Pouliot will be waived.
Brad Boyes 1m Benoit Pouliot 1.3m
Maybe - maybe not.
Pouliot is the epitome of a lazy Sather signing. Oh, we need skill? Sure, sign this guy - he was drafted 4th overall one year.
Pouliot will be waived.
Brad Boyes 1m Benoit Pouliot 1.3m
...next will be Kreider being traded.
i would keep pouliot. his skating and size are just too good to dump imo. i would say zuc and pyatt are gone before pouliot.
kreider being traded is interesting. i would need something of real value coming back but would certainly listen. another one whos value may drop if he doesnt light it up in the A.
same with mcilrath, would like to see what value he has. im afraid, not that much ...![]()
i would keep pouliot. his skating and size are just too good to dump imo. i would say zuc and pyatt are gone before pouliot.
kreider being traded is interesting. i would need something of real value coming back but would certainly listen. another one whos value may drop if he doesnt light it up in the A.
same with mcilrath, would like to see what value he has. im afraid, not that much ...![]()
I don't get people killing the Pouliot move. It was a low risk high reward type move that obviously has not worked the past 6 games. If anything, he's either waived and claimed, or he goes down to the pack with a small burden for the year. On Sathers end, it was a good move looking at his 5 v 5 numbers. We know he's maddeningly inconsistent, that's why we were able to get him for peanuts. If he is this terrible after 20 games, he's a goner. Same goes for Pyatt, who arguably has been even worse then Pouliot. These guys have to perform or their gone. But I don't understand people who consistently kill Sather for moves that are smart from an economical standpoint that have low to no risk for this signing.
Right now he's terrible, give it 20 games and Krieder will have to take his spot.
I don't get people killing the Pouliot move. It was a low risk high reward type move that obviously has not worked the past 6 games. If anything, he's either waived and claimed, or he goes down to the pack with a small burden for the year. On Sathers end, it was a good move looking at his 5 v 5 numbers. We know he's maddeningly inconsistent, that's why we were able to get him for peanuts. If he is this terrible after 20 games, he's a goner. Same goes for Pyatt, who arguably has been even worse then Pouliot. These guys have to perform or their gone. But I don't understand people who consistently kill Sather for moves that are smart from an economical standpoint that have low to no risk for this signing.
Right now he's terrible, give it 20 games and Krieder will have to take his spot.
I don't get people killing the Pouliot move. It was a low risk high reward type move that obviously has not worked the past 6 games. If anything, he's either waived and claimed, or he goes down to the pack with a small burden for the year. On Sathers end, it was a good move looking at his 5 v 5 numbers. We know he's maddeningly inconsistent, that's why we were able to get him for peanuts. If he is this terrible after 20 games, he's a goner. Same goes for Pyatt, who arguably has been even worse then Pouliot. These guys have to perform or their gone. But I don't understand people who consistently kill Sather for moves that are smart from an economical standpoint that have low to no risk for this signing.
Right now he's terrible, give it 20 games and Krieder will have to take his spot.
Pouliot is the type of guy that a team with an existing solid roster brings in for depth. From the beginning, Pouliot was going to be depended upon to produce here, likely in a top 6 role. Thats unfair to him considering his sketchy past, and is setting him up for failure.
More importantly, when is the last time one of these "low risk" signings actually worked out for the Rangers (especially at forward)? It actually takes legwork to find those type of gems that produce something -- Sather doesn't have the time for that
I don't want a high priced player who's not committed enough to stay well conditioned. Build it up from the core and keep them young, hungry, and competitive. That's what brought this team out of the doldrums before and it's a recipe for success. Besides who wants Asham anyway.
- Put Cally on LTIR for 10 games (he needs to heal)
[*]Trade MDZ & Asham for Big Buff and a 5th
- Flip T Pyatt for Tootoo (maybe in a 3 way?)
- Sign Vinny Prospal $1m + $1m
Too much is made it off Buff being out of shape every year. The guy has put up 140pts in his last 197GP .71PPG which is better than all but what two of our forwards?
He's not a show starter or anything either just out of shape for camp.
If you can get him for MDZ and not much else I think you have to.
I'd take him for sure. He brings elements that this team sorely lacks.
Size. Ba-dum-bum.
I think it would cost much more than MDZ but if not I'd certainly make that trade.Too much is made it off Buff being out of shape every year. The guy has put up 140pts in his last 197GP .71PPG which is better than all but what two of our forwards?
He's not a show starter or anything either just out of shape for camp.
If you can get him for MDZ and not much else I think you have to.
I think it would cost much more than MDZ but if not I'd certainly make that trade.
The Rangers have too many forward prospects all around the same age pushing for spots:
Kristo
Yogan
Bourque
Kreider
Miller
Fast
Lindberg
Hrivik
Jean
If they need to move another piece, I would expect it to be one of those players. Obviously some look like they have no future in the NHL (Bourque, Jean)
im really a fan of Yogan... with NYR needing size and grit especially on the roster, i hope he makes it as a Ranger sometime soon. he didnt look bad and out of place in preseason.. hopefully a midseason call up. Yogan is another forward that can play 2 positions center and LW.... good problem to have like Miller.... and wasnt Kreider drafted as a center http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=120939
maybe Kreider back to center??
That would be a bad trade for the Jets. I follow them closely, 2nd to the Rangers. They would need an upgrade at Center, dynamic forward or defensive dman in return. Del Z seems redundant on the Jets. Trading Buff on the open market could give them substantial return.
Pouliot is the type of guy that a team with an existing solid roster brings in for depth. From the beginning, Pouliot was going to be depended upon to produce here, likely in a top 6 role. Thats unfair to him considering his sketchy past, and is setting him up for failure.
More importantly, when is the last time one of these "low risk" signings actually worked out for the Rangers (especially at forward)? It actually takes legwork to find those type of gems that produce something -- Sather doesn't have the time for that