They were fine against the Preds, apart from their usual first period swoon IIRC.When was the last time that the Avs played a good game? Is it against NJ?
They were fine against the Preds, apart from their usual first period swoon IIRC.When was the last time that the Avs played a good game? Is it against NJ?
I didn't think they were fine, especially not for playing against a struggling team that is sitting at 31 overall.They were fine against the Preds, apart from their usual first period swoon IIRC.
This line of thinking can be used to discredit any good team. The Avs were genuinely good in that game.I didn't think they were fine, especially not for playing against a struggling team that is sitting at 31 overall.
I'd even say that in the NJ game it was more about the Devils being bad than the Avs being good.
Even at their best the Avs are playing like a wildcard team. That's scary.
They were fine against the Preds, apart from their usual first period swoon IIRC.
Blackwood stole that gameThey were fine against the Preds, apart from their usual first period swoon IIRC.
I don't think the team has really been "the team" yet. They started the season much farther from their final form than any other Avs group in recent memory.IMO the last good and complete game the Avs played was against Vegas at the end of November. Prior to that would have been the Caps game a few before. There have not been many games where I'd say the Avs have been great. Which isn't the end of the world if you can find ways to win. There just hasn't been much dominance unless a team craps the bed in net (which also tends to happen a lot in the NHL lately).
Sure there has been a bumpy start with injuries, absences, goaltending, etc. That's also not anything really new either. The Avs are consistently one of the top 5 most injured teams, PAP leaves have happened with shocking regularity, and the situation in net hasn't been stable since Varly (and was it even then?). This team is just off, and IMO a lot of it has to do with the pieces not fitting the system and the depth just not being that good. As an example, I think Ivan is a great story and I've liked him prior to him being a part of the org... but he really doesn't fit the progression of normally entering the NHL. We're filled with depth castoffs who nobody really wanted and we are relying on them... Kelly, Kiviranta, Wagner.I don't think the team has really been "the team" yet. They started the season much farther from their final form than any other Avs group in recent memory.
I mean, it's not even new years and we traded out our two top goalies in the entire system. We were missing half our top six wingers for a month or so and then had RosCo and JD go down. Manson's down. We brought in Brannstrom, CDH, and Ludvig but to be honest, I'd almost rather have Middleton paired with Malinski once Manson's back.
With Wags on waiver, does that mean we're getting two callups? I doubt JD is coming back, he didn't travel with the team..
I think the Avs are missing Landy more than we thought they would. Need the captain to pull the team together when things aren’t going right. We see time after time when things are going wrong, Nate doesn’t really provide leadership. He gets frustrated, yells at the refs or argues with Bednar etc…
Makar is somewhat a leader but he seems like a quiet type who doesn’t really say much. We need Landy on the ice. He can be around the teammates in the locker room and stuff, but it’s not the same as him being on the ice. I was so wrong when few years ago I was saying that Nate should be the captain instead of Landy.
Are you telling me that Nuke is not a good leader?Not just Landy, but we’ve lost invaluable leaders like EJ and Cogliano as well.
We haven’t replaced any of those 3 in the leadership department.
The depth will improve when we get Drouin, Wood and hopefully Landy back, and Manson on D. This season started out shitty for the Avs. All the injuries and bad goaltending didn’t allow for a good start to the season. We had a very favorable schedule in October.Landy has been missing for 3 years, I sure hope he's not the reason why they play like that.
What we're seeing is the lack of depth and it's only going to get worse.
That schedule wasn't nearly as easy as it was made to sound. The 'bad' teams in there were not nearly as bad as previous years.. IE instead of the Sharks not even being a .300 team, they are more of a .410 team. Then the Seattle/Utah/Isles/Ottawa group.. instead of being ~.400 teams they are pushing .500 and in some cases pushing up to the playoffs. The whole weakness was always a myth. It wasn't an overly strong schedule to start, but it wasn't overly weak either.The depth will improve when we get Drouin, Wood and hopefully Landy back, and Manson on D. This season started out shitty for the Avs. All the injuries and bad goaltending didn’t allow for a good start to the season. We had a very favorable schedule in October.
It was a type of schedule where the Avs could have put themselves in good position in the central, but instead struggled with injuries and bad goaltending. Now we have to play catch up probably rest of the season just to make the playoffs. I said it before, but I think this is not our season, even if we make the playoffs, probably not going too far unless we finally get healthy and get Landy back, and most importantly stay heallthy, then we’ll have a chance with improved goaltending
1. Cale doesn't need anything added to his plate.Landy has been missing for 3 years, I sure hope he's not the reason why they play like that.
What we're seeing is the lack of depth and it's only going to get worse.
I've often wondered about just how important these roles truly are in professional sports and just how much of it has been romanticized by jouralists throughout the years. For all of Landy's wonderful abilities, it was Cogliano who gave the speech that made the difference. That's not a knock on Landy by any means at all, but rather just showing that it doesn't have to be a C that does the leadership. For all the crap that we have rightfully given RyJo... what he did for Josh Manson is the absolute epitomy of leadership.I think the lack of leadership plays a role, but IMO that is not an excuse. MacK, Makar, Rants, Lehky, Toews, etc. these guys need to be leaders. Even if Landy comes back, he's not going to be the same. EJ isn't coming back. The Avs don't have the space to bring in vets who are impact players and provide it. It has to come from the group here. If they can't develop it, it won't ever come. If they are that reliant on the previous group, then they won't ever get it again.
I think the guy who needs to step up in that area more than anybody else is Makar.
How I'd state it... captains are the most overrated and romanticized spot in sports, until they are not. New York right now is a classic example of when leadership falls apart.I've often wondered about just how important these roles truly are in professional sports and just how much of it has been romanticized by jouralists throughout the years. For all of Landy's wonderful abilities, it was Cogliano who gave the speech that made the difference. That's not a knock on Landy by any means at all, but rather just showing that it doesn't have to be a C that does the leadership. For all the crap that we have rightfully given RyJo... what he did for Josh Manson is the absolute epitomy of leadership.
Is the C as imperative as we make it out to be? Or is it a bit overblown/dramaticized?
That’s true, that’s why I said we’ll be fine if everyone comes back (including Landy) and this team stays healthy which is a big ifThat schedule wasn't nearly as easy as it was made to sound. The 'bad' teams in there were not nearly as bad as previous years.. IE instead of the Sharks not even being a .300 team, they are more of a .410 team. Then the Seattle/Utah/Isles/Ottawa group.. instead of being ~.400 teams they are pushing .500 and in some cases pushing up to the playoffs. The whole weakness was always a myth. It wasn't an overly strong schedule to start, but it wasn't overly weak either.
On getting guys back, sure they'll be back, but others will go out too. The injury bug is just who this team is and will always be.
I think there is a difference between "locker room issue" and lack of leadership. However, it's easy to see how a lack of leadership can result in a locker room issue, it doesn't always. Heck, even with a great C there will be locker room issues and much failure.If there's a locker room issue 'still' even after moving out the goalies, then that's really the first thing that needs to be addressed.