Stelio Kontos
Registered User
- Nov 6, 2011
- 1,007
- 574
I’m convinced the tnt panel hits the dab pen heavy during the game.
Even if they do, these two goals is such a confidence builder for the Canucks. They can turn it on for 1 minute, and crank up that skill meter to overwhelm the pred.sNow watch Nashville win it in the first minute of overtime
I’m convinced the tnt panel hits the dab pen heavy during the game.
Reminds me of when the Bruins would put Chara in front of the net on their awful PP out of pure desperation. Funnily enough they won the cup that year.Rick Tocchet goes as far Boeser will take him. His big idea for the net empty was Zadorov as the screen
Rene Bourque said he was happy to get the 2 points after a playoff win because he was just in generic response mode.Happy to get the point.
No, he was expecting Quinn to continue backing up while corralling the puck and Gus was going to pin him against the boards. Quinn just stopped on a dime with full control of the puck.Exactly. It was a GOOD play by Hughes, but Nyquist was thinking about the empty net instead of just getting the puck out.
Always appreciate your deep analysis.Silovs is mediocre. Saros evens the field by being worse.
Three attackers and he's making himself as small as possible (already the smallest goalie in the league) and he's going for low % poke check that's horrible defense and horrible goaltending.You're protecting a one-goal lead with 10 seconds left and you leave your goalie alone with three attackers and the puck.
View attachment 861418
Canucks can’t win with such low 5on5 offense production. This is essentially live or die by special teams for them.And yet the Predators who presumably are supposed to be good defensively can't win a puck battle.
Isn't that how everyone works?I’m convinced the tnt panel hits the dab pen heavy during the game.
It's a great analysis. Silovs wasn't challenged much. Saros makes a lot of stupid plays.Always appreciate your deep analysis.