Relevant for the non-calls from game 2.
I still recall that, when I was questioning the NHL's credibility in their "wink wink nudge nudge you just gotta TRUST us" approach to holding refs...accou...accountable...
LMAO Sorry I really can't even say this shit with a straight face anymore...
Anyways...when I brought that up, it appears as though I was crazy to think that, when you give a bunch of zebras the ability to control the game and alter its outcome with ZERO transparency and ZERO responsibility, things can and will spiral out of control, based on how much the refs hate the team, how much they are paid off by other team, how spineless the refs are, and how long it takes for the refs to find their balls in their mothers' purses.
Now, to be fair, I know reffing is a hard job. Things happens at light speed, miss calls happen, bad calls happen, we're all human beings, mistakes are inevitable. I get it. But at the same time, when the league is unconditionally shielding the zebras from 100% of scrutiny, they are, to the outsiders' eyes, operating with ZERO repercussion when they screw up. I'm not saying what Sweeney suggesting is totally correct - have the refs in front of the media is, as much as I revel in the thought, not gonna end well. But there HAS to be something the public can see other than wink wink nudge nudge.