Grifter3511
Registered User
- Nov 3, 2009
- 2,817
- 3,166
Playing in the nhl is their job. They do it day in, day out, 8-9 months of the year. You think players get excited to fly into Utah on a Wednesday night in February, or for an afternoon game in Seattle on a Sunday in November? Same shit, different day for the majority of the year.Get real. Making millions (NHLers get paid for regular season only) is exponentially more meaningful to players than playing for their country.
You'd be hard pressed to find an NHLer who will voluntarily terminate his contract to play in a best-v-best.
I have a job that covers my cost of living, and it's a job that most would consider somewhat meaningful, but there are numerous things that I do outside of my job that I find more meaningful than my job. Would I give up my job for them? Of course not, I need to live and they don't pay my bills. But livelihood and 'meaningfulness' or whatever you want to call it are not synonymous.
Of course players would rather make millions. It's not an either or. But I bet every single player who made their international team is more excited about this change of routine than they are about any single regular season games they'll play.
Edit: it would be interesting to get a non-NHL sanctioned anonymous poll from players in the NHL who didn't make their national teams on whether they would give up the two week break to play for their country if asked, or if they'd prefer the time off.