Ok, whatever you want to tell yourself. Apparently once I've argued with someone I'm never allowed to disagree with them again. Your comment about Brock is stupid considering you don't know him at all.I actually didn't bash Tony, I said he probably keeps his mouth shut now that his own skeletons are out there.
But keep going on how I'm defending the WWE because I said the Brock part sounds off, while saying I completely believe the feces story about the guy who owned WWE for 40 years.
But I'm sure you're not taking issue with me specifically because of previous discussions we've had.
Yeah, pretty sure he was being tongue in cheek there and I never said blindly defending WWE. I made the WWE fan comment because you unnecessarily brought up Tony. This really isn't a WWE thing anyhow, Vince has nothing to do with the company now. I'm also pretty sure two other posts made before mine took issue with your post without quoting you.I dunno bud, you singled out my post suggesting that it "Didn't seem like Brock" while completely bypassing this one that was literally two posts above it with the same skepticism:
And then claimed I was blindly defending WWE even though I quite clearly said the Vince stuff was 100% believable in the same post you quoted.
But yes... You absolutely aren't singling me out because you have a personal issue and an ax to grind.
Wasn't that more a matter of Vince bringing himself back because he had that power due to stock he owned?So I haven’t read much on the response to this but I’m just assuming WWE is assuming no responsibility over this like they didn’t bring the guy back like a year ago after he was already booted for sexual assault allegations lmao f*** Vince but f*** everyone running WWE currently as well.
Yeah, pretty sure he was being tongue in cheek there and I never said blindly defending WWE. I made the WWE fan comment because you unnecessarily brought up Tony. This really isn't a WWE thing anyhow, Vince has nothing to do with the company now. I'm also pretty sure two other posts made before mine took issue with your post without quoting you.
kinda hard to move into a place someone has owned for 40+ years and think those bathroom stains are just gonna go awaySo I haven’t read much on the response to this but I’m just assuming WWE is assuming no responsibility over this like they didn’t bring the guy back like a year ago after he was already booted for sexual assault allegations lmao f*** Vince but f*** everyone running WWE currently as well.
I’m pretty disappointed in Brock, honestly. Guy is legit one of my favourites ever.
Ok gotcha, I thought you were making fun of Riddle for being a creep. I suppose I should've known you weren't making a joke about such a serious issue.No I wasn't being tongue in cheek there, at that point the article I had read only said it was a WWE/UFC guy and had not specifically mentioned Brock, which I saw in a later article that Brock was actually named as the person in question
I would have to think that we have seen the last of both Brock and Vince in WWE, probably until one of them dies
I'll show myself outHockey fans: How much more can the sport be depraved?
VKM: Hold mydildoRocky Maivia
Vince's name and legacy are done. Finished. His name is going to be toxic like Weinstein or Epstein.
this goes much further than hardcore fans, people will and do absolutely care about sex trafficking in today’s environment (and thankfully so)This is certainly true for hardcore fans aka smart marks.
However, the following is also true. The others do not care about this. At all.
May not be what some of you want to hear...but it is what it is
this goes much further than hardcore fans, people will and do absolutely care about sex trafficking in today’s environment (and thankfully so)