Where did Yzerman go wrong with the rebuild?

Hockeyville USA

Registered User
Dec 30, 2023
3,892
3,560
Central Ohio
Dallas is a team that we could mirror to some extent but I think it's a bit of a "best case scenario" deal. We would need every single guy basically to hit their potential top end of their ceiling but there are a lot of stylistic analogs between the two of them.

We probably don't have Robertson in our mix at the moment (Raymond being the closet in terms of elite 1st line Winger, but not a natural goal scorer like Robertson or has his size) - though I would argue that our upside of our blue line with Mo, Ed, ASP, and Cossa is probably higher than theirs?
Heiskanen > Seider

Edvinsson > Harley

Lindell >>> anything the Red Wings currently have

Sandin Pellikka >>> Bichsel

Oettinger >> Cossa (for now)
 

Twinger

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
108
54
Dallas is a team that we could mirror to some extent but I think it's a bit of a "best case scenario" deal. We would need every single guy basically to hit their potential top end of their ceiling but there are a lot of stylistic analogs between the two of them.

We probably don't have Robertson in our mix at the moment (Raymond being the closet in terms of elite 1st line Winger, but not a natural goal scorer like Robertson or has his size) - though I would argue that our upside of our blue line with Mo, Ed, ASP, and Cossa is probably higher than theirs?
I'd agree with our blue line being our strong point going forward. If we want to go this way we need a better system/coach. And that's something else to add to the list
 
  • Like
Reactions: ShakenNotStirred

Carmine Cirella

Registered User
Jun 29, 2023
27
54
It's been 6 drafts. With averaging over 2 second round picks per draft. With some truly astoundingly bad picks. Draper/Yzerman have zero clue on what to do outside the first round.
I can only recommend going to hockeydb.com and looking at draft lists by year. Even going back to 2021 you won't find many impact players (or even just established NHLers) outside like the top 10, not to mention anyone after the 2nd round. And again, that's for 2021. For 2022, 2023 and 2024 it's even rarer.

In terms of prospect development 4 or even 5 years is really not a long timeframe. Criticizing "It's been 6 drafts" seems to be missing this point.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,885
15,798
Dallas and Winnipeg are good examples of what this could turn into

Our scouting overall in North America (pro and amateur) has me doubting
The picks from the WHL have been pretty good. I think Wallin is based there?

Biggest issue is probably with whoever is scouting the USHL/USDP. Whoever signed off on drafting Cleveland, James, and Phelan.

We have barely picked any players from the OHL/QMJHL. Not sure why that is. There have been a bunch of good players from the OHL the last few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raymond23

heyfolks

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Apr 30, 2007
2,089
802
Soderblom is on his way back to Sweden very soon. WE all rooted for the guy, but he just doesn't have the skill for the NHL.



Draft round 2 onward


2019 - AJo
20 20- Wallinder
2021 - Buium, Mazur
2022 - Buchlenikov, Lombardi
2023 - Augustine, CLEVELAND, Finnie (Also the moves to make this draft ND, ASP and Augustine was solid work.)
2024 - I can't comment on this bunch. Not really following them.

1732555132970.png






I believe the numbers show the Wings are doing a solid job in the draft. I stand by my B+ and no, i don't give them an F- for 2nd onward. say again, it is not the draft, it is the UFAs. Outside of the net, not one of them is worth a damn but costing a fortune.

Tarasenko and Copp for Trouba. If they want D Copp and Gustaffson


 
  • Like
Reactions: TheOctopusKid

TheOctopusKid

Registered User
Sep 24, 2010
1,498
1,782
Soderblom is on his way back to Sweden very soon. WE all rooted for the guy, but he just doesn't have the skill for the NHL.

...Tarasenko and Copp for Trouba. If they want D Copp and Gustaffson...

Basically, the exact same sentiments. I don't actually think the 2nd Rd Drafting + has been all that bad. With any draft pick - you measure risk vs. reward, the deeper the round, the more uncertainly or the lower the ceiling/floor you need to accept for greater probability.

These are all dart throws to some extent.

FJDKLFJD!JKF@#!@# - but we need to dig up some steals!

I mean, I guess? The one think you cannot afford to do is miss on your 1st Rd picks - which the Wings have been absolutely stellar one. Conversely, we had more '2nd Rd+' steals but missed on basically every 1st Rd pick from like 2010 to 2019. We saw the outcome of that.

We ended up with Riley Sheahan over Kuznetsov, but neat? We scored on a short stint of Pulkkinen and Mrazek. The laundry list of Svechnikovs, Cholowskis, Manthas, Sheahans, Kindl, Smith, Rasmussen, Zadina, etc. THAT is kills you. Not that we aren't finding more and a way lower chance of probability: the next AA, or Nick Jensen, etc.

The Wings have been fine with their later round picks. Is it as many swings as some people want? Probably not but to say that we've failed when we have: Buchelnikov, Mazur, Wallinder, Johansson, Buium, Lombardi, Augustine - I don't see why we would be upset by this nor the other more depth oriented pieces as all of those guys have the potential upside celings, not just depth try-hards.
 

datsyukfan

Registered User
Jul 5, 2007
4,212
1,912
Basically, the exact same sentiments. I don't actually think the 2nd Rd Drafting + has been all that bad. With any draft pick - you measure risk vs. reward, the deeper the round, the more uncertainly or the lower the ceiling/floor you need to accept for greater probability.

These are all dart throws to some extent.

FJDKLFJD!JKF@#!@# - but we need to dig up some steals!

I mean, I guess? The one think you cannot afford to do is miss on your 1st Rd picks - which the Wings have been absolutely stellar one. Conversely, we had more '2nd Rd+' steals but missed on basically every 1st Rd pick from like 2010 to 2019. We saw the outcome of that.

We ended up with Riley Sheahan over Kuznetsov, but neat? We scored on a short stint of Pulkkinen and Mrazek. The laundry list of Svechnikovs, Cholowskis, Manthas, Sheahans, Kindl, Smith, Rasmussen, Zadina, etc. THAT is kills you. Not that we aren't finding more and a way lower chance of probability: the next AA, or Nick Jensen, etc.

The Wings have been fine with their later round picks. Is it as many swings as some people want? Probably not but to say that we've failed when we have: Buchelnikov, Mazur, Wallinder, Johansson, Buium, Lombardi, Augustine - I don't see why we would be upset by this nor the other more depth oriented pieces as all of those guys have the potential upside celings, not just depth try-hards.
I think it’s probably because none of them (save Johansson) are in the NHL yet.
 

Frk It

Mo Seider Less Problems
Jul 27, 2010
36,885
15,798
I would have liked to see us pick more players like Buchelnikov and Lombardi... But that said, Buchelnikov and Lombardi are having pretty strong seasons in the KHL and AHL. I personally think NDN will make that type of jump next year as well.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad