I would be livid if we took Tkachuk at 3 over Zadina.
Tkachuk at 8, on the other hand, would be a steal.
Also, I don't think it counts for much, but Tkachuk is Hayes' cousin.
Unless we move into the top 3 (I really think we do by the way the league “owes” us big time) give me Farabee at 8. Really good at all levels and an UNBELIEVABLY high compete motor. A slightly bigger version of Zack Parise
I am still on Dobson. Then see if you can engineer a trade to move up for Farabee. But Dobson smacks on the type of cornerstone defenseman they need. Providing that he pans out.Unless we move into the top 3 (I really think we do by the way the league “owes” us big time) give me Farabee at 8. Really good at all levels and an UNBELIEVABLY high compete motor. A slightly bigger version of Zack Parise
I was a Bouchard over Dobson guy to start, due to what I perceived to be the former's puck and skating skills vs. what I perceived to be the latter's size and big shot.
But there is something to be said for the fact that Bouchard looks like a guy who is simply more physically developed at a younger age than his peers (seriously, if he was a baseball prospect from Cuba, you'd think he'd doctored his birth certificate). And there is definitely something to be said for the fact that Dobson is as good as he is while still having tons of room to grow/improve. If it comes down to a choice between the two, I think I now take the latter (though, honestly, I'd be thrilled to have either).
Then again, if they stay at 8 and Wahlstrom or Tkachuk is still on the board when they pick, I take either over the defenseman.
Man, this is such a good draft to have this many picks. June can't get here soon enough.
I hear what you’re saying, but in a draft this deep, I’d prefer to keep most of our picks in the top 100. Maybe combine Zucc with one of the picks to bump it up ~15 spots?Personally, I would trade both our other 1st round picks and additional piece or two to move into the Top 12.
Give me one of: Boqvist/Dobson/Bouchard
And one of: Wahlstrom/Farabee/Tkachuk
Or, in an ideal world, we win the Lotto and draft Dahlin and then trade up and get one of the aforementioned forwards.
Or, we get the 2nd pick for Svech or 3rd pick for Zadina and trade up to get one of the aforementioned Defensemen.
What if the Top 4 or 5 go something like
1. Dahlin
2. Svech
3. Boqvist/Tkachuck/Bouchard
4. Boqvist/Tkachuck/Bouchard
5. Boqvist/Tkachuck/Bouchard
Would our 8th overall + Tampa pick 28-31 overall be good enough to move up to 5 or 6 to take Zadina? Then use the Boston pick on Kaut
Going off that logic a team would never trade a pick away when a player fell a few spotsWell, no, because the teams picking at that spot would want Zadina.
This.I am still on Dobson. Then see if you can engineer a trade to move up for Farabee. But Dobson smacks on the type of cornerstone defenseman they need. Providing that he pans out.
Going off that logic a team would never trade a pick away when a player fell a few spots
Maybe someone like Arizona doesn't want another scoring winger and would rather move back a couple spots to get another 1st; or maybe a team like Montreal would rather have multiple 1sts to restock their cupboard.
But it does happen. I'm not debating the odds here.My point was before, as it is now - this almost never happens because the player one team wants is BPA, and that's how teams should draft.
Teams don't usually draft for volume, or position as they shouldn't. They draft for BPA, therefore trading down doesn't happen often.
As was originally said to the original suggestion "why don't we just trade down" .... because it's not common, or easy.
Are you at least ok w/ Hughes at 8?if our draft goes anything like that one i'll be livid
Dobson/Boqvist/Hughes and Farabee would be an amazing outcome.
Are you at least ok w/ Hughes at 8?