What jersey numbers do you think are just REAL UGLY numbers? | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

What jersey numbers do you think are just REAL UGLY numbers?

Skinnyjimmy08

WorldTraveler
Mar 30, 2012
22,604
13,383
What numbers do you despise?

I have always hated the number 2... Ive always wondered to myself that players can pretty much pick any number they want and for some reason they roll with #2... so boring

Also #29 and for some reason #61(nothing against Nash) I find hideous haha
 
Any number higher than 39.

Once you hit the 40's they just don't look right, same goes for 50's 60's 70's etc.
 
460252089_slide.jpg


Any of the high numbers that end with 0 are gross too.
 
Last edited:
Pretty much anything in the 20's, 35-39, 53-59 (55 is ok), 85, 87, anything in the 90's ever since 90's birthdays became regular in the league (gross).

The 60's are underrated.
 
Not that I can think of any players who wear these, but I'd imagine 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 being ugly af.
 
Not that I can think of any players who wear these, but I'd imagine 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 being ugly af.

ya #50 is god awful yet Vermette keeps rocking it out

and ya, 60 would be hideous... I think Jason Demers used to wear #60 in San Jose
 
I feel like it's the unequivocal truth that #53 is the worst jersey number known to mankind.

I agree.. I love Horvat, and think he'll be a Linden-style Canuck lifer, but I will not buying his jersey cuz of the number.
It's a great story behind why he wears it... But...


Don't really like any number in the 40's, 50's, or 60's... Except the doubles- 44, 55, 66..
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad