wetcoast
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2018
- 25,641
- 12,330
Agree with alot of this but even at his peak 3 years he was only 6th in goals and 8th in points.With all these descriptive terms, like "elite", it depends a bit on what you put into them yourself, but Palffy was definitely an upper echelon talent, though obviously not on a say Jagr type of level, or even a Bure or Selänne level.
But it's funny if you've seen those old photos of Palffy in juniors where he wears #68 and sports the exact same mullet as Jagr. He looks just like Jagr, except the size.
Perhaps if he had Jagr's size, he could have been really dominant. But I guess you can play that hypothetical game with most players. Size comes with both pros and cons, and you need to be able to adapt your game accordingly.
But I always found Palffy way more offensively well-rounded than countrymen such as Bondra and later Gaborik. He couldn't just score goals, but make plays and drive a line properly as well. I would also prefer him in front of someone like Gartner, fairly easily.
If the thread question was "Was Palffy more elite than Gartner?" then I would say, yeah, he was.
NHL Stats
The official source for NHL Stats including skaters, goalies, teams stats and more.
![www.nhl.com](https://www.nhl.com/assets/icons/fav/nhl/favicon-32x32.png)
Then injuries happen and he gets traded to LA where he does quite well but injuries every year, then lockout plays a half season with Pittsburg with limited PP TOI, at a PPG level then leaves for good.
Very good player when healthy but elite seems like a stretch.