GDT: Wait we have a game? (11/20, Canes vs Rangers)
- Thread starter DaveG
- Start date
- Oct 31, 2007
- 40,643
- 47,247
Man, at first I was in that thread to argue, but seeing how worked up they are over it, I'm just feeding the flames now. 
Anton Dubinchuk
aho
Unsustainable
Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
Unsustainable
Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
Man, at first I was in that thread to argue, but seeing how worked up they are over it, I'm just feeding the flames now.
Just keep posting our line up to show how invalid their argument is.
Next 5 games:
@ Rangers
@ Devils
@ Lightning
Canadiens
@ Penguins
We should be okay.
tarheelhockey
Offside Review Specialist
The brutal reality is that we have no bandwagoners. The folks that hang around this board are serious hockey fans, so we have a lot less than our fair share of knuckleheads these days.
Unsustainable
Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
Unsustainable
Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
I spent about 450 on tonight's game.
122 for the hotel, 50 on gas, 80 on food, and club seats.
Unsustainable
Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
DaveG
Noted Jerk
I just don't get how some of these people can be like zomg karma **** you Ward **** you right up the *****.
No, karma was the ref calling that play off to begin with considering Brassard should have been called for a very obvious GI.
We still have bandwagoners (I work with a couple dozen), just not here... thank god for that.
No, karma was the ref calling that play off to begin with considering Brassard should have been called for a very obvious GI.
We still have bandwagoners (I work with a couple dozen), just not here... thank god for that.
Vagrant
The Czech Condor
I think that HF is generally harder to find than the traditional outlets. With everything being pretty immersive in the facebook experience, we have less people joining. Plus, this is a pretty intimidating board to have an unpopular opinion on. We've all been on the wrong side of that a few times, but most of us aren't babies and can move on from being summarily discredited by each other on one issue or another. But I can see why someone browsing might decide to stay browsing when they come across such an instance. I know for a fact that we've run a few people off of these boards that we might consider on the facebook spectrum.
tarheelhockey
Offside Review Specialist
DaveG
Noted Jerk
I've literally been told as much by people Vagrant, including a couple non-Canes media types I know.
"I couldn't handle that place, you're absolutely all over eachother when someone's clearly wrong or being controversial about something. Not saying you're wrong about that either, I just couldn't handle that place. You guys simply seem to be on another level when it comes to being fans."
"I couldn't handle that place, you're absolutely all over eachother when someone's clearly wrong or being controversial about something. Not saying you're wrong about that either, I just couldn't handle that place. You guys simply seem to be on another level when it comes to being fans."
DaveG
Noted Jerk
Hey guys. Can you do me a favor and beat us on Tuesday? I want my team in on the Mcdavid sweepstakes. I also want Deboer fired. Pretty please! 
DaveG
Noted Jerk
Finnish Jerk Train
lol stupid mickey mouse organization
We got outworked, except for when we went balls to the wall in OT. Ward is the only reason we have one point, and even he needed a little bit of luck on his side.
And yes, this board is intimidating to outsiders, both in attitude and the level of knowledge most of you guys possess. Before I came here, I looked around me and thought I knew hockey better than most people. Among casual fans, that's probably still true, but this board is on a whole other level that I can barely scratch the surface of. It's like going from Mediocre State University to the Ivy League and I'm just starting to figure things out, which is why I tend to keep my mouth shut unless I'm sure I know what I'm talking about.
And yes, this board is intimidating to outsiders, both in attitude and the level of knowledge most of you guys possess. Before I came here, I looked around me and thought I knew hockey better than most people. Among casual fans, that's probably still true, but this board is on a whole other level that I can barely scratch the surface of. It's like going from Mediocre State University to the Ivy League and I'm just starting to figure things out, which is why I tend to keep my mouth shut unless I'm sure I know what I'm talking about.
Ole Gil
Registered User
- May 9, 2009
- 5,764
- 9,204
I don't think we are any more right than other places. We just have much more informed stupid opinions.
Unsustainable
Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
- Oct 31, 2007
- 40,643
- 47,247
It's a combination of things. We're definitely more knowledgeable (on the whole) than a lot of other places, but we're also more pessimistic and bitter (on the whole) than a lot of other places.
Thus, when an outsider comes in, their opinion is generally poorly received unless it flows with the groupthink of the board and the negative vibe this board gets sometimes can feel like its directed at them rather than simply being the result of many, many years of many, many terrible games.
Thus, when an outsider comes in, their opinion is generally poorly received unless it flows with the groupthink of the board and the negative vibe this board gets sometimes can feel like its directed at them rather than simply being the result of many, many years of many, many terrible games.
last night i had a dream about this game
except this time lundqvist was leaving the net for a delayed penalty and he collided with brassard and he hit him so hard that lundqvist's legs fell off
he was okay after surgery tho
except this time lundqvist was leaving the net for a delayed penalty and he collided with brassard and he hit him so hard that lundqvist's legs fell off
he was okay after surgery tho
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)
- Latest: bernmeister
-
