Player Discussion Who had the better world junior tourney

Who had the best tourney?

  • Joshua Roy

    Votes: 25 18.4%
  • Riley Kidney

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Jan Mysak

    Votes: 109 80.1%
  • Petteri Numri

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Oliver Kapanen

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    136

jaffy27

From Russia wth Pain
Nov 18, 2007
25,564
23,466
Orleans
Voted for Roy, Mysak was always supposed to be dominant, he's over 20...if you voted for Mysak, you just didn't factor in the age...
But that wasn’t the question….

It’s simply who had the better WJC

When they vote for the Norris, they don’t factor in age, it’s just who was the best defensemen.

Who was most impressive player may be Roy, the word impressive is exactly that, who impressed you the most.

It’s how I see it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Redux91

bopeep

Registered User
Jan 22, 2004
1,881
2,720
bc
But that wasn’t the question….

It’s simply who had the better WJC

When they vote for the Norris, they don’t factor in age, it’s just who was the best defensemen.

Who was most impressive player may be Roy, the word impressive is exactly that, who impressed you the most.

It’s how I see it
Everything seems to be about semantics during these dog days of summer... If it's not about who had the "best" tournament vs. the most "impressive" or dominant, it 's arguing at length about the definition of "consensus"...

Let's just play some frickin' hockey already and it'll keep these discussions about the subtleties of the English language to a minimum :nod:
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27 and Redux91

SOLR

Registered User
Jun 4, 2006
13,250
6,808
Toronto / North York
But that wasn’t the question….

It’s simply who had the better WJC

When they vote for the Norris, they don’t factor in age, it’s just who was the best defensemen.

Who was most impressive player may be Roy, the word impressive is exactly that, who impressed you the most.

It’s how I see it

Who had the best WJC vs. where they should be - is always at the core of having "the better WJC" in a development situation.

The Norris is for a bunch of adults, they have arrived, and it's the top competition, no need to put an asterisk on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McGuires Corndog

SOLR

Registered User
Jun 4, 2006
13,250
6,808
Toronto / North York
Everything seems to be about semantics during these dog days of summer... If it's not about who had the "best" tournament vs. the most "impressive" or dominant, it 's arguing at length about the definition of "consensus"...

Let's just play some frickin' hockey already and it'll keep these discussions about the subtleties of the English language to a minimum :nod:
Semantics is at the core of survey design - this is not a summer thing.

As soon as we introduce the word "better", the question "better than what" becomes highly relevant and of multiple correct angles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andrei79

L4br3cqu3

Matter of principle.
Sponsor
May 5, 2002
7,042
4,369
La Tuque
My answer to the question of the poll is Mysak, he was the best scorer and leader of a -very- average team.

My answer to who has the most potential, it's Roy, but that's not the question of this poll.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad