was this a blatant hook? led to dallas’ tying goal

[hirawl]

Botched sell job by Johnson.

 

[ItWasJustified]

Not a hook, he grabs the Dallas players stick and falls on it. Not sure why.

To me it looks like he's focusing on grabbing the Dallas stick and when he misses it he loses his balance.

 

[kingsholygrail]

Most blatant? No.

 

[Dynamite Time]

You can see where Harley uses both of his hands to pull his stick loose; was it held by Johnson or a hook that caught equipment and was a hook the refs didn’t see?

Not a blatant missed call, not sure myself though after watching the replay numerous times.

 

[10 Ply Labradoodle]

Certainly not a hook. Looked like a hold that spun the Cbus player, but rather than continuing to play his position he tried to embellish for a call.

I'm more interested in the goalie having two sticks and tossing the player's stick aside. By the rulebook, I think the way he tossed it should be called as an automatic minor (if Dallas doesn't score on the play).

 

[Spawn]

Looks like a situation where the ref either called both or called neither and he decided neither.

CBJ player looks like he clamps down on the stick to try and get a call and gets burned by it.

 

[ijuka]

Definitely not a hook.

If anything, holding with the left hand.

I might have called one for holding, other for embellishment.

 

[Mulletman]

No. It was the right call by the refs. Plus Dallas needed this win way more than Columbus did...

 

[AnInjuredJasonZucker]

Not a hook. Slight hold with the left hand. The CBJ player grabbed the stick and dove. Would have been a weak call on the hold, so no issue with how it played out.