Watching the Lightning (Streaming & TV) | Page 10 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
Toggle sidebar

Watching the Lightning (Streaming & TV)

Fans also will have the option to purchase season plans on a direct-to-consumer basis through the Lightning’s app. Price details will be announced at the end of summer, but they are expected to be less than $1 a game.
Click to expand...
Is that based on an 82-game season, or the 70~ we get?

They'd have to have multiple plans. A discounted full-season, or per month.

edit: Vegas and Fl*r*d* both seem to only have season passes for $70 (P*nth*rs STMs get an additional discount). Where's the on-ramp for people joining after the Super Bowl?
 
Last edited:
1747237345865.webp
 
Felonious Python said:
Is that based on an 82-game season, or the 70~ we get?

They'd have to have multiple plans. A discounted full-season, or per month.

edit: Vegas and Fl*r*d* both seem to only have season passes for $70 (P*nth*rs STMs get an additional discount). Where's the on-ramp for people joining after the Super Bowl?
Click to expand...
it's OTA, so no money at all. but yeah, the national broadcasts wont be shown (ESPN, HBO MAX, TNT, NHL Network, etc.)
 
RussianGuyovich said:
it's OTA, so no money at all. but yeah, the national broadcasts wont be shown (ESPN, HBO MAX, TNT, NHL Network, etc.)
Click to expand...
OTA only really matters for TV viewers where the signal is available.

edit: so the question for me becomes, what kind of schedule for free internet games should they adopt? Afternoon games are typically associated with kids. Or maybe a certain day of the week.

I do like that the team can call an audible and make a certain game free for everyone. Does it diminish the price of the passes? Sure, but then don't overdo it.
 
Last edited:
RussianGuyovich said:
Yes? also the streaming is regionally locked too.

this is strictly for in-market. if you're out of market, you watch the ESPN+ whatever horseshit that they have next season
Click to expand...
Orlando or Pensacola are in Lightning territory, but outside the Tampa Bay television market. We'll probably get some type of OTA and cable availability, but the Lightning have to be able to capture people watching on different devices. I haven't watched a game on TV in years. It's all PC for me now.
 
Felonious Python said:
Orlando or Pensacola are in Lightning territory, but outside the Tampa Bay television market. We'll probably get some type of OTA and cable availability, but the Lightning have to be able to capture people watching on different devices. I haven't watched a game on TV in years. It's all PC for me now.
Click to expand...
im not like, defending anything here. im just conveying the intent of this. it's to make the games more accessible for the fans, so that the real revenue (gate) can be protected by increasing/placating the fan base. so, they are not as concerned about people out of market, as well as the fact that there is already national NHL television contracts with coverage that they (im sure) legally cannot interfere.
 
RussianGuyovich said:
im not like, defending anything here. im just conveying the intent of this. it's to make the games more accessible for the fans, so that the real revenue (gate) can be protected by increasing/placating the fan base. so, they are not as concerned about people out of market, as well as the fact that there is already national NHL television contracts with coverage that they (im sure) legally cannot interfere.
Click to expand...
I don't see a downside to offering both yearly and monthly payment plans. FanDuelSN and ESPN+ do that. That's accessible.

The flywheel for internet viewers should be: free weekly game into monthly sub into yearly sub.

Having a 4 Nations and then asking a newbie to pay $70 for like the last two months of the regular season is asking a lot.

OTA has its own subset of the audience.
 
Felonious Python said:
I don't see a downside to offering both yearly and monthly payment plans. FanDuelSN and ESPN+ do that. That's accessible.

The flywheel for internet viewers should be: free weekly game into monthly sub into yearly sub.

Having a 4 Nations and then asking a newbie to pay $70 for like the last two months of the regular season is asking a lot.

OTA has its own subset of the audience.
Click to expand...
Well, like I said, In market is covered as free. And going out of market is probably a legal issue.
 
Help me out...will this station be on Spectrum? Frontier? Online only?

Games will be free on the app to folks living in the TB area?

Cash grab?
 
T REX said:
Help me out...will this station be on Spectrum? Frontier? Online only?

Games will be free on the app to folks living in the TB area?

Cash grab?
Click to expand...
They're probably negotiating right now to get on Spectrum and Frontier. No obvious reason it doesn't get done though. My understanding is streaming through the app would be paid. If you don't want to pay it'll be free via antenna if you can't get it through cable.
 
Hoek said:
Just got a flat antenna and looks like I pick up WXPX 66 just fine so I might be cutting the cord soon.
Click to expand...
Can I ask what brand and/or model? Buying antennas is probably a pretty new thing for most of us. (and honestly a lot of junk marketing. 1000-mile range, get CNN and ESPN, etc.)

edit:
There are some links in the OP for antennas, just for a situation like this. To check if you can likely get WXPX 66, then check your address at rabbitears.info.

WXPX 66's transmitter is in Bradenton, for reference.


Looking at 66's information, I see it's only a 720p signal. If you're used to 1080p or better, then adjust your expectations.

66's coverage map.
It's actually not great coverage for parts of TB. In Brooksville, the signal is already 'poor'. Lake Wales is 'fair'.
 
Last edited:
  • Wow
Reactions: T REX
Felonious Python said:
Can I ask what brand and/or model? Buying antennas is probably a pretty new thing for most of us. (and honestly a lot of junk marketing. 1000-mile range, get CNN and ESPN, etc.)
Click to expand...
After reading some reviews, mostly WireCutter, I just got the Channel Master Flatenna might be able to get it cheaper on Amazon there was a lightning deal (heh) at the time I checked. RabbitEars said the signal was 'Good' in my location. If you're a bit further out with worse signal it might be better to get the amplified version, but if you're close to the station with a strong signal then amplification might make things worse as it boosts any noise too. I'm also able to pick up the other major broadcast networks even though most of them are VHF and supposedly those aren't picked up by flat antennas very well. A lot of people on Reddit swear by the old fashioned rabbit ear antennas to pick up VHF stations better with the extendable arms. Flat antennas are just nice because they're a little easier to hide or put out of the way since they stick to the wall. I have a wall that faces most of the stations so it works out decent. Also you don't have to get Channel Master there's a lot of copy cats including Best Buy's own.

My understanding is a lot of sports are broadcast in 720p anyway because it's higher framerate. Or maybe that's old news. I just know back in the day it was either 720p at 60 fps or 1080i at 30 fps, which only looked decent because TVs would de-interlace and interpolate frames.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Felonious Python
Hoek said:
After reading some reviews, mostly WireCutter, I just got the Channel Master Flatenna might be able to get it cheaper on Amazon there was a lightning deal (heh) at the time I checked. RabbitEars said the signal was 'Good' in my location. If you're a bit further out with worse signal it might be better to get the amplified version, but if you're close to the station with a strong signal then amplification might make things worse as it boosts any noise too. I'm also able to pick up the other major broadcast networks even though most of them are VHF and supposedly those aren't picked up by flat antennas very well. A lot of people on Reddit swear by the old fashioned rabbit ear antennas to pick up VHF stations better with the extendable arms. Flat antennas are just nice because they're a little easier to hide or put out of the way since they stick to the wall. I have a wall that faces most of the stations so it works out decent. Also you don't have to get Channel Master there's a lot of copy cats including Best Buy's own.

My understanding is a lot of sports are broadcast in 720p anyway because it's higher framerate. Or maybe that's old news. I just know back in the day it was either 720p at 60 fps or 1080i at 30 fps, which only looked decent because TVs would de-interlace and interpolate frames.
Click to expand...
This explains it pretty well. The video being a few years old is fine. We aren't talking about the latest and greatest technological breakthroughs.
 
The code is SPRINGSAVINGS

There is some hockey to be found on Peacock. Notre Dame games in particular, but they've got Premier League and NFL as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 1, guests: 2)

Latest posts

Ad

Ad

Top Bottom