What’s up with Byfield?

SettlementRichie10

Registered User
May 6, 2012
10,210
8,429
EaUT4mlXgAAEf_W.jpg

Yeah wtf was that lol. Just come out and say it.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,320
16,510
The problem is, people say he is horrible or a "bust" because of where he was drafted. And then someone comes in, as bland did in this thread and say he is well rounded and "playing fine", and while I hate the word "bust" and think it's unfair, the word disappointment is not unfair. But again, people have a hard time differentiating those words, especially Kings fans, because I've been accused of calling him a bust, when I think he's just a disappointment.

Byfield will be a fine secondary piece on an NHL team, he's not a bad player, but he was the #2 overall pick in the draft, and that makes him a disappointing pick. When you are picking that high, anything less than a good 1st line player or 1st pairing defender is disappointing.
This sums it up well.

Never once called him a bad player or prospect, will probably still be a good 2nd line player.

It was the post saying he should have gone 1st overall, or that he had “unlimited potential” that were always wrong.
 

Herby

How could Blake have known?
Feb 27, 2002
26,809
17,044
Great Lakes Area
Why are people getting angry at the "better athlete than hockey player" comment? This description has been used for plenty of prospects before, including players like Jack Johnson, Adam Fantilli, Pierre-Luc Dubois and Matt Boldy. Having watched the vast majority of Byfield's NHL career, I think it is actually a fair and valid description of his playing style and one of the reasons he has struggled at center compared to playing on the wing. He relies more on his physical tools than on hockey sense. Plenty of players have had long NHL careers with a similar style, while others, who aren't great athletes or physical specimens, have had long careers with a game-sense-based approach.

People should be able to have this opinion of a player without slanderous replies implying they are a racist.

Kopitar carried his ass last year and made Byfield look a lot better than he really is.

This is hyperbole, he did not "carry his ass" last year. I love Kopitar and think he's the most underrated player of the 21st century, but at 37 he is not carrying Byfield or anyone else, even in his prime Kopitar did not make his linemates into automatic 55 point players. Byfield contributed pretty solidly to that line last year, there are plenty of 2nd line players like Byfield that play on their teams 1st line.
 
Last edited:

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,516
66,618
I.E.
This is hyperbole, he did not "carry his ass" last year. I love Kopitar and think he's the most underrated player of the 21st century, but at 37 he is not carrying Byfield or anyone else, even in his prime Kopitar did not make his linemates into automatic 55 point players. Byfield contributed pretty solidly to that line last year, there are plenty of 2nd line players like Byfield that played on their teams 1st line.

The thing about Kopitar is people see 'numbers up' and assume 'better play' but really he's not remotely the player he used to be... the reason he's scoring more now is 1. he's finally released from his 200-foot all the time responsibility and #1 PK job, he's rarely touching the puck these days, much less carrying it end to end and 2. It's simply a higher scoring era. His minutes are down and he's an elite player with elite IQ and great hands but hes absolutely not carrying play.

He was hitting the wall hard last year until Byfield got next to him. AT WORST it was a perfect symbiotic relationship.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,516
66,618
I.E.
Care to elaborate as to why he’s producing about as well as the LA legend PLD produced last season?

Or just going to continue contributing nothing?

You were given reasonable good explanations earlier in the thread including stats and from people other than me that will be nicer to you

But you don’t want that, you just want to circlejerk negativity as you have since his very first draft thread, that’s why you’re getting friction in response.

You can’t pretend you’re just genuinely curious when you don’t respond to the thought out posts with reasons and just like the ones going “lol carried by Kopitar”
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
22,320
16,510
he’s not D+6
That’s some tough math
This has already been pointed out.

It’s his D+5… which really isn’t some kind of great argument when you’re a 30pt player as a 2nd overall pick…

You were given reasonable good explanations earlier in the thread including stats and from people other than me that will be nicer to you

But you don’t want that, you just want to circlejerk negativity as you have since his very first draft thread, that’s why you’re getting friction in response.

You can’t pretend you’re just genuinely curious when you don’t respond to the thought out posts with reasons and just like the ones going “lol carried by Kopitar”
So he has a sore wrist and is playing C?

Some weak arguments for a guy who’s supposed to be a 1st line C?
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,516
66,618
I.E.
This has already been pointed out.

It’s his D+5… which really isn’t some kind of great argument when you’re a 30pt player as a 2nd overall pick…


So he has a sore wrist and is playing C?

Some weak arguments for a guy who’s supposed to be a 1st line C?

Case in point with zero effort :laugh:
 

Osprey

Registered User
Feb 18, 2005
27,940
10,833
He was hitting the wall hard last year until Byfield got next to him.
I'm not sure what you mean because he and Byfield were paired on opening night and played together until mid January. In their last 9 games together for a while, here's how they looked:

qbaz.png


That 0.59 GF/60 was a massive drop-off from their previous 3.04 GF/60 and their season averages. It was Kopitar's worst stretch of the season and it came with Byfield, not without him. If Byfield was carrying that line, that would suggest that it was he who hit the wall hard. At worst, they both hit it together.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,516
66,618
I.E.
I'm not sure what you mean because he and Byfield were paired on opening night and played together until mid January. In their last 9 games together for a while, here's how they looked:

View attachment 938945

That 0.59 GF/60 was a massive drop-off from their previous 3.04 GF/60 and their season averages. It was Kopitar's worst stretch of the season and it came with Byfield, not without him. If Byfield was carrying that line, that would suggest that it was he who hit the wall hard. At worst, they both hit it together.

This is what I mean by Kopitar was hitting a wall without him.

Using your arbitrary dates, here's the before Jan 1st:

1733182992136.png


And after:

1733183122573.png


I think it's a stretch to suggest Byfield was the catalyst in Kopitar gassing out.

I mean that's a whole different conversation altogether...but Byfield was the driver.

Look I know your whole thesis is Byfield is simply a complementary winger. I doubt I'm going to change anyone's mind who already has it made up that that's all he is, or he's a bust, or this is the best he will be. The best I can do is show you the premises are bunk and this is why I'm reaching a different conclusion.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad