I don't expect a trade from our D either - not before the draft. Any forward we get back would have to be protected and that means going 7-3-1.
Which probably would prompt vegas to take McNabb instead of Lewis. Why? Because taking McNabb would hurt us the most. If a pick doesn't help them that much then they will look to see what hurts us. We are vegas' main geographic/division rivals.
They aren't here to do us any favors. they can improve simply by hurting their rivals.
Taking McNabb in this situation leaves us with 2 vets and Forbort, Gravel, and LaDue. Two second year guys and a rookie. LaDue is still a rookie. Plus we have no one in the 6-7 spots. A strength is now instantly a weakness again.
I think Vegas takes Forbort over McNabb if you go this route. Hard to say who LA values more but I think they don't want to lose Forbort.
McNabb must be exposed no matter what to meet requirements of expansion I believe.
If they move Amart, they can go the 7-3-1 road and protect Lewis.
I think Vegas will get enough dman, they need quality forwards. Lewis would be my pick.
LA could also throw them an incentive not to take Lewis or McNabb.
Or
Vegas can take McNabb and trade him.
So many variables.