HockeyVirus
16/34/88/91/44 - Pathetic losers
- Nov 15, 2020
- 21,167
- 32,304
I gotta say Bill Zito. Seems like every move he's made has been the right one. Cups don't lie.
Did I miss something?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ced9/0ced946c8f7e3e7fd16d9e24a92d7fdf27a1265d" alt="S6tawjI.png"
I gotta say Bill Zito. Seems like every move he's made has been the right one. Cups don't lie.
They either played a fifth round or won four best-of-nine series convincingly.20-4? Is this some voodoo?
Now to the other thread to make sure Geoge McPhee is in the worst GM category.Brian McLellan took over a Caps team that was in serious danger of flaming out and basically instantly transformed it back into the best team in the league and finally got over the hump in 2018. He then also orchestrated by far the most successful "retool" any NHL team has attempted.
Second highest winning percentage of any GM in NHL history.
Did I miss something?
![]()
Dean LombardiThe opposite of a previous trend. Which one GM did an astronomical amount of good for the team that hired him? No particular time period, you can give one that is either historical or current. Ideally current though.
He could also be referring to bikini size. They are in S Florida after allDid I miss something?
![]()
McPhee was a good GM with some fatal flaws ("I like our D") while he was with the Caps. Not a great GM but also nowhere close to being the worst. MacLellan basically had all of MacPhee's good traits but also none of his bad ones.Now to the other thread to make sure Geoge McPhee is in the worst GM category.
20-4? Is this some voodoo?
I know you said current, but I just want to put this one out there:
Neil Smith took a mediocre New York Rangers team in 1989 and transformed them into a short term powerhouse. It's one of the more proactively successful GM jobs I can think of. The first couple of years were decent, but then between the summer of 1991 and the 1994 deadline, he traded for 13 of 18 skaters on the ice to win the Cup. He also was the first to risk taking a Russian in the first round, and Kovalev played a significant role in the Cup win. The only players on the team left over from his predecessor were Leetch and Richter (not insignificant pieces, of course).
There's no doubt that there's a downside to this. Some of the players he traded went on to have better careers than the Rangers stints for the players they were traded for (Amonte and Weight, in particular). Plus, Smith was convinced by the 94 deadline that he'd be able to pull off similar moves and they mainly backfired. The end of his tenure was NOT great.
I just think it's a really interesting example of a GM vastly improving a team in a short period of time mostly through trades.
It was one of those deal with the devil scenarios where he went all in knowing they'd have a great chance to win the cup but would struggle long term/after the cup win.
I think this is the right answerThe New Jersey Devils probably don't exist if they hadn't hired Lou Lamoriello in 1987