it absolutely isn't a meaningless tournament. You thinking so doesn't mean it is so.
Let's play the game then, before the thread expires.
Winning actual best on best tournaments means that the winning team has beaten the best from other countries, either directly or by beating the teams that beat the others. That is not a possible conclusion in this tournament so... what exactly is the meaning?
If looked at as purely an entertaining exhibition, which seems to be a popular opinion, that is at least justifiable. If someone finds the entertainment value of an all star exhibition meaningful, then perhaps that can be explained. As a serious competition, it has no meaning at all though. Expecting a childish response since you've sworn not to let people say that the meaningless tournament is meaningless, even though you have no power to do so, but who knows what will come.
Funny thing is, unlike your inaccurate understanding of "international", "best on best" and "gimmick", whether or not this tournament is meaningful is pretty subjective. Neither side can factually be proven correct, mine included, so I don't fully understand why you feel that you need to, or that you even can, silence people who disagree with your subjective opinion. I applaud the effort in advance though.
Careful man, he has pictures at his disposal, and apparently he knows how to post them. Words aren't working to defend the weak positions, so pictures it will be.