- Aug 3, 2021
- 1,483
- 3,597
They are all busily revising their Oilers in 4, …,errr Oilers in 5…Oilers in 6 predictions.Hopefully someone can update that ESPN list again tonight!
Bowman is one of the best coaches of all time and never had a lick of professional hockey as a player.Oilers coach has not even played in the minor leagues, his coaching record mostly consists of junior leagues, Canucks coach has an NHL career that has 952pts and 2972 PIMs in 1144 GP, with one Cup as a player and two as Assistant Coach.
I think those sort of reflect their coaching philosophies. One has been in the trenches, and one hasn't.
Bowman is one of the best coaches of all time and never had a lick of professional hockey as a player.
I wouldn't say the experience of playing the sport professionally doesn't matter, but it's overrated and we're seeing that because more professional coaches are coaching sports that they've never been professional athletes in.
RT is a great coach and I respect him despite his whiny interviews this round, but we haven't seen Knoblauch adjust anything substantial until we played the kings in round 1.
Goaltending is obviously the x factor but I think RT is the one who will be looking to make some changes based on how the last 2 games played out.
They should play more conservatively anyway. They played their best hockey this year when they played defensively.So do the Oilers change their game because Pickard is in net? More conservative break outs etc?
Go to 30 seconds and listen for a minute or so. Still my absolute favorite answer on hits.lol
McDavid scores 3 goals and 4 assists tonight. Draisaitl scores 2 goals 3 assists.
Their game plan is to play McDrai 30 minutes, score on the PP, shelter the Ceci-Nurse pairing who are a combined minus 14 and have the bottom six skate around for a few minutes to give McDrai a rest.So do the Oilers change their game because Pickard is in net? More conservative break outs etc?
dont forget switching the goalies for a breatherTheir game plan is to play McDrai 30 minutes, score on the PP, shelter the Ceci-Nurse pairing who are a combined minus 14 and have the bottom six skate around for a few minutes to give McDrai a rest.
4) Go 6 on 5 all game.
If McDavid & Draisaitl can play 60 mins it might not be the worst option
When Fred Shero coached the 1974 expansion Philadelphia Flyers against the best team in the world, the Boston Bruins, his famous strategy was to have the guys dump into Bobby Orr's corner every chance they got.So here is something I wanted to discuss with you lovely people.
Coaching philosophies. I was listening to the Oilers coach, and he was asked multiple times about physicality, hits, intensity, and tenacity.
He was asked if it’s overrated, if it’s not a big indicator, etc.
His answer surprised me. In multiple interviews, he basically said that it’s not a good gauge. Physicality is overblown, and hits especially mean nothing. Go back and listen to three of his last four interviews; he goes in-depth on this.
In contrast, the Canucks coach keeps talking about physicality, intensity, how players have to be strong on the puck, need to hit hard, forecheck hard, and how it’s an incredibly important gauge to see and match teams' intensities or dictate your own.
He said that if you’re playing hard, you’re naturally going to hit more, which usually is a good indicator of how hard you’re working for that specific game.
So my question to you guys is: which style/opinion do you believe in more?
probably nothing more that they are 2-1 in the series.What do the gambling odds makers know that we don't? Oilers are -200.
So here is something I wanted to discuss with you lovely people.
Coaching philosophies. I was listening to the Oilers coach, and he was asked multiple times about physicality, hits, intensity, and tenacity.
He was asked if it’s overrated, if it’s not a big indicator, etc.
His answer surprised me. In multiple interviews, he basically said that it’s not a good gauge. Physicality is overblown, and hits especially mean nothing. Go back and listen to three of his last four interviews; he goes in-depth on this.
In contrast, the Canucks coach keeps talking about physicality, intensity, how players have to be strong on the puck, need to hit hard, forecheck hard, and how it’s an incredibly important gauge to see and match teams' intensities or dictate your own.
He said that if you’re playing hard, you’re naturally going to hit more, which usually is a good indicator of how hard you’re working for that specific game.
So my question to you guys is: which style/opinion do you believe in more?
It’s a Hail Mary. Lets see if it works. Maybe he’s hoping the Oilers tighten up defensively?I knew Pickard was a possibility but still a bit surprised to see it actually happen.
probably nothing more that they are 2-1 in the series.
Know your limit; play within it. Also good strategy probably for the Oilers.
The avs and red wings games of the late 90s are a little different than the games today. Someone watching that series compared to any series today might think they're watching a different sport.Ask Bowman about his stance on physicality in playoffs.
I mean it does.I think Pickard is the right call. If he's worse than Skinner, does it really matter? You can't win with Skinner.