TheNumber4
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2011
- 44,136
- 55,030
I think he’s making good points.Complaining constantly like this when your team has been up the entire season is so f***ing embarrassing.
I think he’s making good points.Complaining constantly like this when your team has been up the entire season is so f***ing embarrassing.
Are you just ignoring the fact that Rantanen was the first one to throw a crosscheck well after the whistle?I was wondering the same thing. I have no skin in this game. I could care a less who wins. But. The guy intentionally high sticks him and bloodies his nose. Under what scenario is that not at least four minute penalty? Man the officiating this year has been atrocious.
I think he’s making good points.
Problem is he's not really moving into the guy he's just standing on ice that he already occupied when he had the puck and dropped it off. A guy doesn't have to move out of another guy's way the defending player has to go around him. What's far worse interference that often goes uncalled is when a team's attacking off the rush and one player drop passes and then drives the net pushing the D man back so he can't step up on the guy receiving the pass.Colorado has been doing it for years. The 1st one I could buy but the second one was blatant as hell and an obvious interference penalty.
Well its been a good game despite this crap thread
lol What does that possibly have to do with deciding?Whether a high stick that draws blood is four minutes or not?Are you just ignoring the fact that Rantanen was the first one to throw a crosscheck well after the whistle?
True. But can’t expect Avs fans to see it with homer goggles on. They think they “earn” all their penalties when their team dives constantly.Rantanen is a diving bitch and has been for years. Cracks me up how Colorado fans call him Moose when he's one of the softest players in the league.
Franchise learned it from Detroit in the Datsyuk years I think. Used to drive me crazy how good the Wings were at it.Colorado has been doing it for years. The 1st one I could buy but the second one was blatant as hell and an obvious interference penalty.
Could've called Rantanen for starting the whole scrum with a random cross check too.Whole Rantanen mess could've been avoided if the refs called MacKinnon for interference on one of those Avalanche Classic pick plays
Why? Who doesn’t enjoy accurate hockey takes.I'm shocked you think that.
This thread really adds something to the game. It's like we're all at the bar.Well its been a good game despite this crap thread
I think it's pretty obvious. You pick and choose what's worthy of criticism.lol What does that possibly have to do with deciding?Whether a high stick that draws blood is four minutes or not?
No oil fan is neutral when it comes to Avs games lol.Tonight I am a neutral fan. Just calling it like i see it.
Complaining constantly like this when your team has been up the entire series is so f***ing embarrassing.
Could've called Rantanen for starting the whole scrum with a random cross check too.
Avs fans need to open their eyes.