Vince McMahon sexual assault lawsuit - John Laurinaitis and WWE named as defendants
- Thread starter John Price
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Voight
#winning
JianYang
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 20,186
- 20,342
Bros per 60 were through the roof.... I think mushnik even told him to stop calling him bro lol
DaaaaB's
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2004
- 8,752
- 2,297
I've never seen so many morons in one video. Maven and Coach are the only ones with brains in their heads.
sabremike
SAVE OUR SABRES: PEGULA OUT!!!!!!!!
I'd say the only non moron was the guy who has been completely and totally vindicated by everything that has come out in the past few months.
DaaaaB's
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2004
- 8,752
- 2,297
If you're referring to Mushnick, I don't disagree with him on Vince but he's still an absolute immature jackass who refuses to say anything positive about the industry and won't admit it changed after the 90's. The man is incapable of having a civilized conversation.
BostonBob
4 Ever The Greatest
Vince McMahon settled his case with the SEC on Thursday. He certainly got off pretty easy as he agreed to pay a $400,000 civil penalty plus he has to reimburse the WWE $1.33 million after consenting to an order finding that he violated the Securities Exchange Act.
The SEC issued the follwing statement:
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against Vince McMahon, the former Executive Chairman and CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment Inc., for signing two settlement agreements, one in 2019 and one in 2022, on behalf of himself and WWE without disclosing the agreements to WWE’s Board of Directors, legal department, accountants, financial reporting personnel, or auditor. Doing so circumvented WWE’s system of internal accounting controls and caused material misstatements in WWE’s 2018 and 2021 financial statements.
According to the SEC’s order, one settlement agreement obligated McMahon to pay a former employee $3 million in exchange for the former employee’s agreement to not disclose her relationship with McMahon and her release of potential claims against WWE and McMahon, and the second agreement obligated McMahon to pay a former WWE independent contractor $7.5 million in exchange for the independent contractor’s agreement to not disclose her allegations against McMahon and her release of potential claims against WWE and McMahon. The order finds that, because McMahon failed to disclose the agreements to WWE, WWE did not evaluate the disclosure implications or the appropriate accounting for these transactions in its financial statements. The SEC’s order finds that, because the payments required by the 2019 and 2022 agreements were not recorded, WWE overstated its 2018 net income by approximately 8 percent and its 2021 net income by approximately 1.7 percent. In addition, according to the order, these payments should have been disclosed as related party transactions.
The order further finds that McMahon signed management representation letters that were provided to WWE’s auditor that did not disclose the existence of either settlement agreement. After learning of the settlement agreements, WWE issued a restatement of its financial statements in August 2022.
“Company executives cannot enter into material agreements on behalf of the company they serve and withhold that information from the company’s control functions and auditor,” said Thomas P. Smith Jr., Associate Regional Director in the New York Regional Office.
McMahon consented to the entry of the SEC’s order finding that he violated the Securities Exchange Act by knowingly circumventing WWE’s internal accounting controls and that he directly or indirectly made or caused to be made false or misleading statements to WWE’s auditor. The order also finds that McMahon caused WWE’s violations of the reporting and books and records provisions of the Exchange Act. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, McMahon agreed to cease-and-desist from violating those provisions, pay a $400,000 civil penalty, and reimburse WWE $1,330,915.90 pursuant to Section 304(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Peter Pizzani, Mala Bartucci, Kenneth Gottlieb, Diego Brucculeri, Travis Hill, Liora Sukhatme, and Alison Conn and was supervised by Mr. Smith, all of the New York Regional Office, and had assistance from Chyhe K. Becker and Tyler Remick of the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis.
The SEC issued the follwing statement:
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against Vince McMahon, the former Executive Chairman and CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment Inc., for signing two settlement agreements, one in 2019 and one in 2022, on behalf of himself and WWE without disclosing the agreements to WWE’s Board of Directors, legal department, accountants, financial reporting personnel, or auditor. Doing so circumvented WWE’s system of internal accounting controls and caused material misstatements in WWE’s 2018 and 2021 financial statements.
According to the SEC’s order, one settlement agreement obligated McMahon to pay a former employee $3 million in exchange for the former employee’s agreement to not disclose her relationship with McMahon and her release of potential claims against WWE and McMahon, and the second agreement obligated McMahon to pay a former WWE independent contractor $7.5 million in exchange for the independent contractor’s agreement to not disclose her allegations against McMahon and her release of potential claims against WWE and McMahon. The order finds that, because McMahon failed to disclose the agreements to WWE, WWE did not evaluate the disclosure implications or the appropriate accounting for these transactions in its financial statements. The SEC’s order finds that, because the payments required by the 2019 and 2022 agreements were not recorded, WWE overstated its 2018 net income by approximately 8 percent and its 2021 net income by approximately 1.7 percent. In addition, according to the order, these payments should have been disclosed as related party transactions.
The order further finds that McMahon signed management representation letters that were provided to WWE’s auditor that did not disclose the existence of either settlement agreement. After learning of the settlement agreements, WWE issued a restatement of its financial statements in August 2022.
“Company executives cannot enter into material agreements on behalf of the company they serve and withhold that information from the company’s control functions and auditor,” said Thomas P. Smith Jr., Associate Regional Director in the New York Regional Office.
McMahon consented to the entry of the SEC’s order finding that he violated the Securities Exchange Act by knowingly circumventing WWE’s internal accounting controls and that he directly or indirectly made or caused to be made false or misleading statements to WWE’s auditor. The order also finds that McMahon caused WWE’s violations of the reporting and books and records provisions of the Exchange Act. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, McMahon agreed to cease-and-desist from violating those provisions, pay a $400,000 civil penalty, and reimburse WWE $1,330,915.90 pursuant to Section 304(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Peter Pizzani, Mala Bartucci, Kenneth Gottlieb, Diego Brucculeri, Travis Hill, Liora Sukhatme, and Alison Conn and was supervised by Mr. Smith, all of the New York Regional Office, and had assistance from Chyhe K. Becker and Tyler Remick of the Division of Economic and Risk Analysis.
BostonBob
4 Ever The Greatest
And of course Vince just doesn't know when to STFU and issued his own statement on Thursday:
“The case is closed. Today ends nearly three years of investigation by different governmental agencies. There has been a great deal of speculation about what exactly the government was investigating and what the outcome would be. As today’s resolution shows, much of that speculation was misguided and misleading.
“In the end, there was never anything more to this than minor accounting errors with regard to some personal payments that I made several years ago while I was CEO of WWE. I’m thrilled that I can now put all this behind me.”
Which led to this statement from Ann Callis who is the attorney for Janel Grant:
During his time leading WWE, Vince McMahon acted as if rules did not apply to him, and now we have confirmation that he repeatedly broke the law to cover up his horrifying behavior, including human trafficking. The SEC’s charges prove that the NDA Vince McMahon coerced Ms. Grant into signing violates the law, and therefore her case must be heard in court. While prosecutors for the Southern District of New York continue their criminal investigation, we look forward to bringing forward new evidence in our civil case about the sexual exploitation Ms. Grant endured at WWE by Vince McMahon and John Laurinaitis.
“The case is closed. Today ends nearly three years of investigation by different governmental agencies. There has been a great deal of speculation about what exactly the government was investigating and what the outcome would be. As today’s resolution shows, much of that speculation was misguided and misleading.
“In the end, there was never anything more to this than minor accounting errors with regard to some personal payments that I made several years ago while I was CEO of WWE. I’m thrilled that I can now put all this behind me.”
Which led to this statement from Ann Callis who is the attorney for Janel Grant:
During his time leading WWE, Vince McMahon acted as if rules did not apply to him, and now we have confirmation that he repeatedly broke the law to cover up his horrifying behavior, including human trafficking. The SEC’s charges prove that the NDA Vince McMahon coerced Ms. Grant into signing violates the law, and therefore her case must be heard in court. While prosecutors for the Southern District of New York continue their criminal investigation, we look forward to bringing forward new evidence in our civil case about the sexual exploitation Ms. Grant endured at WWE by Vince McMahon and John Laurinaitis.
BostonBob
4 Ever The Greatest
The WWE has responded to the latest statement ( posted above ) from Janel Grant's attorney.
from 411mania.com:
WWE has joined Vince McMahon in filing a response opposing Janel Grant’s request for a status conference in her ongoing lawsuit against them. As reported on Tuesday, Grant’s team requested the status conference in a filing where they said they wanted “to inform the Court of the new status quo and request its guidance on how best to move this litigation forward” after the SEC announcement of McMahon’s settlement of charges made by the organization by paying a $400,000 fine and reimbursing $1.3 million to WWE. McMahon’s attorney then announced that day that they had filed a request opposing the request, with a statement sent to 411 and other outlets that read:
“The recent federal investigation resulted in no criminal indictments from the SDNY, while the SEC settlement relates to minor accounting issues at WWE that have nothing to do with this case. Any claims to the contrary made by Janel Grant’s team are just another desperate PR stunt.”
PWInsider reports that WWE also filed a motion on January 14th opposing Grant’s request, arguing that “Although Grant’s motion is styled as a request for a status conference, it effectively is an improper and belated request” to extend the deadline for their battle over whether the case should be moved to arbitration. WWE argued that Grant’s Grant’s request for an extension in order to respond due to the announcement of the SEC charges is “untimely” and that Grant’s team has “not shown good cause” for an extension.
The filing also noted:
“…the recently announced SEC settlement with McMahon has no bearing whatsoever on Defendants’ motions to compel and does not warrant an extension of Grant’s time to oppose the motions. Grant makes the conclusory assertion that the consent order “necessitate additional time for her counsel to assess these developments and incorporate these new (and still developing) facts into her Amended Complaint.” But it is unclear, and Grant does not explain, how the SEC’s cease-and-desist order against McMahon for violations of accounting- and disclosure-related offenses could have any bearing on the enforceability and scope of the arbitration provision that is the predicate for Defendants’ motions to compel. Grant’s reference to McMahon’s settlement with the SEC is a red herring and does not provide good cause for an extension of time to oppose Defendants’ motions.”
from 411mania.com:
WWE has joined Vince McMahon in filing a response opposing Janel Grant’s request for a status conference in her ongoing lawsuit against them. As reported on Tuesday, Grant’s team requested the status conference in a filing where they said they wanted “to inform the Court of the new status quo and request its guidance on how best to move this litigation forward” after the SEC announcement of McMahon’s settlement of charges made by the organization by paying a $400,000 fine and reimbursing $1.3 million to WWE. McMahon’s attorney then announced that day that they had filed a request opposing the request, with a statement sent to 411 and other outlets that read:
“The recent federal investigation resulted in no criminal indictments from the SDNY, while the SEC settlement relates to minor accounting issues at WWE that have nothing to do with this case. Any claims to the contrary made by Janel Grant’s team are just another desperate PR stunt.”
PWInsider reports that WWE also filed a motion on January 14th opposing Grant’s request, arguing that “Although Grant’s motion is styled as a request for a status conference, it effectively is an improper and belated request” to extend the deadline for their battle over whether the case should be moved to arbitration. WWE argued that Grant’s Grant’s request for an extension in order to respond due to the announcement of the SEC charges is “untimely” and that Grant’s team has “not shown good cause” for an extension.
The filing also noted:
“…the recently announced SEC settlement with McMahon has no bearing whatsoever on Defendants’ motions to compel and does not warrant an extension of Grant’s time to oppose the motions. Grant makes the conclusory assertion that the consent order “necessitate
Last edited:
Ad
Ad
Upcoming events
-
Australian Open - Women Renata Zarazua vs Jasmine PaoliniWagers: 3Staked: $1,025.00Event closes- Updated:
-
-
-
-