You keep more of your paycheque yes, you also spend more of your paycheque on the same basket of luxury goods in a major US city as you do in any Canadian city.We've established you keep more of your paycheck in the 6 markets without state tax. On top of that, there are other draws that make it even more compelling. But yes, no tax teams have an advantage.
Only been to Toronto and Quebec City north of the border. And that was before so many things in the world changed from 2020 onward. I don't recall things being that much cheaper, but at the time CDN was damn near USD. If anything, I thought both were spendy, but granted, stayed at luxury hotels etc.You keep more of your paycheque yes, you also spend more of your paycheque on the same basket of luxury goods in a major US city as you do in any Canadian city.
Curious what Canadian cities you come up and visit? I compare Vancouver (T-1st most expensive Canadian city) with Seattle multiple times per year and every time I end up wondering how it's humanly possible that things have become so expensive in that city and its surroundings. It blows Vancouver out of the water.
I reiterate, from a financial perspective, a pro athlete is not coming out ahead signing in most if not all US markets. The taxes only tell a part of the financial story.
But yes, you are 100% correct, there are other draws. Nobody ever said the weather in your beloved Florida relative to that of Winnipeg was not a major selling point.
1) That doesn’t mean anything, that’s just basic due diligence.Good lord. Sorry but this has been going on for years. I can’t keep going back and finding all the articles.
1.) Lewis gross (Nylanders agent) firm went on 32 thoughts and said they give their players a spreadsheet and it shows them the taxes and take home salary in. Each jurisdiction
2.) this year Tampa GM literally said he uses tax advantages
3.) radulov said he signed in Dallas vs
Montreal due to tax rate
3.) Marc Méthot said he took home 700k more a year on a 4.9 salary moving from Ottawa to Dallas. Jeff Petrys agent even said there was a difference in Montreal vs Edmonton
4.) low tax market ufas sign for 11-12%
Of the cap vs comparable players in comparable markets (weather/winning) vs high tax which generally are 13.5-14.5
There was an athletic article where an NHL accountant walked through scenarios (Canadian playing in Canada/us, eurpean and American).
This year all of the top free agents signed in state tax free states. Guentzel. Reinhart. Montour. stamkos. Marchy. Skej. Stephenson.
There are tons of examples. If you google for 10 minutes. You will find them.
Tell me you've never paid taxes in your life without telling me you've never paid taxes in your life.It’s becoming a big problem that the NHL has to be worried about. The NHL’s smallest TV markets are able to spend in some cases 15%+ more than large market teams.
Take Panthers vs Rangers for example.
Between NY state tax and NY city tax, the rangers roster for the same exact salary takes home about 15% less than floridas roster.
1) will the nhl allow a “tax allowance” to make everyone have the same net effective ceiling?
2) is it politically palatable for states and cities like ny/nyc to exempt athletes from state and city income tax? IMO it’d be deeply popular from constituents to do so.
Maybe they could just not vote for ridiculous taxes? Seems like an easy thing to fix, don't like higher taxes don't vote for them. No reason to exempt the people who should be taxed the most because they play a game for a living.It’s becoming a big problem that the NHL has to be worried about. The NHL’s smallest TV markets are able to spend in some cases 15%+ more than large market teams.
Take Panthers vs Rangers for example.
Between NY state tax and NY city tax, the rangers roster for the same exact salary takes home about 15% less than floridas roster.
1) will the nhl allow a “tax allowance” to make everyone have the same net effective ceiling?
2) is it politically palatable for states and cities like ny/nyc to exempt athletes from state and city income tax? IMO it’d be deeply popular from constituents to do so.