WaitingForThatCab
Iconic.
- Mar 11, 2017
- 17,440
- 28,841
Pickard was fine? Why the hell would they go back to Skinner? lol
It happens often enough. I imagine they will get value on one of the two. Either retain McDavid and lose Drai for free or lose both but get value for Mcdavid.Because you don’t lose assets like that for free, or heads will roll.
I don’t think there is any confidence left to lose. It is a strange coaching decision to start the shaken SkinnerGame is in Edmonton.
If Skinner lets in a goal early it could get ugly with the hometown crowd
Canucks need to come out hard and get the lead so Skinner starts to get flustered and his team loses confidence in him.
Canucks suck
We dont need many shots to score on skinner. 10 shots = 4 goalsCanucks gona lose cuz of PDO right?
Knoblauch thinks he is playing 5 D chess but he is just playing checkersPickard was fine? Why the hell would they go back to Skinner? lol
Fireable decision when Skinner stinks it up.
And him actually performing will only ensure the coach doesn't get fired. This has been McDavid's worst series in many years.McDavid : No one is going to fire you coach, don't worry.
And him actually performing will only ensure the coach doesn't get fired. This has been McDavid's worst series in many years.
Oh yeah, despite my overhwleming negativity at the roster.. we are winning tonight. This baby is going 7! I have not changed my vote once. I've said 7 from day 1!
How on earth could a HC look at the performances of both goalies and determine Skinner is the better option? Sans Pickard being injured, that is an inexcusable decision. Fireable decision when Skinner stinks it up.
Even if Edmonton wins, it will be 4-3 or 5-4. Pickard's confidence is shaken from being benched for no good reason. Then, you face the possibility of Skinner vs Demko in game 7 on the road.