Player Discussion What is the solution to this teams consistency problem?

What should management do to address the consistency issue?


  • Total voters
    54
  • Poll closed .

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,876
7,840
Seems pretty obvious by both every single underlying stat, and my own eyes the direction this team is going.
The goaltending may be costing us games but the team in front of them is playing great hockey most nights.

Ottawa’s already played 20% of their season which is crazy when you think about it. Goalies need to get going fast or luck will start to become part of the playoff picture fairly quickly (injury, hot streaks ie Hamburgler / Karlsson just drags the team into the playoffs, good trade)

on this 4 game homestand if either goalie shows you a sign of life he could get all 4 starts or 3 of 4 starts and if Forsberg becomes the starter all season after this little home stand I dont think Green will flinch to make a move like that.

Greens played the “I love both my goalies” card so well from pre season, if Forsberg becomes the starter there won’t be a goalie controversy because:
1. Nobody in Ottawa will bat an eye because we like Ullmark but I’m not waiting around for him to show up, he has 5 years to find his game he can work on it in practice
2. Green has the license from the fans to make the playoffs under almost any legal conditions, the players can sort their feelings out later
 

Bjornar Moxnes

Registered User
Oct 16, 2016
12,233
4,760
Troms og Finnmark
:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Ok bud. The team is currently tied with the Islanders (by p%) for the last playoff spot. Meanwhile, they've had the 6th best expected goal differential in the league, meaning they'll likely regress to the mean, which means their record should improve. Not only that, but they've had one of the toughest schedules so far this season:
View attachment 932597

Are they making the playoffs for sure? Of course not. Only a few teams get to say that. But this is by far the best chance we've had since the rebuild, and the odds appears to be greater than 50%. Ullmark clearly doesn't need to be Vezina caliber. We just need him to be league average, and we should make the playoffs. If he's Vezina caliber, we're looking at a top 2 finish in the division.

Your little emotional hedge routine is getting old. We get it, you shit on the team so that you win one way or another. Either you're happy because the team does well, or you get to say 'told you so' to everyone. It's a pretty cowardly thing to do.
Heck depending on how things shape up, Ullmark can have a below average season and still we'd finish top 3 in the division.
 

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,846
34,644
already have what?

We were .500 last year in dec. We need to be better
We're currently in the wild card spot by win%, you can't evaluate things in a vacuum because the context is completely different.

Last year, on 19 Nov, the two Wild card spots (by pts%) were Phi (.583%) and Det (.559). TBL were out at .556, and we had .533. That threshold held to the end of the year, when a pts% of .555 held the final wild card spot, and a .500 record had you 5 spots back.

This year, the wild card spots are held by teams at .500. The eastern conference is just more competitive at the moment, so 500 doesn't mean the same thing it meant last year. Idk if it will stay that way, would be pretty crazy if it did, but it's the reality we live in.
 

Sens of Anarchy

Registered User
Jul 9, 2013
67,191
52,935
already have what?

We were .500 last year in dec. We need to be better
For now forget points and % ..
Are we better base on your eye test?

They are by mine.
If we had consistently average goaltending the points would be better,
The underlying numbers are better .. our defensive play is better ... The points should sort themselves out with improved goaltending and if we keep playing the same ... This is an EMO reaction thread
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,666
10,572
Montreal, Canada
It's true that we had a tough schedule so far, plus Pinto, Zub and Perron all missing several games at the same time played a part. But that's the thing, I don't think we have good depth at forward. I like the depth on D if JBD is #6 and Hamonic #7 (although I would have liked Brannstrom still in the mix)

Forward Paces per 82 games :

Elite level : Stutzle 102 Pts, Tkachuk 92 Pts

Star level : Batherson 77 Pts

Top-6 level : Giroux 58 Pts, Norris 58 pts

Secondary scoring level : Gaudette 41 Pts, Pinto 27 Pts, Greig 24 Pts

Role player level : Cousins 20 Pts, Amadio 20 Pts, Gregor 16 Pts, MacEwen 16 Pts

Depth level : Perron/Ostapchuk 7 Pts

Our Top-5 is obviously really good but outside of unexpected Gaudette's production, our scoring depth is severely LACKING. Let's hope that Perron gets going and Pinto/Greig improve their production. Not expecting much from the rest
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PlayOn and DrEasy

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,846
34,644
It's true that we a tough schedule so far, plus Pinto, Zub and Perron all missing several games at the same time played a part. But that's the thing, I don't think we have good depth at forward. I like the depth on D if JBD is #6 and Hamonic #7 (although I would have liked Brannstrom still in the mix)

Forward Paces per 82 games :

Elite level : Stutzle 102 Pts, Tkachuk 92 Pts

Star level : Batherson 77 Pts

Top-6 level : Giroux 58 Pts, Norris 58 pts

Secondary scoring level : Gaudette 41 Pts, Pinto 27 Pts, Greig 24 Pts

Role player level : Cousins 20 Pts, Amadio 20 Pts, Gregor 16 Pts, MacEwen 16 Pts

Depth level : Perron/Ostapchuk 7 Pts

Our Top-5 is obviously really good but outside of unexpected Gaudette's production, our scoring depth is severely LACKING. Let's hope that Perron gets going and Pinto/Greig improve their production. Not expecting much from the rest
The fourth line are all scoring pretty well, you don't typically expect your 11th or 12th forward to score much more than 15-20 pts.

The only guys I'm looking to get more out of are Pinto, and Giroux. Maybe Greig to a lesser degree. I'm not counting Perron since he's a bit of an exceptional circumstance right now.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,666
10,572
Montreal, Canada
The fourth line are all scoring pretty well, you don't typically expect your 11th or 12th forward to score much more than 15-20 pts.

The only guys I'm looking to get more out of are Pinto, and Giroux. Maybe Greig to a lesser degree. I'm not counting Perron since he's a bit of an exceptional circumstance right now.

yeah but Pinto missed 8 games and Perron missed 11 games so guys like Amadio and Gregor got more TOI as a result.

Amadio has averaged 14:29 per game, 12:22 at ES and 1:01 on the PP. That's not 4th liner TOI

Gregor has averaged 13:07 per game, 11:19 at ES. That's also not typical 4th liner minutes

Their TOI must have been higher in games Perron and Pinto didn't play. Cousins, Ostapchuk and MacEwen play 4th line minutes, it's ok I guess
 

PlayOn

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
1,947
2,541
It's true that we had a tough schedule so far, plus Pinto, Zub and Perron all missing several games at the same time played a part. But that's the thing, I don't think we have good depth at forward. I like the depth on D if JBD is #6 and Hamonic #7 (although I would have liked Brannstrom still in the mix)

Forward Paces per 82 games :

Elite level : Stutzle 102 Pts, Tkachuk 92 Pts

Star level : Batherson 77 Pts

Top-6 level : Giroux 58 Pts, Norris 58 pts

Secondary scoring level : Gaudette 41 Pts, Pinto 27 Pts, Greig 24 Pts

Role player level : Cousins 20 Pts, Amadio 20 Pts, Gregor 16 Pts, MacEwen 16 Pts

Depth level : Perron/Ostapchuk 7 Pts

Our Top-5 is obviously really good but outside of unexpected Gaudette's production, our scoring depth is severely LACKING. Let's hope that Perron gets going and Pinto/Greig improve their production. Not expecting much from the rest
I would add I don’t think we are getting enough production from our dmen 5v5 either. Kleven and Hamonic have a point each and Sanderson has only produced on the PP. Our dmen have 3 combined goals this season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrEasy

Micklebot

Moderator
Apr 27, 2010
56,846
34,644
yeah but Pinto missed 8 games and Perron missed 11 games so guys like Amadio and Gregor got more TOI as a result.

Amadio has averaged 14:29 per game, 12:22 at ES and 1:01 on the PP. That's not 4th liner TOI

Gregor has averaged 13:07 per game, 11:19 at ES. That's also not typical 4th liner minutes

Their TOI must have been higher in games Perron and Pinto didn't play. Cousins, Ostapchuk and MacEwen play 4th line minutes, it's ok I guess
Well, the fourth line I was referring to was MacEwen, Gaudette, and Cousins. They've been great.

A third liner should probably give us between 26-44 pts if he plays all 82, that's roughly 193rd to 288th in pts/g last year (40+ games played) among forwards which corresponds to 3rd line expectations. Wrt ES icetime, 193rd is 13:06, and 288th is ~11:33. Not every 3rd liner should be expected to be in that range, some will be above and some below, so Amadio is just above the high end, Gregor is just below the low end

As for them not having typical 4th line linemates, our most common 3rd line this year has actually been Amadio-Ostapchuk-Gregor, though they do have about 18 mins with Ostapchuk replaced by Pinto (which arguably is why Pinto's numbers are lower than expected).

I'm not overly concerned if either comes up a few pts shy of third line expectations, Gregor shouldn't and likely won't be on our third line if everyone is healthy, and Amadio is the 9th forward, so expectations should be on the low end of 3rd liner.
 

Wondercarrot

By The Power of Canadian Tire Centre
Jul 2, 2002
8,376
4,362
Ottawa’s already played 20% of their season which is crazy when you think about it. Goalies need to get going fast or luck will start to become part of the playoff picture fairly quickly (injury, hot streaks ie Hamburgler / Karlsson just drags the team into the playoffs, good trade)

on this 4 game homestand if either goalie shows you a sign of life he could get all 4 starts or 3 of 4 starts and if Forsberg becomes the starter all season after this little home stand I dont think Green will flinch to make a move like that.

Greens played the “I love both my goalies” card so well from pre season, if Forsberg becomes the starter there won’t be a goalie controversy because:
1. Nobody in Ottawa will bat an eye because we like Ullmark but I’m not waiting around for him to show up, he has 5 years to find his game he can work on it in practice
2. Green has the license from the fans to make the playoffs under almost any legal conditions, the players can sort their feelings out later

Yeah I agree with all this, really just making the point that the F and D are doing everything that was asked them/they wanted to do.
I can’t really say I have any complaints this year other than it would be nice for the goalies to play their abilities or at least average. (Which I think they will on the balance. )
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad