SaltyElkHunter
I …. am…. The LA Kings!
I was always a huge fan and love the entire catalog. Super bummed when Chester Joined the frat of Cornell, Weiland, Lane, and Cobain.
Have you smiled this century?Dated schlock for burnouts and JNCO wearers from one of the worst periods in American music, that also just hired a scientologist (cult of rich freaks and abusers) so they could go on a cash grab nostalgia tour
My hot take, these new songs sound more like Chester's side project Dead by Sunrise than LP songs... that isn't a bad thing because DbS was a really solid group.
That’s my feelings on it as well. Wish they would have just went with a new name. Retired the LP Jersey and moved forward.I think that's kind of my take. Love their new work and the replacement members but I personally just have to separate it from classic Linkin Park. It's like trying to replace Bob Miller; sure you can find a terrific artist to try to fill big shoes and it's a respectable effort but you can't replace a legend. I have to just treat it like a new, great band on its own merits.
I mean "Hybrid Theory" was right there as both a reference to the original band name and their big album.That’s my feelings on it as well. Wish they would have just went with a new name. Retired the LP Jersey and moved forward.
Not talking about any albums. When the lead singer goes just start a new band and call it that. lolI mean "Hybrid Theory" was right there as both a reference to the original band name and their big album.
Sorry I mean Hybrid Theory was the bands name before Chester joined the group.Not talking about any albums. When the lead singer does just start a new band and call it that. lol
I kind of leave that up to the band, who know the singer better than any of us. They would know better about how to uphold the legacy. But I'd also feel that way if the band lost it's bassist, lead guitarist, etc.Not talking about any albums. When the lead singer goes just start a new band and call it that. lol
I mean they can do whatever they want it’s their product of course. I just can’t think of many instances where the replacement is better or as good as the original. Still phenomenal vocalist (usually) but the vibe 100% changes. It’s not a good or bad thing just an inherent truth.I kind of leave that up to the band, who know the singer better than any of us. They would know better about how to uphold the legacy. But I'd also feel that way if the band lost it's bassist, lead guitarist, etc.
I see your point and I think part of it was they came along at exactly the right time. They came up when the big style at the time was crunchy, ultra loud chug, chug guitar noise and screaming, yelling vocals.I have mixed feelings on LP.
I know when someone says they really like a band, then another person comes along and says that band sucks, it's kind of insulting. So that's not my intention, but honestly LP isn't very good.
The basic bitch instrumentation (especially the drums) has always made their music kind of boring IMO.
Mike Shinoda is a pretty terrible and cringe rapper. Every time it's "his turn" he ruins the song.
BUT, they do have a lot of catchy choruses (I've always liked the chorus on Points of Authority). Mainly because of Chester's vocals. So I understand the appeal. I also miss the days when rock bands were big. People like to shit on nu-Metal, but I have fond memories of those days. Rock was exciting back then.
From what I've heard of the new vocalist she sounds pretty good. She has those sandpaper vocals just like Chester did.
Definitely came along at the right time. Commercial success in art is all about timing.I see your point and I think part of it was they came along at exactly the right time. They came up when the big style at the time was crunchy, ultra loud chug, chug guitar noise and screaming, yelling vocals.
Here was this band doing hard rock songs with clean vocals, lots of samples, and fairly crisp guitar sounds. LP was kind of unlike anything else commercially around at that time.
Compare them to the other big names in similar genres say Korn, Limp Bisquit, Deftones, Tool.
Linkin Park was really just a band with a sound for mainstream success at the right time, right place, with the right sound.
Agree on all this. Incubus blew my mind the first time I heard the album SCIENCE! Make Yourself is also a great album, but just slightly behind that first release for me. It was very much an album that opened my mind to what music could sound like and be at a time when I needed it.Out of the late 1990's / early 2000's big bands of that type, I think Slipknot's first album holds up the best. Korn is strange. Their best stuff is cool and unique, but they also had a lot of bad cringy stuff. The entirety of the Deftones' catalog probably holds up the best, and they're still popular with young people to this day. I felt Incubus was very unique when they hit the scene and had very good musicianship. Always enjoyed Make Yourself (1999). All these bands are way more talented than LP.
And come on man, you gotta spell "Bizkit" right!