Big Phil
Registered User
- Nov 2, 2003
- 31,703
- 4,152
What would have happened if Montreal had lost to Philadelphia in the '76 Cup final? At that time the Flyers had won two straight Cups and had 118 points that year. Montreal had 127 points and was the only team statistically better than Philly. The Flyers had "pounded" the Russians earlier in the year while the Canadiens only tied them 3-3.
Hockey's future was on the line more than anything else. Philly was a good team I'll admit but secretly the NHL wanted to have finesse win over brut intimidation. Not only did Montreal win but they swept them 4-0. What if Philly had swept them? Would the league of been the same for the rest of the 70s? And 80s? Would a lot of teams had gone to the thuggery style?
Lets face it Montreal had some tough guys then too. Robinson and Savard were no pushovers, or Bouchard. Robinson more than anyone tamed the Broad Street Bullies. But they won built on finesse and speed. Lafleur, Cournoyer etc. But if Schultz, Dupont and etc. bullied the Canadiens to defeat would there have been the High flying 80s? How different would hockey have been?
Hockey's future was on the line more than anything else. Philly was a good team I'll admit but secretly the NHL wanted to have finesse win over brut intimidation. Not only did Montreal win but they swept them 4-0. What if Philly had swept them? Would the league of been the same for the rest of the 70s? And 80s? Would a lot of teams had gone to the thuggery style?
Lets face it Montreal had some tough guys then too. Robinson and Savard were no pushovers, or Bouchard. Robinson more than anyone tamed the Broad Street Bullies. But they won built on finesse and speed. Lafleur, Cournoyer etc. But if Schultz, Dupont and etc. bullied the Canadiens to defeat would there have been the High flying 80s? How different would hockey have been?