What if the Habs are still in a playoff spot at the TDL ?

George Lebay

Registered User
Feb 17, 2012
774
933
Laval
I'm not expecting this to happen but I wasn't expecting what we are witnessing right now. So anyway.. Do you guys think our GM could change the plan a bit and try to get some assets to help our team be more competitive and increase its chance to clinch a playoff spot ?
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,801
27,851
East Coast
I'm not expecting this to happen but I wasn't expecting what we are witnessing right now. So anyway.. Do you guys think our GM could change the plan a bit and try to get some assets to help our team be more competitive and increase its chance to clinch a playoff spot ?

NO! Stay the course even if they are close to a playoff spot. Don't care if we trade 5th rounders or B- type prospects but we can't be trading anything more valuable than that.

If Monahan keeps this up, he should not be re-signed. Flip him to a contender for pick (1st or two 2nd's) and if he likes Montreal that much, we can see if he wants to sign in the off season.
 

L4br3cqu3

Matter of principle.
Sponsor
May 5, 2002
7,042
4,369
La Tuque
I just hope we simply 'stay the course', team is actually way better than I expected so far, and they're fun to watch to boot (been a couple years I didn't sit in front of an entire game), but I still think he will try to shed useless players like Drouin and Dadonov for whatever, they won't be re-signed anyway.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,420
16,807
I assume you mean March for TDL (March 3rd), more than April.

That's actually intriguing. I have no idea. My biggest question mark is honestly about goaltenders.

First, the obvious - if team is doing fantastic/is on its way to qualifying for playoffs - well, ok. You can't "tank" anymore, even if fans here would have wanted to. Even selling off assets, you won't go from playoffs to bottom of standings in a month. Maybe you still trade 1 or 2 guys away for really good return, but it becomes less about maximizing draft position, that ship would have sailed.

So - looking towards a playoff run - do you go into playoffs with Allen/Montambault? Obviously you gotta factor in the fact that they'd probably be having a good season to even have the team close to playoffs - but to me it's still a duo you can't win with in playoffs. I wonder if Hughes does something for goalies. Obvious options are:

1. Carey Price returns. I think Carey Price can play hockey today - he just can't sustain it over a full season. If the Finals started tomorrow, he'd play. So - if team is doing really good, could he train and practice and prep for a return towards season end to support the team in playoffs? I can legitimately see that happening. I'd say 50% chance

2. If Price isn't possible, Hughes trades for a goalie. I know goalie market is always hit and miss, and good goalies in particular are few and far between - but I could see him making a play for someone better than Allen

3. We do nothing with goalies, and almost certainly lose round 1.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,420
16,807
I think they are sellers no matter what. Stick to the plan.
If I can get assets, I'm moving anybody not named Suzuki, Caufield, Dach, Slafkovsky, Guhle, Harris, Xhekaj, Barron + prospects.

It depends a little bit on context though.

Are they in ~9th or 10th spot in the east, 1 or 2 points out of WC2 with 1 game in hand? Or are they 2nd in division, 9 points above 9th place in conference and more "safely" in playoffs?

If it's closer to scenario 2 - you can still sell off 1 or 2 asset maybe, but you can't go all out selling a tons of players off. There comes a point where if the team is having a great season - well, you hold the course and look towards playoffs. Doesn't mean you have to sacrifice future and buy rentals or anything - but if you trade away a bunch of key contributors to season's success, and then the team falls from 2nd in division to....9th and just misses playoffs, that'd be pretty dumb.

But yes - if they're just a "bubble team", in the race for playoffs amongst many others - I would agree they still sell assets.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,801
27,851
East Coast
If Hughes and Gorton want fans and media to turn on them in a heartbeat... one way to do that is to be buyers cause the Habs are better this season.
 

Habs 4 Life

No Excuses
Mar 30, 2005
41,229
5,113
Montreal
Absolutely not. Get rid of the players that are going to be UFA if any offers are made and if the young kids make the playoffs well great experience for them. If they miss out, it was expected. You can't change the process here, lots of teams have done it and have regretted it even more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bsl and BLONG7

Steve Shutt

Don't Poke the Bear
May 31, 2007
1,806
1,088
You 'stay the course' and move expiring contracts for assets that help win long term. Grab picks and prospects for Drouin, Dadonov, Byron, Monahan and give their ice time to Pezzetta, Ylonen, Slaf, Pitlick, and Pinard.
 

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,858
23,533
Nova Scotia
Visit site
NO! Stay the course even if they are close to a playoff spot. Don't care if we trade 5th rounders or B- type prospects but we can't be trading anything more valuable than that.

If Monahan keeps this up, he should not be re-signed. Flip him to a contender for pick (1st or two 2nd's) and if he likes Montreal that much, we can see if he wants to sign in the off season.
Couldn't agree more.....................
I also think we will slip a little as the season wears on....
We will not be picking top 5 next season though, more like top 10 unless we have some crazy lottery luck.
It would seem the development of some of these kids, and we have to give MSL alot of credit, has pushed this rebuild/reset along quicker.
But we should stay the course, and if we are a bubble team no way do we make a splash and add something.....and jepordize the near future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs Halifax

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,801
27,851
East Coast
Couldn't agree more.....................
I also think we will slip a little as the season wears on....
We will not be picking top 5 next season though, more like top 10 unless we have some crazy lottery luck.
It would seem the development of some of these kids, and we have to give MSL alot of credit, has pushed this rebuild/reset along quicker.
But we should stay the course, and if we are a bubble team no way do we make a splash and add something.....and jepordize the near future.

The way I see it is we likely are not trading any valuable futures. Hughes has worked too hard to accumulate more picks up to this point.

The issue here is not selling on guys like Monahan and others cause they want to remain a playoff team. Not like we will jeopardize the future but we will not take advantage of more higher draft power.

The more darts to throw at the board, the better!

You 'stay the course' and move expiring contracts for assets that help win long term. Grab picks and prospects for Drouin, Dadonov, Byron, Monahan and give their ice time to Pezzetta, Ylonen, Slaf, Pitlick, and Pinard.

Drouin, Dadanov, Byron might stay cause they might be no takers.

Hoffman may return a 2nd or 3rd rounder if he has a good season.

Monahan as a center and having a good season might return a 1st or two 2nd's.

Hard to say on Anderson and Dvorak.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

Habs 4 Life

No Excuses
Mar 30, 2005
41,229
5,113
Montreal
The way I see it is we likely are not trading any valuable futures. Hughes has worked too hard to accumulate more picks up to this point.

The issue here is not selling on guys like Monahan and others cause they want to remain a playoff team. Not like we will jeopardize the future but we will not take advantage of more higher draft power.

The more darts to throw at the board, the better!



Drouin, Dadanov, Byron might stay cause they might be no takers.

Hoffman may return a 2nd or 3rd rounder if he has a good season.

Monahan as a center and having a good season might return a 1st or two 2nd's.

Hard to say on Anderson and Dvorak.
I'm ok with the Habs keeping Monahan if the plan is to keep him around going forward and plan to trade Dvorak instead since he has more value. But it's got to be a cheap contract with Monahan, nothing more than 4 years and this is assuming he remains healthy all season.
 

HabSgt

Go Habs D'OH
Oct 19, 2019
11,531
18,097
Montreal
1668525594874.png
 

BLONG7

Registered User
Oct 30, 2002
36,858
23,533
Nova Scotia
Visit site
Jeff Gordon answered that question last night on Mariano - his response was that he's building a team that can consistently win in the long term and not a team that wins short term. Sounds to me like he'll stay the course
Love to hear this..............They have said this ALL along.................using words like sustainable.
This Gorton guy, is a beauty. ( To steal a quote from Grapes )
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,801
27,851
East Coast
I'm ok with the Habs keeping Monahan if the plan is to keep him around going forward and plan to trade Dvorak instead since he has more value. But it's got to be a cheap contract with Monahan, nothing more than 4 years and this is assuming he remains healthy all season.

I'd be content with that but hard to know as fans in terms of what will be offered for both Monahan and Dvorak at the deadline.

It comes down to what is offered. If the offers are the same for both Monahan and Dvorak and Monahan wanted to sign a team friendly deal, it would be a good move to trade Dvorak and keep Monahan yes. I'd go with 2 years for Monahan. 4 is too much for me. 3 would be OK.

Love to hear this..............They have said this ALL along.................using words like sustainable.
This Gorton guy, is a beauty. ( To steal a quote from Grapes )

Gorton and Hughes know very well what mistakes Bergevin made. I think they steer clear of making the same long term flaws type moves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BLONG7

GrandBison

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
2,082
2,439
I think they would stick with the kids if that's the case... And that would be a great experience for them. But if a guy like Monahan is a great contributor to the success, they won't send him away at the tdl.
 

Next Best Thing

Registered User
Oct 31, 2022
160
149
I think they would stick with the kids if that's the case... And that would be a great experience for them. But if a guy like Monahan is a great contributor to the success, they won't send him away at the tdl.

Yep and not only that but I can even see him growing into a mentorship role for the young guns, he's got a good attitude you want around your team. The question is really is he going to be good enough to contribute tangibly to a contender in the future and I think so.
 

Gamimenos

Registered User
Apr 28, 2009
3,221
1,304
To me this would just indicate that the rebuild is going better than expected. No need to compromise this. Keep on with the rebuild and accept any and all successes along the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bsl

Habs 4 Life

No Excuses
Mar 30, 2005
41,229
5,113
Montreal
I'd be content with that but hard to know as fans in terms of what will be offered for both Monahan and Dvorak at the deadline.

It comes down to what is offered. If the offers are the same for both Monahan and Dvorak and Monahan wanted to sign a team friendly deal, it would be a good move to trade Dvorak and keep Monahan yes. I'd go with 2 years for Monahan. 4 is too much for me. 3 would be OK.



Gorton and Hughes know very well what mistakes Bergevin made. I think they steer clear of making the same long term flaws type moves.
I doubt if Monahan stays healthy he would sign anything under 4 years, maybe 3 but I think 2 we could forget about it. If nothing good is offered for Monahan, we have the option of keeping him until the off season, negotiate and see what else is out there to move Dvorak. No rush or stress to trade Dvorak at the deadline unless a team comes with an offer that can't be refused. I feel for a change the Habs are in power here even though we would be sellers
 

the valiant effort

settle down, bud
Apr 17, 2017
4,793
5,823
The thread title is an especially funny question considering the Habs are not actually in a playoff spot at the moment.
 

Habs Halifax

Loyal Habs Fan
Jul 11, 2016
70,801
27,851
East Coast
I doubt if Monahan stays healthy he would sign anything under 4 years, maybe 3 but I think 2 we could forget about it. If nothing good is offered for Monahan, we have the option of keeping him until the off season, negotiate and see what else is out there to move Dvorak. No rush or stress to trade Dvorak at the deadline unless a team comes with an offer that can't be refused. I feel for a change the Habs are in power here even though we would be sellers

That would be Monahan's decision to make. No way I fall into the 4 year term trap. 3 maybe but 2 would be ideal. I'd go 2 and pay him what he wants (within reason). We have a lot of cap space in the next two seasons but then it gets tricky with others who exit the ELC's.

The thread title is an especially funny question considering the Habs are not actually in a playoff spot at the moment.

Their winning % is tied 12th in the NHL at the moment. Are you really going to nit pick the 5 way tie at 17 points? That would be funny ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs 4 Life

xX SEYF Xx

Registered User
Apr 5, 2022
2,081
5,126
Montreal
You see, in this world there's 5 kinds of people my friend :

1- Sell if you can, whatever the ranking: Monahan, Drouin, Dadonov, Hoffman, Armia, Gallagher, Byron, Price​
2- Sell if you have a good offer and we out of the playoffs: Anderson, Dvorak​
3- Keep for now unless an offer you cant refuse: Edmundson, Savard, Matheson, Evans, Allen, Montembeault​
4- Whatever: Wideman, Kovacevic, Pezzetta​
5- Keep even if an asteroid hits the earth: Suzuki, Caufield, Dach, Slafkovsky, Guhle, Harris, Xhekaj​

1668527504321.png
 
Last edited:

Ad

Ad

Ad