Lt Dan
F*** your ice cream!
they should extended Byfield on Febraury 23rd at 4:52 pm
This isn't specifically at you, but we're starting to get into Jack Johnson territory with these types of statements.If he wouldn't have been literally robbed of two assists (there's seriously no reason for it, these aren't 'almosts', one was taken away and one was a clear touch and both were primary) he'd be on a 55 point pace right this minute so it's not out of the question as some others seem to think.
This is the problem with basing any sort of opinion on statistics.He has one non-empty net point so far this season playing on the top line.
His value has never been lower, but there's a good chance it'll be lower after the next game. Then lower after the game after that, and so on.
Given that, he's probably still best advised to wait until the season's over, ask for a contract comparable to Stutzle, then after everyone stops laughing, sign a one-year prove-it deal and pray he finally turns things around next season.
I don't want to say "bust", yet, but he's actually worse than I thought he'd be when the Kings originally drafted him over Tim. What a disastrous pick for this team.
This isn't specifically at you, but we're starting to get into Jack Johnson territory with these types of statements.
Every time JJ would be on the ice for a minus, we'd always make an excuse "well actually it wasn't his fault because x, y and z." With QB it's "well he should have x amount of points right now."
I'm officially concerned.
The potential in his game is obvious, but there's just something missing right now. The way he's playing he's going to burn himself out just like he did last year.
A lot of those defenses were valid when he'd get a minus. He had his issues, but not every minus was his fault.This isn't specifically at you, but we're starting to get into Jack Johnson territory with these types of statements.
Every time JJ would be on the ice for a minus, we'd always make an excuse "well actually it wasn't his fault because x, y and z." With QB it's "well he should have x amount of points right now."
Which center will he be replacing?Its also worth noting that Byfield really should be put up the middle again ASAP. The Dubois acquisition has made it very difficult for either Byfield or Turcotte (who should be a full timer right now) to fulfill the roles they were drafted to perform.
DoneDoesn't matter what the Kings do with Byfield. They've already f***ed this up so badly that there's no chance they're winning shit with this collection of misfits.
Quote me.
To add to this, this is what we're now seeing with Zegras. He played his game and built his confidence to work his skillset into the NHL. Now that he's experienced and getting numbers, he's getting benched for needing to work on his team game.That being said, the biggest issue here is the expectation for young men to contribute immediately to what management thinks is a contender. Mistakes are amplified, organic growth isn't measured by personal play but by team results. Its the same problems dogging the Rangers kids. Too much at risk to allow for normal growing pains, and the pressure mounts. Its an inadvisable developmental plan, especially considering how unlikely it is for any real success anyway.
I mean, he had to spend the last few years learning to be a grinder. That's been the argument and a criticism of the Kings development - Byfield, Vilardi, Kaliyev, etc were all put in grinding roles and had initial struggles to varying degrees.I see some good there, but I see more from Lizotte. I was never a Byfield guy but I never once considered that he would be as ineffective as he is after 3 years. Am I wrong to say that he does 4th line stuff? After all this time, I’m still shocked when I see him make a nice play.
Quote me.
Kings and Rangers are the empirical evidence on what not to do with high draft picks. You cant develop and contend at the same time for the reasons you mentioned. So I would be for trading Byfield at this point. I do not think he will develop into a strong enough player in the window available with this misguided retry around 11 and 8. Byfield for Wallstedt would be something I'd look at.That being said, the biggest issue here is the expectation for young men to contribute immediately to what management thinks is a contender. Mistakes are amplified, organic growth isn't measured by personal play but by team results. Its the same problems dogging the Rangers kids. Too much at risk to allow for normal growing pains, and the pressure mounts. Its an inadvisable developmental plan, especially considering how unlikely it is for any real success anyway.
Ssh, I have a little secret for you...Kings and Rangers are the empirical evidence on what not to do with high draft picks. You cant develop and contend at the same time for the reasons you mentioned. So I would be for trading Byfield at this point. I do not think he will develop into a strong enough player in the window available with this misguided retry around 11 and 8. Byfield for Wallstedt would be something I'd look at.
haha.. good one. I guess im saying, if you're gonna trade pieces like Faber, Vilardi and firsts, why stop there... Wallstedt has a solid season under his belt in the A and could plug the goalie problem affordably and be around for the next rebuild.Ssh, I have a little secret for you...
There is no window here. Its just a polaroid from 10 years ago.
I think thats why you move him now before he presents more evidence that he's a D cupTrade him next season for an area of need if he doesn’t have a substantially better season than the previous one. There’s way too much risk for the Kings to invest more time into him and he’d be better suited for a lottery team that allows him to play top 6 center minutes.
If he doesn’t do much better this year than last year than he’s almost certainly a bust.
I’d wait for this year to pass even though his value would take a hit. But I wouldn’t be opposed to be moving him now either if there was a good offer for a goalie imo. Byfield just seems redundant.I think thats why you move him now before he presents more evidence that he's a D cup
Yeah but MIN would laugh at you. Not a chance in hell you get Wallstedt for Byfield straight up right now.Byfield for Wallstedt would be something I'd look at.
I doubt they would laugh, they'd probably ask for another piece or pick. My general point is the tiny window of Kopi's viability probably will not coincide with Byfield's emergence. And given that Blake has been mortgaging the future for the present, it seems to make sense to move him.Yeah but MIN would laugh at you. Not a chance in hell you get Wallstedt for Byfield straight up right now.
Well that I 100% agree with. I don't think moving him is the right choice, but based on how they're "building" this team, it's the logical move...and probably one they should have thought about doing a year or two ago.I doubt they would laugh, they'd probably ask for another piece or pick. My general point is the tiny window of Kopi's viability probably will not coincide with Byfield's emergence. And given that Blake has been mortgaging the future for the present, it seems to make sense to move him.
Half of Kempe's 40+ goals last year were empty net goals, also this year his 2 goals are empty net.He has one non-empty net point so far this season playing on the top line.
His value has never been lower, but there's a good chance it'll be lower after the next game. Then lower after the game after that, and so on.