If his name was Viktor Stalov and he was from Moscow 20 bucks says you'd have a much different opinion of him.
What's
is that that guy has played pretty well defensively and contributed on offense yet you continue to insist on sticking with your hilariously off-base analysis of what he brings to the table.
Stalberg has been a decent middle-six player at times in his career and seems to fit well with what we're doing here. Thus far he has proven worthy of a roster spot (another
to those that suggested he should be a healthy scratch or waived outright) and has been a positive contributor.
You literally just said he's been awful. You
just said he's a really bad hockey player. You're full of it.