby ahead, that's fine. But saying that they're not the same calibre of playing is implying that Crosby is at the Gretzky/Orr level, and he obviously isn't.
Frank Nighbor vs KopitarBéliveau is top 10 all time
Crosby is my #5
Béliveau had top compete with some of the greatest player ever, and was never far behind (he was a comtemporary of Maurice Richard, Bobby Hull, Howe and Orr
Crosby was THE guy for almost 15 years, with only Ovechkin in his rear mirror
Béliveau, obviously, had much, much, much more success, team wise, being part of some of the greatest teams ever, the guy had 10 Stanley Cup as a player
Crosby has some cups too
Both of them are perceived as some of the greatest team captains ever. Béliveau is the greatest gentleman to ever played the game, Crosby is up there
Overall, two legends, but edge to Crosby
Béliveau is top 10 all time
Crosby is my #5
Béliveau had top compete with some of the greatest player ever, and was never far behind (he was a comtemporary of Maurice Richard, Bobby Hull, Howe and Orr
Crosby was THE guy for almost 15 years, with only Ovechkin in his rear mirror
Béliveau, obviously, had much, much, much more success, team wise, being part of some of the greatest teams ever, the guy had 10 Stanley Cup as a player
Crosby has some cups too
Both of them are perceived as some of the greatest team captains ever. Béliveau is the greatest gentleman to ever played the game, Crosby is up there
Overall, two legends, but edge to Crosby
Bobby Orr was born 16.5 years after Beliveau. They weren’t contemporaries in any meaningful way.
And no, Sidney Crosby was not THE guy for 15 years. Dude has 2 Harts which came in the only 2 seasons where he led the NhL in points. Ovechkin has 3 consecutive seasons that are all clearly better than Crosby’s best season.
They are close but Crosby is clearly ahead and it's extremely hard to state overwise and have it stand up to scrutiny.Any pick that isn't qualified as being very close is not reasonable.
Both looked very good in the eras they played in.
120>112 know? I thought thats the way it works around hereBobby Orr was born 16.5 years after Beliveau. They weren’t contemporaries in any meaningful way.
And no, Sidney Crosby was not THE guy for 15 years. Dude has 2 Harts which came in the only 2 seasons where he led the NhL in points. Ovechkin has 3 consecutive seasons that are all clearly better than Crosby’s best season.
Not when more than half are from the powerplay. Let’s admit that Crosby doesn’t have signature season most superstars have such as Kuch 2024, McDavid 2023, Ovi 2008 due to injuries. That doesn’t take away from his greatness of course.120>112 know? I thought thats the way it works around here
Na just a measley 17 point art ross winNot when more than half are from the powerplay. Let’s admit that Crosby doesn’t have signature season most superstars have such as Kuch 2024, McDavid 2023, Ovi 2008 due to injuries. That doesn’t take away from his greatness of course.
Crosby.
Unfortunately, I can take playing for stacked Montreal squads only so seriously.
Beliveau won less Harts, less Art Rosses, and led the league in goals the same number of times. I’m on here constantly battling against phantom hardware when it comes to Crosby, but I always give him as much credit as the opposing side can for his likeliness of winning 2010-2011 and 2012-2013 for at least 2 Harts, 2 Art Rosses, and 1 Lindsay—not a relevant trophy here since the Pearson was introduced during Beliveau’s final season.
Beliveau led his team in scoring just three times before the age of 32 and six times overall during the seventeen full seasons he played from 1954-1955 through 1970-1971.
I think Crosby passed him many years ago.
Besides those 3 seasons OV is a non factorBobby Orr was born 16.5 years after Beliveau. They weren’t contemporaries in any meaningful way.
And no, Sidney Crosby was not THE guy for 15 years. Dude has 2 Harts which came in the only 2 seasons where he led the NhL in points. Ovechkin has 3 consecutive seasons that are all clearly better than Crosby’s best season.
Being number #1 all time goal scorer is hardly a disappointment. I get what you mean though, I wish he hadn’t shifted from a dynamic scoring and playmaking puck carrier to a pure sniper. That shift ruled out any more Art Ross wins he had in store. If Ovi maintained his playstyle all the way to 2018, there’s a big five when it comes to all time rankings but oh well can’t dwell on what could’ve been.Besides those 3 seasons OV is a non factor
Look at his scoring finishes post 2011 he stunk
Crosby had a 1.27 ppg from 2011-2017 while OV had 0.97 the same period
06 - 10 OV was ~10% better than 06-10 Crosby (ppg wise Crosby was 1.36 vs 1.34 for OV) as he passed the eye test and actual production test
2011-2017 crosby ~40% better than OV from this period.
11 - 17 OV stopped any chance of OV being ranked higher than Mcdavid, Hasek, and Crosby for 5th, 6th, and 7th all time
He is 8th at best if you take him over Bobby hull and 10th at worst if you take him after Hull and Jagr.
OV had no injuries excuses. He had the excellent start to his career and should have ended #2/3 all time. He had an incredibly disapointing last 15 years to not a top 3-5 player all time.
With crosbys injuries in 11-13 he should have won major awards from 2011-2013 and even 2014 and 2016 should have been a lot better
OV being the GOAT goal scorer in 2020 placed him top 15 all time at the worstBeing number #1 all time goal scorer is hardly a disappointment. I get what you mean though, I wish he hadn’t shifted from a dynamic scoring and playmaking puck carrier to a pure sniper. That shift ruled out any more Art Ross wins he had in store. If Ovi maintained his playstyle all the way to 2018, there’s a big five when it comes to all time rankings but oh well can’t dwell on what could’ve been.
Besides those 3 seasons OV is a non factor
Thats fine you are an OV fanboy so not expecting you would realize how drastic OVs falloff post 2010 was as a player and the impact it had on his legacy all time (shot at being top 3-5 vs 8-10 alp time with a lot of players right around that tier or those who can pass him in a few years)That’s is absurd. I didn’t bother reading the rest of your post.
From an Art Ross standpoint it’s true. Obviously Ovi had years where he was the best player between 2011-2017. He just wasn’t the point producer he once was during 2006-2010.That’s is absurd. I didn’t bother reading the rest of your post.
Thats fine you are an OV fanboy so not expecting you would realize how drastic OVs falloff post 2010 was as a player and the impact it had on his legacy all time (shot at being top 3-5 vs 8-10 alp time with a lot of players right around that tier or those who can pass him in a few years)
From an Art Ross standpoint it’s true. Obviously Ovi had years where he was the best player between 2011-2017. He just wasn’t the point producer he once was during 2006-2010.
Man I watched a lot of the games as wellUnlike you, I watched the games.
You are wildly wrong.