Big Phil
Registered User
- Nov 2, 2003
- 31,703
- 4,178
Yeah, no weakness, I'm calling it. I never thought Potvin was slow at all. Did he have blinding speed? No. But he could skate. I will agree that his skating if you HAD to pick what was the weakest of his attributes that it would be that.
I think it is really hard to maintain the level that Potvin had in the 1970s so that makes the 1980s not look as good. I will say this, he didn't get a lot of love in the Norris voting in the 1980s. He should have had higher finishes and probably even the Norris in 1981.
His thumb injury he had in 1980 he missed a lot of time and guess what, after the phenomenal seasons Bossy and Trottier (and Potvin too) had in 1979 there was a drop in production by them in 1980 because Potvin missed so much time. No coincidence. He was the "glue".
Put it this way, how good was he in his prime? Well, most will consider him to be ahead of Lidstrom at his best but in general many put Lidstrom ahead of him based on career and aging better. That's how good he was in my opinion. I don't think anyone passes up on a 1979 Potvin over anytime in Lidstrom's career.
I think it is really hard to maintain the level that Potvin had in the 1970s so that makes the 1980s not look as good. I will say this, he didn't get a lot of love in the Norris voting in the 1980s. He should have had higher finishes and probably even the Norris in 1981.
His thumb injury he had in 1980 he missed a lot of time and guess what, after the phenomenal seasons Bossy and Trottier (and Potvin too) had in 1979 there was a drop in production by them in 1980 because Potvin missed so much time. No coincidence. He was the "glue".
Put it this way, how good was he in his prime? Well, most will consider him to be ahead of Lidstrom at his best but in general many put Lidstrom ahead of him based on career and aging better. That's how good he was in my opinion. I don't think anyone passes up on a 1979 Potvin over anytime in Lidstrom's career.