Really, a whining crybaby who plays when he feels like it, notorious for poor character and work habits, a pure one way player who has probably never even met his goalie and thinks a rink doesn't have corners? No, I'll pass on a phil the thrill type thanks. A pure goal scorer who works hard and has solid charater I would take but not one with Kessel like baggage. Pittsburgh is the perfect fit for him.
A one dimensional goal scoring winger, I'd be fine with depending on the cost. Phil Kessel himself and at his current cap hit? No thanks.
I think this idea that EVERY single player on our team needs to be solid defensively is detrimental. Especially if it comes at the cost of offense, we have plenty of great defensive players, if one of the guys on a line is bad at it, it shouldn't matter as much.
Not advocating acquiring Kessel, but getting a one dimensional scorer is fine by me. Hell Frank Vatrano fills that role right now, except he's not scoring that much. (and he costs a fraction of that), but same point. Output costs money. If Vatrano starts putting up numbers, you can bet he'll get a payday, regardless of if his defensive game improves or not. And that's pretty much fact around the league.
One of the Bruins strengths is having great defensive players, they of all teams should be able to afford a one or two one-dimensional guys that are allowed to not worry about their own goalie as much.