OT: Video Games VI
- Thread starter Calicaps
- Start date
Curious to hear everyone's preferences or current setup configurations as far as monitors go. Since this is Cyber Monday, it seems the ideal time. Lots of people are shopping this week/weekend for an upgrade.
I have two PCs at my main desk, including a gaming rig with a Ryzen 9 7950X3D / RTX 4090. My secondary PC is a Ryzen 8 5800X / RTX 3080 Ti machine. Each PC is hooked up to a single panel. My main PC is dedicated to gaming, browsing, photo and video editing, and productivity whenever I work from home (which is rare). My secondary PC is now for secondary batch imagery/video processing, SSD/HDD storage, backup in case anything is wonky with my main gaming rig. But usually, it's playing YouTube videos or media files while I'm gaming (e.g. a MMO) or working on my main PC.
To my main gaming rig, I have the excellent Alienware 34" AW3423DW Ultrawide 1440p OLED panel hooked up, which I picked up in 2022, not too long after its release. Fantastic at the time, lots of other very good OELD panels have emerged since then. My secondary rig is using an excellent 27" ASUS ROG PG279Q IPS monitor. I have two of those, but they are 10 years old now. (My main PC is also connected to this panel via the HDMI connection to use as a second monitor for productivity.)
I have found myself increasingly torn in the ways that a lot of people are torn these days. OLED panels produce fantastic blacks, but burn-in is a real issue to watch for, and that makes them incredible for pigeonholed media playback and gaming applications, but not for regular desktop use. IPS are fantastic for desktop applications, photo editing as far as color accuracy, and TN have excellent response times for pro graming, but reproduction of blacks and HDR performance can be wanting there. VA are very good for all around performance, yet motion blur can be something to watch out for there from some brands. It's not really a field where there's a perfect panel for every application scenario and no perfect technology for an all-arounder needs case.
I decided to pick up a 32" Samsung Neo G8 at half price this weekend. It uses Mini LEDs, is full 4K, has good ratings for color accuracy, very good brightness levels, and very good blacks for a non-OLED panel. Won't have any burn-in issues. It's supposed to be an excellent all-arounder with strong gaming scores, and that's what I need for my gaming rig.
I'm going to use my Alienware on the secondary PC. It has suffered from mild burn-in issues and it's not really bright enough for desktop applications. That PC is almost always playing back media these days, though, so it is well suited for that use case.
I have two PCs at my main desk, including a gaming rig with a Ryzen 9 7950X3D / RTX 4090. My secondary PC is a Ryzen 8 5800X / RTX 3080 Ti machine. Each PC is hooked up to a single panel. My main PC is dedicated to gaming, browsing, photo and video editing, and productivity whenever I work from home (which is rare). My secondary PC is now for secondary batch imagery/video processing, SSD/HDD storage, backup in case anything is wonky with my main gaming rig. But usually, it's playing YouTube videos or media files while I'm gaming (e.g. a MMO) or working on my main PC.
To my main gaming rig, I have the excellent Alienware 34" AW3423DW Ultrawide 1440p OLED panel hooked up, which I picked up in 2022, not too long after its release. Fantastic at the time, lots of other very good OELD panels have emerged since then. My secondary rig is using an excellent 27" ASUS ROG PG279Q IPS monitor. I have two of those, but they are 10 years old now. (My main PC is also connected to this panel via the HDMI connection to use as a second monitor for productivity.)
I have found myself increasingly torn in the ways that a lot of people are torn these days. OLED panels produce fantastic blacks, but burn-in is a real issue to watch for, and that makes them incredible for pigeonholed media playback and gaming applications, but not for regular desktop use. IPS are fantastic for desktop applications, photo editing as far as color accuracy, and TN have excellent response times for pro graming, but reproduction of blacks and HDR performance can be wanting there. VA are very good for all around performance, yet motion blur can be something to watch out for there from some brands. It's not really a field where there's a perfect panel for every application scenario and no perfect technology for an all-arounder needs case.
I decided to pick up a 32" Samsung Neo G8 at half price this weekend. It uses Mini LEDs, is full 4K, has good ratings for color accuracy, very good brightness levels, and very good blacks for a non-OLED panel. Won't have any burn-in issues. It's supposed to be an excellent all-arounder with strong gaming scores, and that's what I need for my gaming rig.
I'm going to use my Alienware on the secondary PC. It has suffered from mild burn-in issues and it's not really bright enough for desktop applications. That PC is almost always playing back media these days, though, so it is well suited for that use case.
Last edited:
Devil Dancer
Registered User
- Jan 21, 2006
- 18,646
- 5,923
Tried Elden Ring again and man it just sucks. The world is boring, the combat is awkward, bosses are damage sponges that take forever, there’s nothing engaging about the story, and the hours and hours spent grinding are tedious and in no way rewarding or engaging. People can’t actually think this is one of the best games of all time, what a waste of time and money.
Jags
Mildly Disturbed
Sounds like what you've got there is an embarrassment of riches. 
When it comes to PCs, monitors are really the only thing in a setup that defies recommendation because the choice is 100% personal. Everyone's needs are different, some folks are videophiles that see every rendered flaw, and some aren't. And of course the biggest issue is price. You can easily spend anywhere from $100 to well over a grand and be perfectly happy based on your preferences.
For a setup like yours, the only real concern for most people is gaming in 4K, but you've got that covered. Both rigs are capable of it and then some. The 3080ti will have to work harder, but is more than up to the task.
The only thing I can think of that'd be even a remote concern is the size of the room these rigs reside in. If you're batch-encoding video on one machine and gaming on another (or similar workloads), the heat output of well-cooled machines is definitely going to raise the temperature of smaller rooms. So if you're operating in a den or bedroom-turned-office type situation, that could be something to think about. But it's also something you've already been dealing with, so it's likely a crossed bridge.
You did mention batch video processing on the 5800. Not sure I'd do that with the 7950 sitting right there unless I really had to. The 7950 will be up to 50% faster, which adds up crazy fast on lengthy batches. And if file size isn't a concern and you're using your video cards to encode, there's still a similar disparity. Depends on your use case though, and/or whether any of that matters to you to begin with.
Congrats on the new addition!
When it comes to PCs, monitors are really the only thing in a setup that defies recommendation because the choice is 100% personal. Everyone's needs are different, some folks are videophiles that see every rendered flaw, and some aren't. And of course the biggest issue is price. You can easily spend anywhere from $100 to well over a grand and be perfectly happy based on your preferences.
For a setup like yours, the only real concern for most people is gaming in 4K, but you've got that covered. Both rigs are capable of it and then some. The 3080ti will have to work harder, but is more than up to the task.
The only thing I can think of that'd be even a remote concern is the size of the room these rigs reside in. If you're batch-encoding video on one machine and gaming on another (or similar workloads), the heat output of well-cooled machines is definitely going to raise the temperature of smaller rooms. So if you're operating in a den or bedroom-turned-office type situation, that could be something to think about. But it's also something you've already been dealing with, so it's likely a crossed bridge.
You did mention batch video processing on the 5800. Not sure I'd do that with the 7950 sitting right there unless I really had to. The 7950 will be up to 50% faster, which adds up crazy fast on lengthy batches. And if file size isn't a concern and you're using your video cards to encode, there's still a similar disparity. Depends on your use case though, and/or whether any of that matters to you to begin with.
Congrats on the new addition!
That 5800X rig is now for secondary batch processing. I'll run Topaz Video AI, DxO PureRaw 4, and Photoshop/Lightroom on my main rig primarily. If I'm working on a bunch of batch tasks, though, I may have both rigs churn on content. Like AI upscaling an old TV show from 480p or 720p up to 1080p or 4K. I'll queue up multiple episodes on both rigs and let them work on that for a few hours.
The 7950X3D does require some manual core parking between productivity and gaming, but it flies. Definitely my primary rig for those tasks. The problem is, it's the primary rig for all tasks.
Separately, I rebuilt my HTPC with a 7900X and AM5 platform and placed it in the living room. In time, I may make that a dedicated video/photo processing rig. Just haven't got around to it. I'd put the 3080Ti in there, if so. I have a RTX 2080S and 2008Ti that can go in the 5800X if it's not going to be primarily doing AI workloads.
(I salvaged two 2080Tis and a SLI bridge from a VR workstation at work, but gave one to a coworker for his kids' gaming needs. Have still never played around with SLI at any level, and now SLI is gone. Maybe with retro Voodoo cards someday.)
Last edited:
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
who is your teams worst goalie in the last decades- Latest: TheDawnOfANewTage
