Toggle sidebar

WCSF Vancouver Canucks vs Edmonton Oilers. (Series tied 3-3)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Leonardo87

Leonardo87

New York Rangers, Anaheim Ducks, and TMNT fan.
Sponsor
Dec 8, 2013
42,259
68,656
New York
IMG_6101.jpeg


Vancouver Canucks vs Edmonton Oilers
WCSF

***Mod notes***

We understand this will be an intense series filled with emotions. We ask that you refrain from personal attacks towards others members, fans, and cities.

If you feel someone is baiting or trolling you, please report it rather than reply. Thank you.​
Click to read more...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: Rafafouille, trellaine201, LickTheEnvelope and 31 others
WetcoastOrca said:
It’s weird because the Oilers had good defensive stats after the coaching change.
But having Ceci-Nurse as your second pair just doesn’t inspire confidence that the group is on par with Nashville’s.
In fact, I always thought the Oilers D would be their undoing.
I just can’t see that group holding up against Colorado or Dallas even if they get by the Canucks.
Click to expand...

Ceci and Nurse have dirt on management and coaching - only way to explain their ice time/deployment. Everyone and their dog could see that pairing would be the thing to kill the oilers. Playing out in real time like it did the last couple years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TruKnyte, 0494, WetcoastOrca and 2 others
WetcoastOrca said:
It’s weird because the Oilers had good defensive stats after the coaching change.
But having Ceci-Nurse as your second pair just doesn’t inspire confidence that the group is on par with Nashville’s.
In fact, I always thought the Oilers D would be their undoing.
I just can’t see that group holding up against Colorado or Dallas even if they get by the Canucks.
Click to expand...
That pair has been sus all year, but I don't believe they or any other NHL calibre defensemen can have a worse game than that. Looked like two forwards moved back to play d on a beer league team and then preceeded to completely shit the bed.

I expect the oilers to have a bounceback game tomorrow but thought the Canucks also looked a little rusty so I expect them to be better too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas and WetcoastOrca
WetcoastOrca said:
It’s weird because the Oilers had good defensive stats after the coaching change.
But having Ceci-Nurse as your second pair just doesn’t inspire confidence that the group is on par with Nashville’s.
In fact, I always thought the Oilers D would be their undoing.
I just can’t see that group holding up against Colorado or Dallas even if they get by the Canucks.
Click to expand...

It was really more a compliment to Nashville I thought, Brunette got every guy buying in, the way they fronted shots & eliminated the middle of the ice was extremely impressive. They rly elevated their defensive game in the playoffs.

I do think EDM can play better defensively than they did but I don't know if its in their DNA to play that way for a full series like Nashville did, and it probably shouldn't when your as dangerous a rush team as they are to be fair. They want to be pressing & trying to get it up quick when a turnover happens.

I did think early on EDM looked more connected defensively than I was expecting but it kinda went away, I'm sure we'll see better in game 2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas, PavelBure10 and WetcoastOrca
Forgot About Drai said:
Ceci and Nurse have dirt on management and coaching - only way to explain their ice time/deployment. Everyone and their dog could see that pairing would be the thing to kill the oilers. Playing out in real time like it did the last couple years.
Click to expand...
Maybe all of this gets addressed if Holland retires this summer, you never know. They need a smarter dman to pair with Nurse because that pairing is an adventure in every zone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurnabyJoe7
Sergei Shirokov said:
It was really more a compliment to Nashville I thought, Brunette got every guy buying in, the way they fronted shots & eliminated the middle of the ice was extremely impressive. They rly elevated their defensive game in the playoffs.

I do think EDM can play better defensively than they did but I don't know if its in their DNA to play that way for a full series like Nashville did, and it probably shouldn't when your as dangerous a rush team as they are to be fair. They want to be pressing & trying to get it up quick when a turnover happens.

I did think early on EDM looked more connected defensively than I was expecting but it kinda went away, I'm sure we'll see better in game 2.
Click to expand...
Yeah I don’t think people gave Nashville the credit they deserved. The whole team bought in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JAK, eviohh26, MS and 4 others
pomx said:
EDM coach saying this wasn’t a melt down lol
Click to expand...

Well, he's not wrong. The Oilers managed 8 shots over the final two periods. A meltdown is more like what the Preds did in Game 4 where they blew it in overtime after largely controlling play throughout the game. The Canucks outplayed the Oilers for basically the last two periods. I guess if a team can "meltdown" over 2/3rds of the game, but that's usually just called getting outplayed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uhmkay and MS
Breakers said:
That edmonton PP is still beyond deadly
its gonna win them a few games I think so.

but people are realizing Vancouver's defensive structure is pretty legit 5v5
edmonton had like 12 shots with less than 6 minutes left in the 3rd
they turn the neutral zone into quick sand or attempt to.

the shot totals in nashville were very low.
Click to expand...

We've been absolutely stifling in terms of limiting shots/chances through the end of the season and through the first 7 games of the playoffs. Absolutely checking teams into the ground and it's why we've kept winning even when the scoring has dried up.

The structure and intensity Tocchet has the team playing with defensively is about as good as it gets and there are literally no weak matchups for the opposition to try to exploit. Miller-Pettersson-Lindholm-Blueger is four very good two-way/defensive Cs and then you have Hughes-Hronek, Zadorov-Cole, Soucy-Myers as your D pairings. No soft spots there, unlike Edmonton where their bottom-6 and the Nurse-Ceci pairing are prone to getting trucked.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JAK, Regress2TheMeme, ddawg1950 and 4 others
Coffey said:
Huge Jekyll and Hyde
Click to expand...

if by that you mean he's really good against a team that shots from far with barely any traffic and terrible system that doesn't allow for opportune scoring chances VS he's a sieve infront of actual solid teams

yeah Jekyll & Hyde
 
  • Like
Reactions: 333359
The funny thing with Skinner is that I thought he was actually really good through 40 minutes for Edmonton. Vancouver was absolutely carrying the play in the 2nd period and he made some really strong saves (plus the Garland breakaway early) and then Edmonton got two weird/weak goals and all of a sudden it's 4-1 and at that point I thought Skinner had probably been their best player and they were extremely fortunate to have that lead.

And then he just imploded in the 3rd period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sergei Shirokov and Angry Little Elf
Bobby9 said:
Hard to say. I think it would benefit the Oilers to some degree.
Click to expand...
Can’t be worse than what happened

MS said:
The funny thing with Skinner is that I thought he was actually really good through 40 minutes for Edmonton. Vancouver was absolutely carrying the play in the 2nd period and he made some really strong saves (plus the Garland breakaway early) and then Edmonton got two weird/weak goals and all of a sudden it's 4-1 and at that point I thought Skinner had probably been their best player and they were extremely fortunate to have that lead.

And then he just imploded in the 3rd period.
Click to expand...
It’s obvious to say that the GWG was a backbreaker, but what else was the defense supposed to do there? They pushed him to the outside and forced a horribly angled shot which snuck in. That goals all on Skinner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Angry Little Elf
BurnabyJoe7 said:
That pair has been sus all year, but I don't believe they or any other NHL calibre defensemen can have a worse game than that. Looked like two forwards moved back to play d on a beer league team and then preceeded to completely shit the bed.

I expect the oilers to have a bounceback game tomorrow but thought the Canucks also looked a little rusty so I expect them to be better too.
Click to expand...
Neither of them are NHL caliber defencemen though.
 
KingPuckChoo said:
if by that you mean he's really good against a team that shots from far with barely any traffic and terrible system that doesn't allow for opportune scoring chances VS he's a sieve infront of actual solid teams

yeah Jekyll & Hyde
Click to expand...
Not just comparing to the Kings series. During the season too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom