What wrong with "Mitch'in" Marner?

Status
Not open for further replies.

flyfysher

Registered User
Mar 21, 2012
6,555
5,191
He's soft. Plain and simple
POs are about physicality. Oddly enough, I was looking forward to seeing how Drouin would do in the POs before he got injured because he upped his defensive game this year and would finish his checks. So players can change if they want to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane

SeanMoneyHands

Registered User
Apr 18, 2019
14,253
13,065
Soft player who doesn't take any initiative on the ice. He was more interested in getting into verbal arguments with Nylander on the bench than being a leader. 3pts for him in the series is very disappointing. He was a complete non-factor in the series.
 

TheDawnOfANewTage

Dahlin, it’ll all be fine
Dec 17, 2018
12,503
18,369
That's not their culture , no yelling

There’s a difference between Babcock actually being a piece of shit, and giving a guy tough love when he needs it. Apparently f***in Nylander had to be that guy on the bench, I’m just wondering if that’s really not happening behind closed doors. It’s gotta be, but I also saw no indication that anyone said shit.
 

SImpelton

Registered User
Mar 1, 2018
582
705
When he was younger, he wasn't bad in the playoffs.

He put up some points but also competed and it seemed like he would be fine with more experience.

But now it seems like he has some sort of a mental block and he doesn't look very noticeable out there.

To be honest, his skills seem to have diminished somewhat in general. He gets his assists but seems less dynamic and not as skillful with the puck or as good at driving the play offensively.
He's on a team that can't generate offense from the blueline. They've got a couple guys who are... kinda average, but the bloated cap hits for the forwards mean they can't spend on defense, so they kinda just have to take whatever they can get from the farm and the scrap heap.

Some forwards can thrive despite limited talent on defense, because they can create offense on their own. others require the blueliners that require the other team to take them seriously as offensive players, prevent the opposing team from collapsing on 1-2 key guys. I think Marner is the latter, he needs support to be at his best, good feed ins from the blue line, some physical backup, a timely pinch or two, and if the Leafs get that at all it's completely by accident.
 

Chaos2k7

Believe!
Aug 10, 2003
11,831
10,435
Costa Rica
How can you not understand that Slaf being a bit of a mystery box is part of the equation of the poll?

Take the regular season superstar that underachieves big time during the playoffs or take the 6'3 1st overall pick powerforward that hasn't played in the playoffs yet, but has all the attributes to be a good playoff performer.

The poll is really not hard to understand.
Because doing it and saying you should be able to do it, is the exact conundrum the Leafs find themselves in with Marner now. Except one is a somewhat proven commodity.

I see why you are excited for Slaf but it's too soon to be pumping tires without seeing actual results.

It's the same bullcrap Leafs fans pull out every summer to self confirm their hopes that every next season will be the one they finally break through.

Be better than that.
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
20,651
26,898
Because doing it and saying you should be able to do it, is the exact conundrum the Leafs find themselves in with Marner now. Except one is a somewhat proven commodity.

I see why you are excited for Slaf but it's too soon to be pumping tires without seeing actual results.

It's the same bullcrap Leafs fans pull out every summer to self confirm their hopes that every next season will be the one they finally break through.

Be better than that.

With that logic, if given the choice between Jarnkrok and Celebrini for next regular season, you would take Jarnkrok? One is a proven commodity and the other is a complete mystery box...
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukeofjive

Chaos2k7

Believe!
Aug 10, 2003
11,831
10,435
Costa Rica
With that logic, if given the choice between Jarnkrok and Celebrini for next regular season, you would take Jarnkrok? One is a proven commodity and the other is a complete mystery box...
Moving the goalposts won't do it, Marner is not Jarnkrok, and Slaf is not Celebrini, both have proven more than the latter examples.

But one has 50 games playoff experience, to 0. Marner for all his warts still produces at a higher level in the playoffs over his career than Slaf has ever done in the regular season.

Your desire to project success over the other is based upon nothing but speculation on your part, at this point.
 

VainGretzky

Registered User
Jun 4, 2015
13,548
11,721
Matthews deserves heat.

69 goals, can't fight through a stomach bug and has an average game 7 once again
Ya funny how they single out Marner but no shade on Matthews Marner and Matthews both produce at the exact same rate in the playoffs, .87 PPG Nylander is even worse .80
when your team is built around those 3 players you would expect a lot more production from them . It's their core all of them are not good enough to lead a team to a championship the track record proves this
 

Kudo Shinichi

Registered User
Apr 20, 2012
20,651
26,898
Moving the goalposts won't do it, Marner is not Jarnkrok, and Slaf is not Celebrini, both have proven more than the latter examples.

But one has 50 games playoff experience, to 0. Marner for all his warts still produces at a higher level in the playoffs over his career than Slaf has ever done in the regular season.

Your desire to project success over the other is based upon nothing but speculation on your part, at this point.

Marner plays like a Jarnkrok player level in the playoffs, and Celebrini is absolutely not more proven than Slaf.

Marner is still going to produce assists playing the huge minute he does with the great offensive players he plays with. It hasn't helped his goalscoring though. He has 6 goals in his last 43 playoff games. Those are brutal numbers. Nylander scored half of that amount in just 4 games in these series.

Add to it the fact that Marner is soft, doesn't take hits to make plays, loses many puck battles, and hasn't been good defensively...

Even if Slaf were to not produce as many points as Marner, his impact on the ice would be far greater because he's physical, is a beast along the boards, wins a ton of puck battles, block shots, etc. His positive impact goes far beyond points, and its not like we're talking about an unskilled player. We're talking about a 1st overall pick who scored 42 pts in his last 51 nhl games in his 19 year old season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Farmboy Patty

Chaos2k7

Believe!
Aug 10, 2003
11,831
10,435
Costa Rica
Marner plays like a Jarnkrok player level in the playoffs, and Celebrini is absolutely not more proven than Slaf.

Marner is still going to produce assists playing the huge minute he does with the great offensive players he plays with. It hasn't helped his goalscoring though. He has 6 goals in his last 43 playoff games. Those are brutal numbers. Nylander scored half of that amount in just 4 games in these series.

Add to it the fact that Marner is soft, doesn't take hits to make plays, loses many puck battles, and hasn't been good defensively...

Even if Slaf were to not produce as many points as Marner, his impact on the ice would be far greater because he's physical, is a beast along the boards, wins a ton of puck battles, block shots, etc. His positive impact goes far beyond points, and its not like we're talking about an unskilled player. We're talking about a 1st overall pick who scored 42 pts in his last 51 nhl games in his 19 year old season.
Would be, could be, possibly is.

If that's good enough for you, cool.

Seems like a desperate attempt to make a Habs player relevant to this conversation without achieving anything.

Marner is more proven than Jarnkrok, and Slaf is more proven than Celebrini, it helps if you read and comprehend what you responding to. It doesn't make any part of you scenario valid at this time.

The Hockey News cover suggesting the Leafs were locks to win cups and asking how many they would win, was just as ridiculous as this take now.

Slaf may be great, maybe he will be even better, but it isn't even a valid question at this point.
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
41,630
50,662
He’d be a way better player if people stopped putting Shambles in his Brain. I don’t blame Marner one bit, and neither does Marner.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TheDawnOfANewTage

JimmyApples

Registered User
Sep 24, 2021
3,510
3,634
Matthews deserves heat.

69 goals, can't fight through a stomach bug and has an average game 7 once again
Absolutely.

Every year, Marner takes all the heat and Matthews slides under the radar. Sure, Mitch was bad. But Matthews once again, failed to put the team on his back and take over a series. He’s the highest paid player in the league, 69 regular season goals, and has never scored in a Game 7 with an 0-5 record in them.

No excuses, go out there and f***ing do something.
 

BaconNater

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
5,061
3,667
CO
Did Marner re watch his Game 7 pre game motivational speech that Kyle Dubas gave him before the Montreal series?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad