I understand that not all giveaways are treated equally. That said, the game doesn't even go to OT if Sandin makes 2 very rudimentary plays. The margin of victory in the playoffs is very slim. Those are 2 avoidable mistakes that cost us the game IMO.Ok, but with all due respect the Galychenuck turnover was beyond belief. Which Dermott, Marner, Sandin, Thornton giveaway resulted in a 2 on 0 overtime winner?
I understand that not all giveaways are treated equally. That said, the game doesn't even go to OT if Sandin makes 2 very rudimentary plays. The margin of victory in the playoffs is very slim. Those are 2 avoidable mistakes that cost us the game IMO.
Mistakes are part of the game. Sandin is not immune from them, neither is Gally. To me, all 3 of those goals were massively avoidable and should be treated equally. Regardless of the in game circumstances.
Just because it was OT does not mean that the mistake free hockey began then. It should be that mistake free mindset from the opening puck drop in playoffs IMO. The playoffs are won and lost by these little mistakes.
Gally's giveaway was truly inexcusable. But I really feel the same way about the 2 mistakes Sandin made as well.
Injury was the reason he was not playing the majority of the year. Not coaches decision. He was out for 2 months with a broken foot.they should have played sandin more during the regular season so he’d be more prepared for playoffs.
Injury was the reason he was not playing the majority of the year. Not coaches decision. He was out for 2 months with a broken foot.
View attachment 463972
But ya maybe there was a handful of HS's in there where he could have potentially checked in. But it would not have been many. And to be honest, I am not sure it would have been a huge difference maker getting an extra game or 2 in the regular season if in fact he was HS'd. He was largely outstanding in his 14 GP this year. Unfortunately for him that game 5 was an awful representation of his abilities. It's going to happen with a young player who plays the way he does. He will learn, and he will be better for it. But the only way to avoid those Sandin errors from a coaching perspective was to either not dress him (which they did in game 6), or bench him after his giveaway's (which they also did).
Everyone deserves some of the blame for this collapse, including the coaching staff. But at the end of the day, Sandin knows his mistakes cost his team a chance at winning in regulation, and Gally knows he cost his team the chance to win in OT. We can blame all the surrounding parts all we want, but the players themselves would never do that. They know they need to be better.
Honestly I think his game is not that far off where it needs to be to be a consistent NHL defensemen. I don't know if he will ever become a premier defender when the puck is not on his tape. I think he will grow to a point where he can hold his own in his own end, similar to Mo, but he likely will get burnt from time to time. Which is fairly common for most offensive defensemen. He makes enough plays with the puck on his blade that actually limits the amount of time he actually defends. His ability to go back on pucks and make high end plays to mitigate the oncoming forecheck is exceptional IMO. It clearly was not on display in game 5, but usually his zone exits are very clean and appear effortless. To me, that stuff will only get better as he figures out the stuff he can and can't get away with at the NHL level. But I really don't know how you can play the way he does without giving up a little in return. I think for him, it will be about recognizing when you have it and when you don't. Game 5 being a perfect example. The time and space was not there. It was in prior games, but not in game 5. He needed to adjust the way he played. He didn't. By him not adjusting, it took his biggest strength (puck carrying) and made it his biggest weakness.I agree. I definitely wasn’t absolving sandin of his mistakes. I’m just saying it somewhat comes with the territory when you lack experience. I still think sandin has a lot of growing to do defensively.
Keefe deserves equal blame for the Sandin debacle. It was supposed to be a gotcha with Sandin on PP1 and it blew up in his face. Rookie mistakes.I understand that not all giveaways are treated equally. That said, the game doesn't even go to OT if Sandin makes 2 very rudimentary plays. The margin of victory in the playoffs is very slim. Those are 2 avoidable mistakes that cost us the game IMO.
Mistakes are part of the game. Sandin is not immune from them, neither is Gally. To me, all 3 of those goals were massively avoidable and should be treated equally. Regardless of the in game circumstances.
Just because it was OT does not mean that the mistake free hockey began then. It should be that mistake free mindset from the opening puck drop in playoffs IMO. The playoffs are won and lost by these little mistakes.
Gally's giveaway was truly inexcusable. But I really feel the same way about the 2 mistakes Sandin made as well.
It is tough. It's not a black and white thing when it comes to coaching young players. Sandin was great in the prior 4 playoff games that he played. He helped win game 2 which was massive, and he really did make our PP look a lot better IMO. The puck just didn't go in for us, what else is new.Keefe deserves equal blame for the Sandin debacle. It was supposed to be a gotcha with Sandin on PP1 and it blew up in his face. Rookie mistakes.
Marner had 1 that cost us the game as well.Gally had 1. Sandin had like 4.
Yep a rook coach put in a rook defender who he knew lacked NHL foot speed .. hired by a rook GM who was hired by a rook president .. bottom line too many ROOKS involved with Leafs .. da result was rook results on ice when it matters .. only bright side is lots of learning and development in Leafland .. on da job learning though at expense of season ticket holders and sponsorsKeefe deserves equal blame for the Sandin debacle. It was supposed to be a gotcha with Sandin on PP1 and it blew up in his face. Rookie mistakes.
I like Sandin, our coach and the GM but I completely agree that they should have come back with the game 4 lineupYep a rook coach put in a rook defender who he knew lacked NHL foot speed .. hired by a rook GM who was hired by a rook president .. bottom line too many ROOKS involved with Leafs .. da result was rook results on ice when it matters .. only bright side is lots of learning and development in Leafland .. on da job learning though at expense of season ticket holders and sponsors
They will all learn over time for sure but it is cumulative results of ROOKs ..I like Sandin, our coach and the GM but I completely agree that they should have come back with the game 4 lineup
any giveaway that results in an OT goal is bad ...one thing you can control is blind giveaways, especially when you are the last man back; just dont do it!The Dermott giveaway in game 6 was arguably worse. If I recall correctly, we were dominanting that OT period and outshooting them by a large margin.
He may have great analytics .. but what he lacks is NHL straight away foot speed .. this has been an issue which is very well known to Marlies and Leaf skating coaches and coaches .. it is due to short stride length not power .. Sandin is very strong on his skates with tremendous core strengthCertain people on this board used Analytics to explain why Sandin was an elite defenseman.
What gives?
![]()
Leafs still would have found a way to choke somehow. That's just how the team culture is going to remain until they are no longer paying players 11M per season to flip more pucks over the glass the in playoffs than goals scored.
Championship caliber teams find a way to win, while this one finds ways to lose.