Speculation: Where does Russell sign?

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,303
13,532
How is Russell still unsigned? Is he looking for a 7 year deal or something?
 

serp

Registered User
Jan 17, 2016
21,047
13,014
I still think people are way too brutal on Russell. Be the first to admit that he sits too far back on defense when he should be more mobile but it worked.

He always saved or contributed to more goals than he allowed. Yes, he gets out corsi'd consistently but he doesn't let people get in behind him and he doesn't let shots around him go uncontested. That stuff matters. He is a pain to play against.

He has well above average skating and passing and is an excellent penalty killer.

Dallas misused him horribly. Played 11 games with them, 8 out of the last 10 he was given 23 minutes over over. Four of those games he was over 27 for TOI. That is outrageous! He is a solid #4. They used him as a top pairing guy. Four points in 11 games on a new team while being fed to the wolves is decent as well. With a better situation I think he can hit 35-40 points. Thought he was fine vs Minnesota but the whole Dallas team looked terrible against St Louis.


Somehow we could get rid of Wideman and Engellend and I would like the Flames to offer him 3.5M x 2

Edit; Just wanted to add I think Dallas picked the wrong ex-Flame to sign. Hamhuis can play the role that they tried to force Russell into and that would actually allow them to play Russell where he belongs.

He played that much when the Stars lost Klingberg, Demers and Jordie Benn to injury for a while. Someone had to play those minutes.

Regarding Hamhuis by the way . I firmly believe now Hamhuis was the Stars target but the stupid ownerfeud killed the damn thing and Nill had to settle for Russel. In the end it sucked for everyone but Calgary. We got an inferior player , the Canucks lost Hamhuis for absolutely nothing and Russel is still unsigned in early September.
 
Last edited:

Johnnybegood13

Registered User
Jul 11, 2003
8,736
996
Ramo was actually pretty good, considering the abysmal defense that was being played in front of him.
Ramo had a decent stretch before he tore his knee but he was flat out awful the first 3 months, letting in blueline goals or goal-line goals aren't defensive breakdowns.
 
Last edited:

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,403
34,167
Ramo had a decent stretch before he tore his knee but he was flat out awful the first 3 months, letting in blueline goals or goal-line goals aren't defensive breakdowns.

That stretch he was far more than decent. He was superb. He didn't have a great start, but neither did the D. But over the course of the season I think he was pretty good, far from awful - his quality starts percentage was over .541, higher than Anderson, Varlamov, Rinne, Dubnyk, Smith, Ward, Miller, Talbot, Bernier, Mason, Howard, Niemi, Lack, Bobrovski, Lehtonen and just below Jones, Rask, Darling, and Gibson. He wasn't excellent but he also wasn't the problem.

After the first month, he went 14-2-2 with a .917 sv%. That's pretty solid on a team that was so awful on the PK and at allowing high danger scoring chances.
 

Maukkis

EZ4ENCE
Mar 16, 2016
10,721
7,597
I said that by rejecting 17 million from Toronto, Russell lost at least half of that amount. Great job there.
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,792
4,120
Calgary
That stretch he was far more than decent. He was superb. He didn't have a great start, but neither did the D. But over the course of the season I think he was pretty good, far from awful - his quality starts percentage was over .541, higher than Anderson, Varlamov, Rinne, Dubnyk, Smith, Ward, Miller, Talbot, Bernier, Mason, Howard, Niemi, Lack, Bobrovski, Lehtonen and just below Jones, Rask, Darling, and Gibson. He wasn't excellent but he also wasn't the problem.

After the first month, he went 14-2-2 with a .917 sv%. That's pretty solid on a team that was so awful on the PK and at allowing high danger scoring chances.

Yep, after Ramo got sent down he really turned it around. His injury was just the final nail in the coffin. Hiller got like 6 games as a starter and blew them all.

Hope someone gives him a PTO at least. Still think he's a a solid 1B guy.
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,994
45,414
Dumping a guy with one year left like Smid would be costly... he's making $4m salary this season, almost a much as Bickell.
 

Smitty426

Registered User
Jun 25, 2006
4,566
990
Jersey
Russell possibly back with Calgary or maybe Boston or New Jersey still don't know.

Jersey could use him and some of his metrics fit the bill, I wonder what the issue is? I would guess term, because cash we have.

I also think some GMs are waiting for the Trouba/Lindholm dominoes to fall before they commit to final tightened up rosters
 
Nov 13, 2006
11,558
1,437
Ohio
Russell is a very good skater who can get the puck out of trouble and get it up ice. He blocks shots and is a serviceable 2nd pairing guy if Scott Howson was still in Edmonton I would have expected him to pitch Russell to the FO team

Now? Perhaps the Flames might offer him something
 

Smitty426

Registered User
Jun 25, 2006
4,566
990
Jersey
Russell is a very good skater who can get the puck out of trouble and get it up ice. He blocks shots and is a serviceable 2nd pairing guy if Scott Howson was still in Edmonton I would have expected him to pitch Russell to the FO team

Now? Perhaps the Flames might offer him something

He must want a truckload
 

Number1RedWingsFan52

Registered User
Mar 17, 2013
40,243
6,038
Winter Haven Florida
Jersey could use him and some of his metrics fit the bill, I wonder what the issue is? I would guess term, because cash we have.

I also think some GMs are waiting for the Trouba/Lindholm dominoes to fall before they commit to final tightened up rosters

I think Russell would be a perfect fit in New Jersey, Yeah i'm thinking he wants money that teams just aren't willing to give him we shall see.

Sounds like he's waiting for certain teams to shed some salary here it sounds like. Heard possibly back to Calgary plus the Boston and New Jersey names come up as well.
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,792
4,120
Calgary
Having Wideman and Russell as our 3rd pairing would be kind of sweet. They were way over their heads as a 1B pairing two years ago but they would do great as a 3rd pairing.

Smid is most likely going on LTIR so he's easy.
I think Engelland would make most teams 3rd pairing if we retained some money.
Wideman can also be a #5 and PP specialist on most teams.

I was really hoping for a busier summer from Treliving.
 

TrillMike

Registered User
Feb 21, 2012
6,337
528
Dallas, TX
Russell is a very good skater who can get the puck out of trouble and get it up ice. He blocks shots and is a serviceable 2nd pairing guy if Scott Howson was still in Edmonton I would have expected him to pitch Russell to the FO team

Now? Perhaps the Flames might offer him something
He did not look like a second pairing D during his stint in Dallas.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad