Which team is the most villainous?

Most villainous team?

  • Anaheim Ducks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Buffalo Sabres

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Calgary Flames

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Carolina Hurricanes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Colorado Avalanche

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Colombus Blue Jackets

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Detroit Red Wings

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Montreal Canadiens

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nashville Predators

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • New York Islanders

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Philadelphia Flyers

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • San Jose Sharks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Seattle Kraken

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • St. Louis Blues

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tampa Bay Lightning

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Utah Hockey Club

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Vancouver Canucks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Washington Capitals

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Winnipeg Jets

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    73

Devilsfan2326

Registered User
Oct 4, 2011
913
397
Every bit of entertainment needs a storyline between a cowboy and an outlaw, like a movie script, or wrestling if needed. To keep people watching. Does hockey still have that to the degree that you enjoy? Which team stands out? Try not to let past teams and their nicknames shade your perspective about who the "antagonists" are today. Include in the comments specific players!

Please wait for poll.

I've decided this could include current players, coaches, broadcast teams, or any of the management.
 
Last edited:

Fledgemyhedge

Registered User
Apr 24, 2014
3,078
4,175
bob
this was always the bruins for me. I even felt like their fans embraced this role but they’re pretty likeable these days minus Marchand. Unfortunately I don’t get that vibe from any team currently so I’ll just vote for them
 

banks

Only got 3 of 16.
Aug 29, 2019
3,847
5,663
I considered:

Bruins. They've traditionally a physical, big, bad, "bully" type of team.
Red Wings: They were like the Empire from Star Wars for a while there. Just endless an ominous.
Golden Knights: They've been so cut-throat with player movement since they came to the league, and their instant success made a lot of enemies.

But I voted for:

NJ Devils: With a name like "devils" how can they not be a villain??
 

Devilsfan2326

Registered User
Oct 4, 2011
913
397
I considered:

Bruins. They've traditionally a physical, big, bad, "bully" type of team.
Red Wings: They were like the Empire from Star Wars for a while there. Just endless an ominous.
Golden Knights: They've been so cut-throat with player movement since they came to the league, and their instant success made a lot of enemies.

But I voted for:

NJ Devils: With a name like "devils" how can they not be a villain??
Good point! I've wondered that maybe some players have refused to sign there due to the name. Doesn't get discussed very much, but I could see that.
 

Xirik

Registered User
Sep 24, 2014
9,943
14,749
Alberta
Rangers

The badguy that has all the money and everything comes easy to them while you suffer defeats against them and slowly get better from hard work and guts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devilsfan2326

Devilsfan2326

Registered User
Oct 4, 2011
913
397
Rangers

The badguy that has all the money and everything comes easy to them while you suffer defeats against them and slowly get better from hard work and guts.
Gomez! Gaborik! Nash! Honestly think most fans have to admit it’s a long list of big time free agents going there in their twilight years…
 

I Hate Blake Coleman

Bandwagon Burner
Jul 22, 2008
24,300
8,406
Saskatchewan
Vegas f***ed MAF over. They got some comeuppance with Lehner being a f***ing weirdo headache but they still won a Cup, which is proof that karma and gods and cosmic justice does not exist, that we as fans and more generally humans are subject to organized chaos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coffey

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad