FROMSHORETOCHARA
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2009
- 1,820
- 2
Comparing Lucic and Seguin isn't a very valid point at all. Seguin was a young stud who it was pretty damn obvious had lots of room for growth and hadn't yet touched his ceiling. He was also signed at the time of the trade. Lucic is a soon to be UFA expecting to cash in for more than he's worth on a team with cap issues. He also has already hit his peak, and potentially may be on the down swing. I'm not 100% convinced he is declining but it is certainly a possibility. Point is, we're talking about two vastly different scenarios. Trading Lucic for the right deal makes sense. Dealing Seguin was a completely boneheaded move that made no sense at all, even less when you factor in his return. I love Looch but you'd be dumb to not explore moving him.
I keep looch I think he is a rare if not unique player. He had a bad year and that's mostly on him but Krejci injury did him no favor. If they trade looch I guess u need to see the return but I would b very skeptical of any trade where he is best player in deal and we getting pieces back. Looch plus for a star? Maybe it depends on the star. Looch for late first and a decent prospect or two? No way, I'll keep looch.