Where does Patrick Kane rank all time when he retires?

[Cursed Lemon]

Well he's better than Toews, so...make of that what you will.

 

[x Tame Impala]

Makes no sense to have so many options between 1-30 (30, 25, 20, 15, 10, 5) where no one in their right mind will vote for him but then to basically have no options in between 50-100 which is exactly where he will rank.

Should have more options between 50-100 to get granular and then just make "top 20" an option since no one thinks he's better than top 20 anyways.

I say he ends up in the high 50's or low 60's.

Agreed. I'm a huge Kane homer and i wouldn't put him in the top 30. There should be options for...

-top 50
-top 60
-top 70
-top 80
-top 90
-top 100
-below top 100 A.K.A. I don't know anything about hockey

 

[BigBadBruins7708]

75-ish

 

[Crow]

69th

 

[DitchMarner]

He's not top 50. It's a large range, but I guess I'd have him in the 51-100 range (closer to 100 than 50).

The guy could score points and was clutch in the playoffs, but he didn't do much other than score. I don't think you have to be great defensively to rank high all-time (guys like Jagr, Lafleur and Ovechkin are better than Kane and weren't anything special defensively), but he's a guy whose style simply did not translate to on-ice dominance to the extent that those of peak Jagr and Ovechkin did.