What I'd like to see is NHL GMs be more responsible with high picks, specifically those 1st and 2nd overall picks that are not developed properly. Most 1 OA picks still need development at the lower levels.This idea sucks, why punish grown adults who can make a living in any other capacity? It's 18 for a reason, I'd you're a legal adult by the time training camp starts (Sept 15) you're able to play.
Look at what Crosby was able to accomplish at 18-19, McDavid too. Both of those guys were league MVPs before 20. Stamkos won a rocket at age 19 Matthews had 40 goals. MacKinnon was the best player in a playoff series, Pat Kane had 70 pts, Laine had 40 goals etc.
Lots of players are starts at 18/19 , including multiple award winners, why would we force those guys to wait an extra 2 years?
It's supposed to be a league for the best players , excluding elite 18/19 year olds would rob the league of star players, it's fine where it is
What would your plan for a regular season be with this format? 82 games is pretty excessive when everyone's guaranteed a spot.The playoffs should move to a 1-32, 2-31, 3-30, 4-29, 5-28, etc. format.
All teams get their shot. Top teams play bottom teams. Extra games, extra money, lots more fun.
I’ll argue this until the end of time. This idea does not suck at all, in fact, you suck. Drafting players at 18 is asinine. Very few players are immediately able to make an impact and you don’t even know what you have in a player until 20. It will improve scouting ten fold.This idea sucks, why punish grown adults who can make a living in any other capacity? It's 18 for a reason, I'd you're a legal adult by the time training camp starts (Sept 15) you're able to play.
Look at what Crosby was able to accomplish at 18-19, McDavid too. Both of those guys were league MVPs before 20. Stamkos won a rocket at age 19 Matthews had 40 goals. MacKinnon was the best player in a playoff series, Pat Kane had 70 pts, Laine had 40 goals etc.
Lots of players are starts at 18/19 , including multiple award winners, why would we force those guys to wait an extra 2 years?
It's supposed to be a league for the best players , excluding elite 18/19 year olds would rob the league of star players, it's fine where it is
Nah 18 is fine, they get their signing bonuses and money and most times they don't actually play at 18. Needing an exception is not needed, if they're good enough they're good enough. "Very few players" There is usually one every year, some players who were easily able to make the jump pre draftI’ll argue this until the end of time. This idea does not suck at all, in fact, you suck. Drafting players at 18 is asinine. Very few players are immediately able to make an impact and you don’t even know what you have in a player until 20. It will improve scouting ten fold.
Maybe you can make an exception for exceptional players, but I think 18 is just too young for various reasons.
Rolston was pretty good for the Bruins when they got him that trade deadline for nothing.Not to mention "counting stats" like pitcher wins were often used to judge how good a player was. Certain guys who either played on really good teams or had long careers weren't as good as most fans thought they were.
......
You have listed 21 players in a span of 18 years that have played well in their 18 year old season. Over 3,700 players have been drafted since 2005 and over 500 first rounders. Those aren’t great numbers.Nah 18 is fine, they get their signing bonuses and money and most times they don't actually play at 18. Needing an exception is not needed, if they're good enough they're good enough. "Very few players" There is usually one every year, some players who were easily able to make the jump pre draft
- Crosby (MVP at 19)
- Kane (calder and 70+ pts)
- Stamkos (rocket at 19)
- Doughty (olympic gold in his 2nd year)
- Tavares (led isles in pts as rookie)
- Duchene (55 pts)
- Hedman
- O'Reilly
- Hall
- Seguin (all-star in 19 yo season)
- RNH (52 pts 62 gp)
- Landeskog (Calder)
- MacKinnon (Calder, 10 pts in a series)
- Ekblad (Calder)
- McDavid (MVP in 19yo season)
- Eichel
- Matthews (Calder, 40 goals and 2nd in league)
- Laine (36 and 42 goals in teenage seasons)
- Hischier (50+ pts)
- Dahlin
- Stutzle
All of these guys were easily able to make NHL rosters right out of the draft many were stars by 19 and a few even superstars. Keeping the best players in the world out of the league and not allowing adults to earn their money in the top league is stupid. In the NBA you need to be 1 year removed from HS which is often 19, even that I don't like but 20 is asinine. The draft is a crapshoot but it means you need to do your homework more, and pushing it to 20 would only make is slightly less of one anyway. Teams who are good at scouting/developing players can reap the benefits of that. Needing an "exception" to play is the dumbest thing ever, no team would sign off on that because for instance this year the Blackhawks would be pushing for said exemption for Bedard and no other team would want it, because they would want their shot at him when he was eligible.
Its been 18 forever and its great, I love it when a player can come in at 18 and be a star, not allowing players like Crosby/McDavid to play in the league when they are literally the best players in the world would be a tragedy, because both were already MVPs at 19, Matthews/Laine were 40 goal scorers, Stammer won a hart, Kane was a 70 pt guy, MacKinnon 60+ pts and an amazing playoff series, etc. The league wants the best players to be playing there's no reason to keep them out of the league. If a guy isn't ready at 18 you can send him down, nobody is forcing you to play 18 year olds.
Again, exceptional player status would never work in the NHL and the other teams would block any efforts when a generational type player comes in.You have listed 21 players in a span of 18 years that have played well in their 18 year old season. Over 3,700 players have been drafted since 2005 and over 500 first rounders. Those aren’t great numbers.
I’d like to increase the odds of drafting NHL players and assuring their immediate impact in the NHL. There is way too much uncertainty with 18 years olds. The jumps from 18 to 19 to 20 are staggering and give you a much greater picture of the player’s potential. As previously stated, like in the CHL, players may be granted exceptional player status. However, the draft age would be set at 20.
You have listed 21 players in a span of 18 years that have played well in their 18 year old season. Over 3,700 players have been drafted since 2005 and over 500 first rounders. Those aren’t great numbers.
I’d like to increase the odds of drafting NHL players and assuring their immediate impact in the NHL. There is way too much uncertainty with 18 years olds. The jumps from 18 to 19 to 20 are staggering and give you a much greater picture of the player’s potential. As previously stated, like in the CHL, players may be granted exceptional player status. However, the draft age would be set at 20.
True enough that's why at age 20 I decided to not try out for my local Vancouver Canucks despite never really learning to skate of having ever played organized hockey and that's the real reason the Canucks never won the SC....Hockey is a simple game, and skating is not difficult.
It got worse when they insisted on every team playing each other once a season. Now you only see your division rivals 4 times instead of 8. If I want to see McDavid or Crosby I'll watch them on tv. I'd rather see rivalries come back. It's getting harder and harder now that we're closer to 3 dozen teams than 2The NHL is trying to build the game in the view of the minority of fans that want fighting and big hits removed in the hopes to attract other like minded fans, but when you ask non hockey fans what they like most about it, it's how fast, or violent and tough it is.
They want to see more big hits and fights. The minority fans want to see less, or none at all.
The skill game seems to remain constant in the game regardless of physicality, but enjoyment of games is less, as there's less going on.
NHL needs animosity back, but a better DoPS for when a player goes across the line.
first-round East vs West matchups coud be a nice way to change things up.-Rangers acquire Brian Rolston for the 2012 trade deadline and they win the Cup (yes I'm waiting for LOLs and I have thoughts and an answer ready).
-NHL should go back to the 1-16, 2-15, 3-14 playoff format.
I assume you're a Ducks fan?Hawks should pick Fantilli instead of Bedard.
Fantilli wins you Stanley Cups
Bedard is a small poor mans Connor McDavid circus act.